There was an interesting article by Michael Lind in Tablet:
The New National American Elite – America is now ruled by a single elite class rather than by local patrician smart sets competing with each other for money and power BY MICHAEL LIND – https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/new-national-american-elite

For all his insights, he might have put it more succinctly with “Jews control the gods”. But then, he wrote for Tablet, a Jewish journal that surely doesn’t tolerate ‘blasphemy’ against those very gods. After all, Jews are the god-makers in the West(and its satellites).

The perverse logic of ‘wokeness’ comes down to rigging the game to elevate Jewish prestige and power. Lind mentions Episcopalians and Hindus as among the richest groups in the US, but Jews are the richest, and it is they, NOT Episcopalians and Hindus, who control the gods. That makes all the difference. It means a Jewish pundit who makes $200,000 a year has more power than Jeff Bezos or Bill Gates with their many billions. As long as Jews control the gods, Jews lead, goyim follow. Twitter, whether under the management of Jack dorky Dorsey or Elon Muskrat, works under pressure from Zionist ADL and Jewish-heavy SPLC. Jewish commissars wield more power than goy C.E.O’s.

There’s been talk of China’s rise as the new strong horse in world affairs, but what is the difference between Jewish influence and Chinese influence in the West? Jews control the gods, Chinese don’t. Jews got both the strong horse and sacred cow, whereas Chinese only got the strong horse. Both groups spread the cash around, but whereas one can name the Chinaman as the briber and corrupter, no one better name the Jew.

And why did ‘gay rights’ turn into Gay Rites, a replacement for Christianity? It was a Jewish Plan. Consider the ascendence of the tranny. Now, did most women want this? Did they want to take a backseat to a bunch of freako men pretending to be ‘women’?
No. It was Jews who wanted it. The tranny agenda is to suppress any notion of majority leverage and pride(now a term virtually reserved for homo poo-riders and related sexual deviants). Among womenfolk, real women are more than 99% whereas tranny faux-women count for less than 1%. Yet, women now must make way for the trannies as champions of female sports and icons of female ’empowerment’, which is like Europeans celebrating the ‘New Europeans’ of blacks and browns as the best of the West.
Simply put, Jews regard tranny power/privilege as analogous to Jewish power/privilege. In both cases, it’s the minority-elite dictating and dominating over the vast majority. When the great majority of goyim let themselves fall under the Jewish spell, stuff like globo-homo and transmania were inevitable as furtherance of the Jewish Power Strategy. Jews see it as cultural rhyming: Jewish minority elite power rhymes with tranny minority elite power.

Furthermore, homos/trannies are especially useful to Jews because, while not every nation has Jews, every nation has its share of homos and trannies who may be alienated from their society and therefore willing to collaborate with Jewish Globalists who shower them with special favors and privileges.

What about this ‘equity’ crap? For all the rhetoric, has the New York Times hired a non-quisling Palestinian-American columnist to give his or her side of the story? No, NYT columnists heavily lean in favor of Jewish-Zionism that erased Palestine off the World Map via Nakba pogroms. Or, the columnists tend to be browbeaten goyim who dare not rock the boat and name the Jewish Power out of fear of being blacklisted as an ‘Anti-Semite’ and dropped from the roster.

Contra the spirit of ‘equity’, the cuck-goyim in the media, academia, and government dare not complain about TOO MANY JEWS or Jewish over-representation. No, the complaint is always about too many whites(and sometimes too many Asians, though generally lumped in with whites).
So, the issue of ‘equity’ is not about equity per se but about how certain FAVORED groups aren’t ‘properly’ represented in prestigious areas. As Jews are favored, it’s never a problem that they dominate media, Hollywood, state department, finance, and etc. Look at Biden’s government. It’s 66% Jews at the top, but no one complains. There can never be TOO MANY JEWS.

