By Matthew Ehret

Just when you thought that every possible type of propaganda has already been unleashed onto the world, congressional hearings on aliens entered the scene in 2023.

Of course, the world has been awash in UFO-themed narratives within pop culture since the earliest days of the Cold War.

Even Laurence Rockefeller himself (4th grandson of John D. Rockefeller) got into the game in 1992 by creating the Disclosure Project and bankrolling a bodybuilding military physician named Stephen Greer while recruiting the Clintons and John Podesta into the cause of “UFO Truth”… but it is only in the past few years that official Congressional, Pentagon, and NASA investigations “into off world vehicles not made on this earth,” Area 51, Roswell crashes, and crop circles have become part of the official mainstream discourse of the nation.

The Pentagon — not known for any love of transparency (having failed literally six audits since 2001 and losing over $21 trillion according to some estimates) — has deemed it fitting to admit publicly that “off world vehicles not made on this earth” have been in the possession of government agencies for decades.

Former intelligence officials like David Grusch, and Cmdr. David Fravor have been hailed as courageous whistleblowers for admitting that the US military has been talking to aliens since an interstellar ship traveling faster than the speed of light crashed into a desert in Roswell in the 1947. According to Grusch and company, these alien beings are such bad pilots that numerous crashes have occurred over the past 70 years resulting in dozens of crashes and clashes with US fighter pilots.

When asked by Rep. Jared Moskowitz, D-Fla, how these secret government programs receive funding, Grusch stated that they are “above congressional oversight” and funded by “misappropriation of funds.” So not only do we now know the truth about aliens, but we finally know where the missing $20 trillion of Pentagon spending went… so we can stop thinking about that too.

One thing that Grusch and other “whistleblowers” feel confident in proclaiming: These alien beings are not necessarily friendly at all, and humanity should be scared.

As fellow whistleblower Cmdr. David Fravor stated during the hearings: “If you had one, you captured one, you reversed-engineered it and got it to work, you’re talking something that can go into space, go someplace, drop down in a matter of seconds, do whatever it wants and then leave and there’s nothing we can do about it. Nothing.”

Grusch went further in an interview with Sky News describing alien attacks resulting in the murder of human pilots:

Former NRO and NGA officer David Grusch has written a document that seemingly alludes to agreements between world governments and the non-human intelligence behind UFOs.#ufotwitter #uaptwitter pic.twitter.com/KSnBUDIgrv

— ᴋʟᴀᵾs (@tinyklaus) June 12, 2023

Oh and by the way, China and Russia have also been reverse engineering alien technology, but unlike the USA, have been doing so unethically.

Of course Grusch’s testimony coincides well with strange stories passed off as “news” across ALL mainstream media outlets of US fighter jets successfully shooting down UFOs invading the lower 48 states from Canada. How much longer will we wait before holographic technology will start blaring images of aliens over cities of the world in a bid to unite the world around a common threat (or maybe create a few new UFO-driven religions in the process)?

Predictive Programming 101

While you might think that this barrage of UFO-truth is coming out of nowhere, it’s effectiveness was only made possible by decades of predictive programming embedding storylines into the public’s imagination wearing the form of dystopic hellscapes, alien invasions, and stories of UFO disclosure financed by operations like Netflix (run by Edward Bernays’ grand nephew) and Tom DeLonge’s CIA-run To The Stars Academy. Not only has the CIA been found to be behind the vetting, funding, and production of thousands of films across the decades, but has also worked aggressively alongside other integrated intelligence networks under London’s vast Five Eyes octopus to conduct psychological warfare onto the populations living within the Trans Atlantic nations under the helm of such projects as MK Ultra and its myriad of affiliated programs.

But before UFO stories were cooked in the CIA’s kitchen in preparation for the grand unveiling of an inevitable alien invasion that would unite the world into a common front, the blueprint had been laid out by a leading operative of Britain’s 12 man Propaganda Bureau during World War One. This operative’s name was Herbert George Wells and his sci-fi classic War of the Worlds (written in 1897) became the fuel that induced mass panic across New York on October 30, 1938 just as a new world war was beginning across the Atlantic Ocean. It was on this evening that the Rockefeller Foundation bankrolled a two hour news feed of H.G. Wells’ alien invasion story while passing it off to a listening audience as an actual news feed blurring the line between fantasy and reality. Hundreds of confused radio-listeners stormed onto the streets believing earth was under attack and the social engineers watching the human zoo learned something useful about mass hysteria and alien stories.

H.G. Wells is best known for such fiction works as The War of the Worlds, The World Set Free, The Invisible Man, The Island of Doctor Morrow, and The Time Machine.

However Wells’ lesser-known non-fiction writings like The Open Conspiracy, The New World Order, The Outline of History, The Science of Life, and The World Brain served as guiding strategic blueprints for the entire 20th century war against sovereign nation states and the very idea of a society built on the premise of mankind made in the image of God. Before we can understand the grand design set into motion by Wells, we must first look to Wells’ mentor Thomas Huxley.

