By Neenah Payne

The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic held “A Hearing with Dr. Anthony Fauci” on June 3. Congress might have asked better questions if it had known that the COVID policies were not designed to protect public health – but to protect Dr. Fauci from criticism and prosecution.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya shows in the video further below that to save himself, Dr. Fauci endorsed an unprecedented lockdown and the violations of our God-given rights of Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly, and Freedom of Religion protected by the First Amendment. Dr. Fauci endorsed the devastating mandates for the COVID shots. He enforced mask wearing which he now admits had no scientific basis. House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Hearing Reveals Dr. Fauci Made Mitigation Decisions Without Factual Evidence

Dr. Fauci  apparently perjured himself when he testified before Sen. Rand Paul about NIAID funding of gain of function research in the Wuhan lab. Perjury is punishable in prison for up to five years. Sen. Paul referred the case to the Department of Justice for prosecution.

The Legal Case Against Anthony Fauci explains that The Great Barrington Declaration was released to the public on 10/4/20. It argued for ending the lockdown. It was signed by many doctors and scientists and now has 939,000 signatures. Dr. Bhattacharya was one of the three drafters of the declaration. He is a professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.

Dr. Francis Collins was the Director of National Institutes of Health (NIH) .  Dr. Collins didn’t invite these esteemed scientists to discuss their Declaration which was gaining global support. Dr. Collins saw these doctors as “fringe” although they are professors at Harvard, Oxford, and Standford.  So, Dr. Collins emailed Dr. Fauci on 10/8/20 to say: ‘There needs to be a quick and devastating take down’.

Dr. Collins recently admitted that there was no scientific basis for the COVID policies.

Dr. Fauci: Historic Hero or Epic Villain?

Dr. Bhattacharya warns,

This catastrophic response that we faced during this pandemic will happen again in our lifetimes. The new normal is “lockdown until vaccine”. That is how we’re going to manage pandemics until there’s an explicit repudiation of the doctrine by public health. The International Health Regulations and the WHO Treaty are a way to essentially institutionalize this paradigm of how to manage pandemics going forward. You can’t have a Sweden next time that bucks the agenda.

Scientists Opened Pandora’s Box, What Now? American Thought Leader With Dr. Jay Bhattacharya (video)

Dr. Bhattacharya discusses the dilemma Dr. Fauci faced in 2020 when it was revealed that there was a COVID virus outbreak in Wuhan, China – the site of the lab his NIAID had funded to do research on the coronavirus in violation of US law. Dr. Bhattacharya says he has a “Grand Unifying Theory” of what happened during the COVID era.

He points out:

The central theme is that a relatively small number of very powerful scientific groups and bureaucrats decided that they had a formula for eradicating disease from the planet and removing the possibility of any new disease ever engulfing the globe again …The thought enters the mind of a few virologists and very powerful scientific bureaucrats that they can put a research agenda together to identify every single pathogen on the planet… and identify countermeasures and vaccines, so that they have them on stock just in case one of them makes the leap into the population….

Tony Fauci worked very hard to reverse the gain-of-function pause that was put in place in 2014 at the behest of the scientific community, which had said this work was so dangerous.….Then in 2019, there were reports from Wuhan, China, right in the city where the NIH is supporting a lab that does work on bat coronaviruses, that implicitly there’s a leak ….There’s an outbreak in the city where he supports a lab that does this gain-of-function research….

You have opened Pandora’s box. The virus is out in the world and you’re going to get blamed for it. You’re going to be remembered as the scientist that supported the agenda that led to this great pandemic….

Now, remember the promise of this utopian agenda is to have available countermeasures should any natural pathogen make its way into the human population.….Normally it would take a decade to develop a vaccine candidate and test it before it’s allowed to be used at scale in human populations….. Only within a week or so after the virus sequence is first officially released, we have a vaccine candidate. It’s roughly the same candidate that ends up being injected into billions of people just a few months later….It looks like they must have been doing research on it or else how did they come up with the target?…..

At the same time Pandora’s box is opened, we also have news of a countermeasure. It’s a success and a failure of that research program arriving at the same time. The news of the potential lab leak and outbreak and the news that there is a vaccine target arrive almost on top of each other December 2019 and January 2020. Again, put yourself in Fauci’s shoes. If it’s seen as a lab leak, it’s an enormous failure of his agenda. If it’s seen as natural origin and you have a vaccine target for something that you’ve studied, it’s an enormous success. The stakes could not be higher. Even if it’s seen as a lab leak, you still have the vaccine target early….

It’s almost like you need Shakespeare to write this up….You’re going to be remembered as one of history’s greatest scientific failures, maybe even like the creator of the Frankenstein monster, or you’re going to be remembered like Jonas Salk who developed a vaccine that solved a pandemic. It’s one or the other….

The problem is that this….virus is everywhere. If people get the virus and recover from it, you’re not going to need the vaccine. What’s the purpose of a vaccine if most people already have immunity to this virus? ….You recommend a whole suite of society-destroying policies like lockdowns, school closures, business closures, and church, mosque, and synagogue closures. …This “lockdown to a vaccine” ideology was a way to make sure people aren’t going to remember just Pandora’s box being opened, but that there was a success that came out of this utopian program….

