By Bill Rice
Dr. Meryl Nass created a slide where she lists seven explanations for why the lab origin had to be covered up. This slide was included in a recent two-part article by A Midwestern Doctor, who is lending support to Dr. Nass’s heroic efforts to scuttle the nefarious “WHO treaty.”
The text of Dr. Nass’s slide reads:
Because of critical hidden agendas:
Elsewhere, Dr. Nass pointed out that a “lab leak” or “deliberate spread” are “both in play.”
At least to me, all of Dr. Nass’s explanations ring true. Opining for myself, I’d rank her third bullet point – “It was critical to support the biosecurity agenda” as No. 1 on my list.
Ever the contrarian, I’ve always suspected the question of where the virus originated might not have been as important to Pandemic Producers as concealing evidence of when this virus really began to spread throughout the world.
(Aside: If any serious Covid researcher reads only one story I’ve written, I hope it’s the article linked in the above paragraph.)
In the off-chance anyone might be interested, I created my own logic/history flow-chart, which summarizes key points of my personal hypothesis.
As Dr. Nass theorizes, one of the primary goals of the producers of our Faux Pandemic was to promote “biosecurity.” In a a more concrete sense, this meant promoting research into new mRNA vaccines, which would be marketed as providing said “security.”
Even before official Covid, participants in the Pandemic Planning Retreats stressed how important it would be to block contrarians (anti-vaxers and science deniers) from challenging their solutions. So they created the Censorship Industrial Complex (which, I guess, did create high-paying new jobs).
A few skeptics still think “following the money” is a worthwhile endeavor. As events unfolded and for what it’s worth…a pretty good amount of money was spread around to deliver this new “bio-security.”
The only “evidence” the world had that this virus was deadly in Wuhan was that famous video of the man on the street falling down dead from “Sudden Covid.”
What’s interesting about that footage is that in the four years since – and with all the billions of people who have smartphones with video or camera capability – we’ve never seen another Covid victim anywhere who just fell down dead in the street of “Sudden Covid.”
(Contrast this to the endless loops of contraband footage we’ve seen of vaccinated people falling out dead.)
The first step (solution) was to impose global lockdowns.
However, public health officials also mandated the wearing of face coverings and authorized well-connected entrepreneurs to create stickers that could be placed on the floor of, say, the grocery store dairy aisle. These stickers kept people at least six feet from their fellow shoppers. Absent these stickers, citizens probably would have been afraid to go to the grocery store and would have starved to death, which would not be good for “public health.”
Other entrepreneurs provided hand sanitizer by the tanker loads. Mask sales topped out at 40 or 50 billion units.
Alas, it’s very possible that nobody would want the mRNA vaccines if they knew they weren’t going to die from this virus…for example, if they knew this virus was no more deadly than the regular flu or any number of ILI bugs.
If people started investigating origin possibilities besides the outbreak at the live market, they might see/conclude that this virus had been infecting people for many months. This could/would lead to the conclusion that…this was not a deadly virus – and no rushed and mandated mRNA vaccines were even necessary. This revelation, in fact, might scuttle the whole planned pandemic.
Of course, you can’t have a deadly virus unless you have an eye-opening number of actual “virus deaths”…and the morgues-full of deaths finally arrived in northern Italy and later New York City as well as a few other key big cities.
Alas, according to the banned science deniers, the deaths almost certainly came not from the novel virus but from the iatrogenic protocols and the panic.
The government actually created the (non-deadly) virus…and then the test to confirm the presence of the virus (and thus the massive spike in “Covid deaths”)…and then the circumstances that actually caused the required number of deaths.
For some reason, almost everywhere in the world, the explosion of deaths all happened at almost the same time – and always after the lockdowns had been ordered and the new Covid protocols had been fully implemented. (Also, in the Spring – which is not the normal “respiratory virus season.”)
But I maintain none of the above would have been possible if some pesky virus sleuths – who didn’t take their orders from Dr. Fauci – proved that the virus has been circulating around the world for months – before that Wuhan live market.
Again, I think the great misdirection was not necessarily the project to make everyone think this virus originated from some animals at a Wuhan Live Market. The important ruse was making everyone think this virus didn’t begin to spread until mid or late December 2019.
The experts may (or may not) be right that “case zero” occurred in Wuhan, China. But they are definitely wrong about when that first case happened.
I leave it to readers to come up with their own answers as to why it might have been so important for our trusted public health officials to create a bogus timeline on the birth of virus spread.
Republished from the author’s Substack
Bill Rice, Jr. is a freelance journalist in Troy, Alabama.
Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
For reprints, please set the canonical link back to the original Brownstone Institute Article and Author.
Sourced from Brownstone Institute
Become a Patron!
Or support us at SubscribeStar
Donate cryptocurrency HERE
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Follow us on SoMee, Telegram, HIVE, Minds, MeWe, Twitter – X, Gab, and What Really Happened.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.