BLM(Black Lives Matter) and UVM(Ukrainian Victory Matters) have something in common. Both, like WMD about Iraq, were founded on lies and produced the very opposites of their stated objectives. BLM claimed that the relatively high rates of black male deaths owed to ‘racist’ and ‘white supremacist’ cops prowling black communities to carry out ‘genocide’ on saintly blacks such as Michael Brown and George ‘Fentanyl’ Floyd. In truth, most blacks are killed by other blacks, often involving criminals vs criminals or thugs vs thugs, and increased police presence considerably lowers the death rates among blacks.

But, the Big Lie was promoted by the PTB(powers-that-be) and unleashed BLM pogroms and Afro-Kristallnachts all across America(and even spread to parts of Europe). By pretending that urban/racial problems result from ‘racist’ police policies(and/or ‘systemic racism’ if one is pseudo-intellectually inclined) upon a helpless, saintly, and noble black community, there were calls to ‘defund the police’, actually implemented in many ‘blue’-dominated urban areas.

NICHOLAS J. FUENTES: LIBERAL JOURNALIST KILLED BY BLACK CRIMINALS

Video Link

Guess what the results were. Blacks committing more crimes, petty and violent, with impunity and more blacks killing blacks in the absence or the hesitance of the police. Based on a willful misdiagnosis of social and racial reality, the results were the very opposite of the stated objective of ‘black lives matter’. Of course, Black Pride got a lot of boost with institutions and industries caving to black demands and making blackness the new de facto face of America in commercials and propaganda, but when it came to actually saving black lives, BLM turned out to be a total disaster.

Likewise, Ukrainian Victory Matters or UVM was based on a lie. It wasn’t Russia that instigated a war in Ukraine but the West that knowingly taunted Russia with the possibility of Ukrainian NATO membership. The crisis point can be traced back to 2014 when the West plotted the Maidan coup against the government in Kiev, surely corrupt like its predecessors but democratically elected. Because the regime wanted to work with both the EU and Russia, it was targeted for removal Gaddafi style.

The coup divided the country, especially as Russo-Ukrainians and Russia-leaning Ukrainians no longer felt represented by the new regime that answered to the US and EU. All efforts by Russia to mediate and decrease tensions by working with the Kiev regime to accept and accommodate the heavily Russian character of eastern Ukraine were either ignored or violated(as with the Minsk Accords). Continued military attacks on eastern Ukraine finally forced Russia’s hand in carrying out the ‘special military operation’.

UVM was based on many lies. It ignored the historical connection between Russia and Ukraine. Lithuania, in contrast, is a Baltic nation with its own unique language. If Lithuanians wanted to expel Russians living there to bolster Lithuanianism in identity and unity, they’d have a strong national case as the two ethnicities, cultures, and languages are distinct. Such a case could never be made of Ukraine, especially eastern Ukraine where Russian-ness and Ukrainian-ness have often overlapped and evolved more or less as one. The idea of a unique Ukrainian identity and culture totally at odds with ‘alien’ Russia never made sense.
But, in the zeal to boost an ultra-nationalist mindset, even the so-called ‘Ukro-Nazis’ were granted special privileges and positions as they appeared to be most committed to terrorizing ethno-Russian civilians and fighting Russia(if it came to a war), not least owing to an ideology drawn from Ukraine’s collaboration with the Germans in World War II.

Whenever someone tries to gaslight you that Donbass was fine before 2022, minimize Kiev’s strikes, or blame Russia, show them this CNN report on the early stages of that conflict. pic.twitter.com/v7M4tQ6LKB

— Nina