Thomas Huxley’s Revolution

The members of the London-centered oligarchy to which Wells had devoted himself at an early age had found themselves stuck in a rut by the turn of the 19th century. These inbred families and retainers who managed the dying British Empire had long been encrusted by the vices of decadence by the time a young man of low breeding and high talent arose amidst the London-ghettos treating syphilis patients as a surgeon’s assistant. This young surgeon’s name was Thomas Huxley.

Huxley possessed a sardonic wit, a deep misanthropy, and an intelligence that were soon discovered by powerful patrons, and by his mid-20’s, this young man found himself a rising star in Britain’s Royal Academy of Science. Here he quickly became a leading creative force, shaping Britain’s powerful X Club, serving as Darwin’s bulldog promoting popular debates featuring himself against literalist members of the clergy. In these debates he argued for Darwin’s chaos-bound interpretation of evolution. He also founded Nature magazine as a propaganda instrument which has been used to enforce scientific consensus favorable to a world empire to this very day.

Huxley chose his opponents carefully, ensuring that he could easily and publicly obliterate the arguments of simple-minded Anglican clergy, and thus convince all onlookers that the only choice they had to account for the evolution of new species was either literal Biblical creationism or his brand of Darwinian evolution. The many alternative scientific theories of the 19th century (such as those found in the works of Karl Ernst von Baer, Georges Cuvier, Lamarck and James D. Dana) which accounted for both the evolution of species, and the harmonics of all parts to a whole, as well as creative leaps, were forgotten amidst this false dichotomy.

Wells Picks up Huxley’s Torch

During his later years, Huxley mentored a young Herbert George Wells, together with a whole generation of new imperial practitioners of the arts of social engineering (and social Darwinism). This social engineering soon took the form of Galton’s eugenics quickly becoming an accepted science practiced across the western world.

Wells was himself the son of a lowly gardener, but, like Huxley, exhibited a strong misanthropic wit, passion, and creativity lacking in the high nobility, and he was thus raised from the lower ranks of society into the order of oligarchical management by the 1890s. During this moment of vast potential and — it cannot be restated enough — the oligarchical order that had grown overconfident during the 200+ years of hegemony were petrified to see the nations of the earth rapidly breaking free from this hegemony thanks to the international spread of Lincoln’s American System across Germany, Russia, Japan, South America, France, Canada, and even China with Sun Yat-sen’s 1911 republican revolution.

As outlined in volume one of ‘The Clash of the Two Americas’, the oligarchy just no longer seemed to have the creative vitality and sophistication required to snuff out these revolutionary flames.

Wells described this problem in the following terms:

The undeniable contraction of the British outlook in the opening decade of the new century is one that has exercised my mind very greatly… Gradually, the belief in the possible world leadership of England had been deflated by the economic development of America and the militant boldness of Germany. The long reign of Queen Victoria, so prosperous, progressive and effortless, had produced habits of political indolence and cheap assurance. As a people we had got out of training, and when the challenge of these new rivals became open, it took our breath away at once. We did not know how to meet it…

The science of population control advanced by Huxley, Galton, Wells, Mackinder, Milner, and Bertrand Russell was the basis for a new scientific priesthood and “world government” that would put a stop to the startling disequilibrium unleashed by the electric spread of sovereign nation states, protectionism, and commitment to scientific and technological progress.

Fabians, Round Tablers and Coefficients: New Think Tanks Emerge

H.G. Wells, Russell, and other early social engineers of this new priesthood organized themselves in several interconnected think tanks known as 1) the Fabian Society of Sidney and Beatrice Webb which operated through the London School of Economics, 2) the Round Table Movement begun by the fortunes left to posterity by the racist diamond magnate Cecil Rhodes which also gave rise to the Rhodes Trust, and Rhodes Scholarship programs established to indoctrinate young talent in the halls of Oxford, and finally 3) the Co-Efficients Club of London.

Wells described the rise of these original think tanks and documented the inner elite’s inability to meet the challenge of the times saying:

Our ruling class, protected in its advantages by a universal snobbery was broad-minded, easy going and profoundly lazy… Our liberalism was no longer a larger enterprise, it had become a generous indolence. But minds were waking up to this. Over our table at St Ermin’s Hotel wrangle Maxse, Bellairs, Hewins, Amery and Mackinder, all stung by the small but humiliating tale of disasters in the South African war, all sensitive to the threat of business recession, and all profoundly alarmed by the naval and military aggressiveness of Germany.

Fearful of the prospect of a US-Russia-German alliance for progress outlined in depth by Fabian/Roundtable members Halford Mackinder and Lord Alfred Milner, the solution was simple: kick over the chess board and get everyone to just slaughter each other.

In the wake of the destruction which left nine million dead on all sides and ruined countless lives, Wells, Russell and the Milner Roundtable became leading voices for world government under the League of Nations (c. 1919) advocating “enlightened cosmopolitanism” to replace the era of “selfish nation states.”

