
A clear demonstration of the Power of the Word is ‘appeasement’. When is it and when is it not appeasement? It’s like the politicization of the term ‘hate’. When Jews hate you, it’s not hate. But be mildly critical of Jews, and you’re a ‘hater’. And what is meant by ‘extreme’? These days, a man with a chunky pair of balls who claims to be a woman is a ‘woman’. That is the New Normal. But a conservative(or even a lesbian/feminist of the TERF variety) who disagrees could be branded as ‘extreme’.
Once, you had to be Nazi-like to be ‘extreme’ or ‘far-right’ on the ideological spectrum. But now, the mere desire of Hungarians to preserve their ethnic and cultural integrity is condemned as such. But then, when Jews zealously guard their own identity, heritage, and territory in Israel, it’s something all of us must honor, support, and celebrate. If you criticize Zionist excesses or defend justice for Palestinians, you’re smeared like Jeremy Corbyn or Roger Waters, recently dumped by a former bandmate. You are either guilty of antisemitism or harboring it in your camp.
Back to ‘appeasement’. It’s become a famous, indeed infamous, term in association with the supposed weaklings who caved to Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich at Munich. Say the word ‘appeasement’, and Neville Chamberlain comes to mind. A poison term, it’s often used to smear those seeking constructive dialogue with Iran — apparently, whatever Jews hate is the ‘new hitler’. Neocon Jews and their cuck-puppets never tire of denouncing their critics and opponents as the ideological heirs of those naive fools or craven cowards who negotiated with Hitler. So, the mere acknowledgement of Iran’s legitimate interests is tantamount to repeating the mistakes of 1939 and paving the way for World War III and maybe another Holocaust, despite the irony that Jewish Supremacism is currently the biggest warmonger, as well as the biggest mass-murderer, in the world. Just ask the peoples of Palestine, Syria, Iraq, and the Donbass.

‘Appeasement’, like ‘phobia’, is not a neutral or objective term. It is judgmental and denunciatory. It implies the person calling for dialogue and compromise is either a sucker, traitor, or wimp. Someone labeled as ‘phobic’ is either accused to be or ‘diagnosed’ as irrational and pathological in his fears or dislikes. So, if someone is opposed to non-stop immigration(like White Nakba for example) that could forever transform the demographic and cultural character of his homeland, he isn’t a patriot with healthy anxieties but a bigot with sickness in his head(and soul): Yes, a ‘xenophobe’.
Likewise, ‘appeasement’ isn’t merely a call for negotiation but selling out to the devil. Of course, appeasement is relative depending on the perspective. German critics could have felt that Hitler appeased the British and the French by promising not to press further for German territories lost after World War I in exchange for Chamberlain’s acceptance of fait accompli in the Czech Territory.
Because the term ‘appeasement’ is judgmental, historians need to tread carefully in its usage. It is more often a form of editorializing than understanding. The term is innately problematic as a moral definition. After all, if ‘to appease’ means, “To placate or attempt to placate (a threatening nation, for example) by granting concessions, often at the expense of principle”, then it is an all-too-common fact of life than something out of the blue. Power differentials are a reality everywhere. Some people are richer, more influential, or more powerful. So, it’s often the case that the weaker party makes concessions to the stronger party. However, most such interactions or transactions are not called ‘appeasement’. So, even appeasement isn’t ‘appeasement’ if normalized within the order.
What is the most powerful group in the US? It’s the Jews, and so much of US politics, economics, and social policy is about non-Jews sucking up to Jews. Politicians cater to the interests and whims of Wall Street and the Donor Class, both heavily Jewish. Anyone who wants to work in Hollywood has to suck up to Zionists. Mutter something about BDS or the dark side of Jewish Power, and out the door you go.
Notice how US politicians of European backgrounds never make pilgrimages to their own ancestral homelands. Rather, they go to Israel, don a yarmulke, face the Wailing Wall, and mutter something along the lines of “Oh Great Jew, let me kiss thy arse.” They all suck up to Jews by invoking the Shoah while ignoring the other horrors of the 20th century(or any century), that is unless the narrative coincides with Jewish interests, e.g. “Muh Kurds!” US politicians shill for Israel and spew hatred against Iran. They bow down to AIPAC as willing lackeys for More Wars for Israel.