Indeed, when Rick Sanchez said Jews control CNN, he got fired for speaking the plainest truth. Likewise, it’s never a problem when blacks are over-represented. Who complains that the NBA and NFL aren’t diverse enough? Most basketball stars are black. The great majority of footballers are black. Many pop singers are black. But no one complains. If anything, black success or prominence is always a cause for celebration.
Most likely, if blacks were over-represented in Silicon Valley or elite NY high schools by a sizable margin, would anyone complain? No, it would be cause for joy. Blacks, like Jews, are deemed sacred, for whom there can never be too many blessings. So, the notion of ‘too many blacks’ is never an issue, even when too many blacks rob, rape, assault, and murder people. And ‘too many Jews’ can never be a problem. There’s been endless griping about Not Enough Black Quarterbacks, but where are the complaints about NO white, yellow, or brown running backs in the NFL? It’s perfectly fine for blacks to hog entire positions in sports.

The problem is only ‘too many whites’ and ‘too many Asians'(though this is usually chocked up as ‘too many whites’, i.e. Asians count as ‘honorary whites’ in the Jewish-run order). Homos are also favored. Homos dominate fashion at the expense of women. Partly, it’s due to talent and fancy, but it also owes to homos acting as an insular mafia.
Homos are also vastly over-represented in key fields, even in the bastions of power. Washington D.C. is 10% homo, and homos are found at all levels of the Deep State and work as agents of US Imperialism and Jewish Supremacism. But, no one harps about ‘too many homos’ because homos are favored. Jews control the gods, and it’s always a well-deserved blessing for Jews, blacks, and homos to be showered with power, money, and prestige.

If ‘social justice’ is about redressing historical wrongs and highlighting the most under-served groups, why do Jews, blacks, and homos hog most of the official sympathy? The greatest tragedy or ‘crime’ of American History was ‘genocide’ of the Indians. The Jewish Holocaust didn’t happen in the US. It happened in Europe(largely because Jewish abuses drove Europeans crazy), yet there is a Holocaust Museum in DC but no Indian Demise museum. Blacks experienced slavery, but surely genocide is far worse than slavery. Besides, blacks still own their ancestral lands in Africa. Africa is black. In contrast, the American Indians not only suffered ‘genocide’ but lost their ancestral lands forever to invasive masses from the Old World. Mass Immigration wiped out the American Indians, just like Mass Immigration of Jews wiped out Palestine.

Let’s face it. Mass Immigration = Genocide. It is bad enough that American Indians lost their sacred lands to whites, but now they must lose it to the entire world in the name of Open Borders. ‘Inclusion’ means acceptance of invasion. Palestine allowed ‘inclusion’ of some Jews in the 19th century, but how did that turn out? More and more Jews arrived until they replaced the Palestinians who now live under apartheid.

Jews claim to be ‘liberal’, but how come both Democratic Jews and Republican Jews support the anti-Constitutional suppression of BDS, a movement calling for equal justice for Palestinians? For sure, Michael Lind won’t be writing about this blatant hypocrisy in Tablet or any other journal because his media presence depends on sucking up to Jews.

As for Diversity as a panacea for all problems, why doesn’t Israel adopt an Open Borders policy and take in tons of Chinese, Hindus, and Africans? All the sunny talk of Diversity overlooks its roots in imperialism? What is now called ‘Latin America’ used to be homogeneously brown. Diversity was forced on it by the white Spanish and Portuguese invasions. Then, it was made further diverse by the slave trade that brought over millions of blacks(without the approval of the brown natives). Is that something to celebrate? Mass invasions, mass genocide, mass rape, and mass slavery? The brown natives of South America didn’t ask to be invaded. They didn’t ask that their lands be made diverse via imperialism and the slave trade. So, what is the result of this diversity? White Hispanics and Jews sit atop the totem pole in so-called Latin America. You got mixed-raced mestizos in the middle , and you got brown natives and blacks on the bottom.
Or, look at Hawaii. It was once entirely Hawaiian, but diversity was forced upon it by white invasion. And then, white invaders allowed massive Asian immigration. As a result, the native Hawaiians are now only 12% of the population in their ancestral homelands. Sounds to me like cultural genocide, but we are told it’s something to celebrate. “Hey, you native Hawaiian, why don’t you celebrate the demise of your people and culture in favor of white invaders and Asian collaborationist immigrants?” Sounds cruel if you ask me.

