Some geopolitical strategists fear that China’s rise in the 21st century will mirror the dramatic rises of Germany and Japan in the late 19th century that came to plague the first half of the 20th century, though for reasons not entirely their own. Perhaps, it’s a misplaced fear. Such assurance may seem counterintuitive because China is so much bigger and more populous than Germany or Japan. Paradoxically, however, China might be less dangerous than Japan and Germany precisely because it is the bigger nation. Being huge in landmass and population, China is more likely to be satisfied with what it has. China surely seeks to expand trade around the world but doesn’t need to conquer or control other nations to be a great power. It doesn’t need an empire because it is an empire-sized nation all on its own.

Same could be said for Russia. Its gigantic size and boundless resources ensure its place in the world as an important player. While Russians are underachievers, Russia doesn’t need more territory to be one of the great powers of the world.

In contrast, the reason why Japan and Germany became problematic was the discrepancy between their ambitions(in will and ability) and their limitations(in land and resources). If both had been content to be normal nations, they would have accepted their prescribed place in the world. But modern Germany looked to Great Britain and France as models, moderate-sized nations that became world powers by amassing empires. Unlike the US and Russia that could be great on their own due to abundant geography and sizable & growing demographics, France or Great Britain couldn’t be great on its own. It needed to control the seas and distant lands.

Germans perceived themselves to be a capable, even superior, people and felt deserving of greatness, and that called for an empire. As for Japan, its rapid rise filled them with confidence and then hubris. Especially with the great naval victory in the Russo-Japanese War, it entertained an expanding role in the Pacific. But like Germany, Japan had limited land mass and resources that could sustain only so much. On its own, it could be a regional power but not a great power. Especially after the miserable failures of the Chinese responses to the Western challenge, Japan saw itself as the rightful master-ruler of Asia, which was rife with schizophrenia as it took on the dual role of co-imperialist alongside the West and defender of the Asian brethren against the West.

If China had modernized concurrently with Japan in the 19th century, then Japan would have had no choice but to acknowledge China as the dominant power in Asia. It would have been less likely for Japan to develop an over-sized national ego from the perception of China as the Sick Man of Asia. In its encounter with the West, China was slow to modernize whereas Japan did so almost overnight. Flush with power and success, Japan was determined to remain ahead of China as the dominant force in Asia. Back then, Japan was much smaller than China but much stronger, or China was much bigger than Japan but much weaker.
This contradiction led to the great war between the two nations. It was like a fit and feisty small guy taking on a flabby and feeble big guy. Japan as the tough small guy was the better fighter but couldn’t deliver a KO blow to a guy who was too big despite the ill health. At any rate, because Japan could only be a great power by having an empire, it was desperate to gain more territory and clashed with other empires and was eventually crushed by the combined might of the Allies.

Well, that was then, this is now. China now has both the bigger economy and the bigger military than Japan. The bigger nation has the bigger power, and so, the geopolitical dynamic in Asia is more normal as it’s only natural that the bigger nation should be more powerful. Indeed, for most of Asian history, Japan had always acknowledged China as the main power in the region, and that recognition had been the basis of peace between them as well as with other Asian nations.

Now, will the newly risen China feel tempted to act like Japan in the first half of the 20th century? Flush with wealth and might, will it aggressively seek to gain hegemony over all of Asia and maybe the world? Will it be like Militarist Japan x 10?
It’s unlikely because China doesn’t need more land and more people to be a great power. China can be a great power within its own borders. Thus, its ambitions are limited to coastal areas. China has no territorial ambitions in other parts of the world. Also, it has enough problems within its own borders, especially with Tibetans and Uighurs. The last thing it needs is more ethnic conflicts.

So, which people will be the main menace to world peace and geopolitical stability?

The main problem lies with the Jews because their Contradiction of Power is the most radioactive by far. What is the essence of this contradiction? Jews are rich in money and influence but poor in numbers(demographics). The result is a Jewish neurosis composed of equal measures of megalomania and paranoia.
Just think. Jews are more powerful than the Chinese, Hindus, Russians, Anglos, Germans, Japanese, French, and Iranians, but there are far fewer Jews than the populations of major gentile nations. Japan has over 110 million, Germany has 80 million, Russia has 125 million, and etc.
In contrast, there are only 13 million Jews in the world. And their nation, Israel, is a tiny speck in the Middle East. Jewish super-power owes to Jews controlling the US(the most powerful nation on earth), the UK, Canada, and the EU, but their influence hangs in the balance of White Submissivism, i.e. unless white gentiles continue to remain servile and defer to Jews, Jewish Power can collapse overnight.

❤️‍