All such behaviors certainly qualify as appeasement but are never called such. But then, the system is controlled by Jews. Apparently, appeasing Jews is not appeasement but the obvious good and sacred duty, like a Catholic kneeling before the Cross. In the current order, nothing is more ‘patriotic’ and ‘American as apple pie’ than appeasing Jews on the Ukraine project. If anything, those who oppose the war are accused of ‘appeasement’ even though they don’t receive a dime from Putin(while the cuck-maggots who lionize Zelensky are showered with favors and fortune).
Appeasing Jewish Power is so second-nature in US politics that hardly anyone even notices it for what it is. Successive generations of Americans have become accustomed to appeasement to Jews as just a way of doing business, something never to be questioned, even a matter of faith and sacrament.
After the 2020 election, one might think the bulk of American Conservatives would finally wake up and call foul on Jewish Power. Trump surely appeased Zion a thousand times over but got rammed in the arse just the same. In other words, it was a case of ‘with Jews, you lose’. But all we got from The Donald and his cuck-MAGA crew is more appeasement to Zionist saber-rattling at Iran and hysterics about ‘China, China, China’. Never mind China too has been in the business of appeasing the Jews as the go-to ruling elites of the US. (And even now, Russia refuses to name the Jewish Power behind the Ukraine fiasco and instead pontificates about ‘de-Nazification’, as if it’s World War II Redux than a possible road to World War III where Jews are the New-Nazis.)
Cuck Steve Bannon bitches about Iran’s threat to Israel when Israel supports terrorism against Syria and when Jewish Power engineered the political demise of Trump. This is what’s wrong with cuckservatism. Jews do most to undermine Americanism, but the message is always ‘muh israel’. Btw, Biden has ramped up hostility against China(more than Trump), and his administration is over 75% Jewish-Zionist.
‘Appeasement’, like ‘hate’, is always something done by the Other. For example, when Jews hate(Russia, White Christians, Syrians, Arabs, Palestinians, Hungarians, etc.), no matter how virulently, it ain’t hate. While it’s been repeated ad nauseam that Neville Chamberlain appeased Hitler, it’s hardly mentioned that Winston Churchill(and FDR) appeased Joseph Stalin by conceding all of Eastern Europe to the Soviets. Richard Nixon was much lauded for negotiating with Mao Zedong. It wasn’t called ‘appeasement’. But the merest hint of Trump wanting to discuss matters with Putin was condemned as ‘appeasement’ of ‘Putler’.
But then, GOP cucks shrieked about Obama’s deal with Iran as ‘appeasement’, once again invoking World War II, even though Obama did it at the behest of J-Street Jews seeking to ease Iran out of the Russia-China orbit. GOP cucks even misled the public by accusing Obama of funneling billions of US taxpayer dollars to Iran when, in fact, the money was part of Iran’s frozen assets in the US. What a clown-show. Obama appeases J-Street Jews by cutting a deal with Iran, and the GOP appeases AIPAC Jews by shrieking about Obama-the-appeaser.

In the West, there are two kinds of appeasement. There are those who appease Jews in the most pathetic manner. John McCain was champion, but plenty of GOP and Democratic politicians qualify as top contenders. (Lindsey Graham is probably the current cuck-champ.) They know all the dog-and-pony show tricks. Such a tact might be called ‘positive appeasement’, or positively shameless in cucking.
But, there’s another kind, what might be called ‘negative appeasement’. Take Rand Paul. While he often displeases the Zionists by refusing to back every War for Israel, he won’t call out on Jewish Power. He turns every policy issue into an abstract discussion of principles and the Constitution. But current events simply cannot be understood apart from the JQ, especially in relation to the tribal hypocrisy of preaching ‘equity’ and ‘social justice’, all the while pushing for policies that only increase the position of Jews and Israel.

In a fair world, either nothing or anything fitting the description should be called ‘appeasement’. So, if what Chamberlain did was appeasement, so was Churchill’s deal with Stalin. And all the weaker players in the US empire should be called appeasers to Uncle Sam(or Shem). What does Europe do but constantly appease the US that is controlled by Jews? Even after the Jewish-controlled US went full gangster-terrorist and blew up the Nord Stream pipelines, all we get from Germans(and others) is crickets. And these people have the gall to invoke the memory of Munich and Neville Chamberlain as moral lessons.
Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan are also appeasers to the US empire. Latin America is full of appeasers to the Yanquis, now the Yanqueers. And US politicians are mostly craven appeasers groveling before Jewish Master Racists. But, the term is used selectively to demean ONLY THOSE who concede in a manner disapproved of by Jewish-controlled US empire that shapes the narrative and discourse via its lock on academia and media and deep state.