They created this enormous experiment done on the lives of literally 8 billion people—and it largely fails….

In order to get that policy in place, you have …to make an illusion that what you believe to be the right policy is the current scientific consensus. Because the policy itself is so extraordinary that no one would do it unless every scientist agreed.  The last thing you can afford is to have an opposition that is credentialed, that has reasoned arguments, and really deserves a debate. You cannot have that debate.

Therefore, you get the devastating takedown of The Great Barrington Declaration. You also get an ideology where almost every natural process that you would normally use would be trivial within science.…The idea that you get immunity after you recover from Covid is a threat to your whole agenda….. You make it misinformation to say there’s such a thing as recovered immunity. You also create a sense … that if you think that there was a lab leak, you’re a conspiracy theorist. It is an absolutely vital part of the agenda, because….you can’t have people thinking you opened Pandora’s box….

The vaccine arrives and the data from the vaccine is equivocal.…. But you need the vaccine …. in order for you to be seen as a savior, and for the utopian agenda that you put forward to have actually worked. You have to convince the population that the vaccine will essentially sterilize the virus…. Because then you can get everybody to take it and you will be remembered as Jonas Salk….

This explains all kinds of craziness that happened during the pandemic. Why did dissident scientists have their careers destroyed? Because if you don’t have the illusion of consensus, you can’t get away with this extraordinary agenda.….You cannot have drugs that will work because that means the demand for the vaccine will be undercut….

The whole agenda is to close Pandora’s box, and to justify this decades-long utopian research project that Tony Fauci, Francis Collins, and a few other very, very powerful scientific bureaucrats had signed onto….

The great political success of the people that pushed this to convince governments around the world that this was the right thing to do has created a constituency class of very powerful people; politicians, pharmaceutical company folks, public health officials, people who run schools, and people who run hospitals.  The entire healthcare system signed onto this agenda. Many scientists signed onto this agenda. Universities signed onto this agenda….which was a tremendous mistake.

It’s very difficult for this confluence of power to back down from this enormous error that caused so much catastrophic harm….The international health regulations and the WHO Treaty are a way to….institutionalize this paradigm of how to manage pandemics…. The premise.…is that there was too much national sovereignty. You can’t have a Sweden next time….

If you’re going to “lockdown until the vaccine”, you better scare the living daylights out of the population.…. to gain compliance….It’s one thing for China to lock down, but it’s very different for a Western country that has civil rights protections and that has deep traditions and experience of managing pandemics in a much more rational way where you protect the vulnerable and you don’t disrupt society.

The panic in Wuhan was important, but once the panic spread to Bergamo and once it spread to New York, our fate was sealed. We were going to lockdown. There was going to be an attempt to close Pandora’s box no matter what, with the most draconian public health policy that has ever been implemented at scale in history…. It was the single biggest public health disaster in history and it was iatrogenic (caused by doctors)….

If you lose a war, the generals that lose a war are demoted…or new generals are put in place. Instead, what’s happened in public health is that the metaphorical generals who led the public health response are being promoted….Essentially, public health has decided they did a good job during the pandemic….That means this catastrophic response that we faced during this pandemic will happen again in our lifetimes. The new normal is “lockdown until vaccine”. That is how we are going to manage pandemics until there’s an explicit repudiation of the doctrine by public health….

You need a new generation of political leaders … But at the very least, we need structures that hold people responsible if they make catastrophic errors of this type, and then be able to replace them with different people.….A political leader that can use that experience to unify the people will find tremendous success….

It has been interesting to watch the opposition to the WHO Treaty and…. school closures. It brought together people who were on very different parts of the political spectrum. Left and Right…came together on these issues. A politician that can take these elements and weave them into a successful program will do great good for the world.

Supreme Court To Decide On Government Censorship shows that Dr. Bhattacharya is one of the plaintiffs  in Murthy v. Missouri, a landmark free speech case against the Biden administration.

Dr. Bhattacharya is the co-host of the Illusion of Consensus podcast.

Sen. Roger Marshall: US Must Stop Funding Dangerous Research with Communist China 6/6/24

In this episode, I sit down with Sen. Dr. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), an obstetrician and gynecologist, to get his take on gain of function research, the origins of the virus, and Dr. Anthony Fauci’s recent testimony before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.

Dr. Marshall shares what he believes are the “smoking guns” that link the origins of the coronavirus to a lab leak in Wuhan, China. “If we’re funding this type of research in a place like Wuhan, China, where we know that the CCP military is working hand in glove with all those scientists … this whole thing is a national security issue,” says Dr. Marshall. He argues all grants must be assessed for national security risks.

Neenah Payne writes for Activist Post

Top image credit: WFAA+

Become a Patron!
Or support us at SubscribeStar
Donate cryptocurrency HERE

Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Follow us on SoMee, Telegram, HIVE, Minds, MeWe, Twitter – X, Gab, and What Really Happened.

Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.