By the way, why is it even called ‘Latin America’? The indigenous folks have been living in the southern continent for over 20,000 yrs, whereas the white Latino invaders have been there for only 500 yrs. And yet, it’s called Latin America. Why must indigenous identities and cultures take a backseat to the identity of Latin European invaders? The ‘woke’, in referring to browns as ‘Hispanics’ and ‘Latinos’, apparently have no problem with the wholesale erasure of indigenous history and culture. For all their bitching about Columbus, the ‘woke’ lump the masses of browns with the white Conquistadors who, over the centuries, imposed their identity on the natives.

The notion of ‘inclusion’ is most perplexing. What does it mean? Does it mean every nation should adopt Open Borders and welcome endless hordes of outsiders? But look at the fate of Tibet. It is forced to include the influx of Han Chinese. There are 1.5 million Tibetans and 1.2 billion Han Chinese. The policy of ‘inclusion’ is leading to the erasure of Tibet as a distinct people and culture.
People denounce nativism, but invasivism seem infinitely worse? Indeed, the story of organisms has been one of nativism vs invasivism. Americans, of all people, should know this. American Indians were nativists who fought to protect their lands from invasivist European settlers. Nativism lost to Invasivism. Over time, the white settlers became the new nativists who put down roots in American soil. But with open borders, they will be replaced like the Indians. Look at California that, in a few decades, went from a solid white majority state to a white minority state.

Jews understand this. This is why they are totally nativist in Israel while pushing invasivism on goy nations. Jews want goy nations to be filled up with diversity so that Jews can play divide-and-rule among the divided populations. Jews do this in the US. Jews make anti-Muslim movies and show them to white Christians and tell them, “Join the military, go to the Middle East, and blow away those raghead muzzies”, and then Jews bring Muslims here and whisper in their ears, “We Jews and you Muslims are allies against those eeevil white supremacists.” What a dirty game these Zionists play.

Also, inclusion invariably leads to exclusion. Why? Because various groups have different talents. Allowing blacks into sports has led to a de facto exclusion of non-blacks. Because blacks are better natural athletes, allowing them into the game means others don’t get to play. All running backs are black. All 100 m sprint finalists are black. The French soccer team is largely black. Many sports teams might as well put up a sign: “Non-Blacks Need Not Apply”. Los Angele is very diverse with lots of browns and yellows, but the sports teams are almost all black.

And letting trannies into women’s sports means that women will be excluded from taking the trophies because men-pretending-to-be-women are bigger and stronger. And allowing smarter Jews into America has led to the Jewish takeover and domination of elite institutions. And with their power, Jews exclude those posing a potential challenge to their supremacist interest. If you support BDS, forget about it. You won’t work for Wall Street, State Department, NYT, or Hollywood. If a film director shows interest in making a movie about Nakba, he will be blacklisted 100x worse than Dalton Trumbo and other communists in the 1950s.

And notice how Jews use Globo-Homo to justify Zionist supremacism, at least in the eyes of shallow deracinated whites of the West. Jews made globo-homo holy in Western hearts and minds. Jews tell the West, “Look, Israel has big homo parades whereas Muslims are hostile to homos.” As Western folks are now totally besotted with globo-homo, they support Zionist oppression of Palestinians on grounds of “is it good for gay?”

In the past, Western Imperialism sugar-coated its wars and invasions with missionary tales of spreading Christianity. So, the invasions and exploitations were morally justified under the cover of Christian sanctimony. Today, the decadent West that is brainwashed by Jewish control of media/academia is into worship of ‘rainbow’ sodomy as the highest value. So, the Deep State paints the Bomb ‘gay’ to win the support of the so-called ‘progressives’ and the cuckservatives. Instead of ‘onward Christian soldiers’, it’s ‘inward homo troopers’.

Indeed, what is the new cold war with Russia about? Russia said NO to massive homo parades in the Red Square. Russians consider the ground sacred. Annually, they remember the sacrifice of 25 million who died in defense of the Motherland against the German Wehrmacht. But Jews seek to desecrate the holy ground with parades where vain homos and trannies strut around with dildos. Yet, American ‘progressives’ are now so into globo-homo idolatry that they see Russia as the evil nation and support the new cold war. What a stupid world.