Appeasing Jewish Power means one must also appease whatever is favored by Jews. So, if Jews hype BLM, one must appease black thuggery as the ‘new sainthood’. Even though blacks are the most violent criminal class in the US, one must pretend otherwise and sing hosannas to magic blackness.
And of course, there’s Globo-Homo. Jewish Power favors the holy homos, and so, we mustn’t upset the homos lest we displease Jews with the wherewithal to crush us. Jews are the ‘Made Men’ of US power, meaning the only truly functional ‘law’ of the land is ‘Whatever Jews Want, We Must Give’. Appease globo-homo. Cuck like Trump and Kari Lake at Mar-a-Lago to ‘gay marriage’. Sodomy is the new god, or godomy. Jews demand it, so obey, appease. If a tranny says he’s a woman, use ‘proper pronouns’ where he is a ‘she’ or even a ‘they’. Surely, powerful Jews are cracking up behind closed doors at the sheer stupidity and/or cowardice of goyim.
We now have an odd situation where one must appease the Jews in order not to be branded an ‘appeaser’. Likewise, one must hate whatever Jews hate in order not to be called a ‘hater’. And it’s not enough that most people bend over backwards to appease Jews. Even the slightest whimper suggesting that the US should strive for better terms with Russia or some other nation loathed by Jews is lambasted as ‘appeasement’. Jewish Power is like a jealous god that says “Our Way or the Highway”. It’s not enough to appease the Jews. One must appease ONLY the Jews.
There are no two sides, only the Jewish side. If you talk to the ‘wrong’ people abroad, you’re an ‘appeaser’, and if you talk to the ‘wrong’ people in the US, you’re a ‘hater’. You may only talk to Jews and those approved by Jews. Actually, don’t talk and just listen, as the ‘conversation’ means Jews, homos, and blacks talk and you listen(and agree).

Just like the US dollar is the world currency, Jewish Outrage of Tri-Supremacism(centered on Jews, Negroes, and Homos) circulates as the world moral currency. The only way to earn ‘woke’ currency is by appeasing the supremacism of Jews, megalomania of Negroes, and vanity of homos. Thus, every European nation has a Holocaust Museum, and homo prides are everywhere to proselytize that “Our people have accepted gayspel as the new gospel.” Or even nations without blacks or black problems make a fuss about BLM to show they are with the program. But, don’t call any of this ‘appeasement’.
Western elites are now worse than ever because the dynamics of elite selection favors the supremacists among the Jews but only saps and flunkies among whites. A Jew who is conscientious and critical of Jewish Power is also disqualified. Just ask Norman Finkelstein who couldn’t even secure a gig at second-tier college DePaul. A Jew HAS to be supremacist to make it to the top. As for whites, anyone exhibiting independence of thought or anything resembling courage/integrity is weeded out. His academic prospect could be over even before it begins if, for example, he posted something on Twitter or Facebook that could be displeasing to Jews, homos, and/or blacks.
The end-result is that white social elevation is restricted to saphead cucks who go along to get along. They may still be smart and capable, but they are born appeasers and toadies than people of integrity and independence. In other words, the likes of Mitt Romney, John McCain, Ben Sasse, Brian Kemp, Paul Ryan, and etc.

It’s like the Asian-ization of the West. In the East, exams are seen as an end than a means to an end. Exams aren’t so much a measure of future success as success itself. So, Asians eschew independence of thought and merely study whatever is approved to pass exams as validation of success.
In the quasi-Confucian Neo-West, whites must pass the PC exam of approved-thought than demonstrate aptitude for thought itself. Never mind the danger of harboring a ‘thought-crime’; thinking itself might as well be a crime, now extending even to the cucked A.I. that spews out whatever Jews program it to. Millennials were weaned on approval-of-thought than independence-of-thought. The result is a system with sniveling Jewish supremacist masters lording over groveling white goy cuck-maggots. But, we’re assured that white cuckery isn’t appeasement because nothing is more natural than worshiping, obeying, and flattering the neuroticism of Jewish Megalomania.