The Battle For World Government

A decade after its founding, the League was less successful than Wells and his co-thinkers would have liked, with nationalists from around the world recognizing the evil hand of empire lurking behind the apparent language of “liberal values and world peace.” Sun Yat-sen, among many others was among the anti-Wellsian voices and warned his fellow Chinese in 1924 not to fall into this trap saying:

The nations which are employing imperialism to conquer others and which are trying to maintain their own favored positions as sovereign lords of the whole world are advocating cosmopolitanism [aka: global governance/globalization -ed] and want the world to join them… Nationalism is that precious possession by which humanity maintains its existence. If nationalism decays, then when cosmopolitanism flourishes we will be unable to survive and will be eliminated.

In response to this patriotic resistance, a new strategy had to be concocted. This took the form of H.G. Welles’ 1928 The Open Conspiracy: Blueprint for a World Revolution. This little-known book served as a guiding blueprint for the next century of imperial grand strategy calling for a new world religion and social order. According to Wells:

The old faiths have become unconvincing, unsubstantial and insincere, and though there are clear intimations of a new faith in the world, it still awaits embodiment in formulae and organizations that will bring it into effective reaction upon human affairs as a whole.

In his book, Welles outlines the need for a new scientific gospel to supersede the Judeo-Christian faiths of the western world. This new gospel consisted of a series of tomes which he and his colleague Julian Huxley composed, entitled: 1) The Outline of History (1920) where Wells re-wrote all of history wishing this analysis to replace the book of Genesis, 2) The Science of Life (1930), co-written with Sir Julian Huxley and 3) The Work, Wealth and Happiness of Mankind (1932).

Part of this immense project to create a new coherent synthetic religion to re-organize humanity involved a re-packaging of a Darwinism that was falling out of favor with many scientists of the 1920s. They recognized its failure to account for obvious features of nature such as directionality in evolution, spirit, intention, ideas, and design.

This re-packaging took the form of the “New Evolutionary Synthesis” which attempted to save Darwin’s theory and its eugenic corollaries using Jesuit priest Pierre Teilhard de Chardin’s doctrine of the “Omega Man.” De Chardin’s system synthesized the foundation of Darwinian assumptions with an acknowledgment of evolutionary directionality, the possibility of spirit, and the existence of mind as a force of nature. The destructive slight of hand used by Chardin was that all of these “transcendent” features of design — spirit, mind, reason, etc. — were: 1) bound to a finite future point of no change which dominated and guided all apparent change in living space time, and 2) binding the world of mind and spirit to the forces of the material world. The Chardin-Huxley-Wells remix kept Darwin’s laws relevant and kept science compatible with imperial modes of social organization.

Outlining the aims of The Open Conspiracy, Wells writes: “Firstly, the entirely provisional nature of all existing governments, and the entirely provisional nature therefore, of all loyalties associated therewith; Secondly, the supreme importance of population control in human biology and the possibility it affords us of a release from the pressure of the struggle for existence on ourselves; and Thirdly, the urgent necessity of protective resistance against the present traditional drift towards war.”

By 1933, the planned bankers’ dictatorship, meant to solve the four years’ long great depression and organized during the months-long London Conference, was on the verge of being sabotaged by the recently-elected American President Franklin Delano Roosevelt[2]. It was then that Wells published a new manifesto in the form of a fiction book called ‘Shape of Things to Come: The Ultimate Revolution’. This book (soon made into a Hollywood movie directed by Wells disciple Alexander Korda), served as an early tool of mass predictive programming showcasing a world destroyed by decades of global war, pandemic, and chaos — all caused by… sovereign nation states.

The “solution” to these dark ages took the form of a masonic society of social engineers who descended from planes (Wells’ ‘Benevolent Dictatorship of the Air’) to restore order under a world government. Wells had his main character (a social psychologist) state “while the World Council was fighting for and directing and carrying on the unified World State, the Educational Control was remoulding mankind”. The social psychologists managing the World Government were “becoming the whole literature, philosophy and general thought of the world… the reasoning soul in the body of the race.”

The greatest problem to overcome, stated Wells, was “the variability of mental resistance to direction and limits set by nature to the ideal of an acquiescent cooperative world.”

Wells’ hero in the book, Gustave de Windt, was “pre-occupied by his gigantic schemes for world organization, had treated the ‘spirit of opposition’ as purely evil, as a vice to be guarded against, as a trouble in the machinery which was to be minimized as completely as possible.”

Speaking through his “fictional characters” Wells reasoned that society had to be recast afresh according to a scientific priesthood which knew how to make the sorts of “hard” decisions that the dirty masses would never have the wits to make themselves. The theme of world government and collectivization of wealth under one central command were also themes advanced by Wells who wrote in 1940:

Collectivisation means the handling of the common affairs of mankind by a common control responsible to the whole community. It means the suppression of go-as-you-please in social and economic affairs just as much as in international affairs. It means the frank abolition of profit-seeking and of every device by which human beings contrive to be parasitic on their fellow man. It is the practical realisation of the brotherhood of man through a common control.