Throughout most of Christian history, Jews were regarded as the Tribe of Christ-Killers. Whether or not the Jews of Old were most responsible for the death of Jesus, the Jews of Now can certainly take the title(with pride or shame) of Christianity-Killers. In the West, Christianity hasn’t merely been weakened. It’s been effectively pimped, groomed, raped, and murdered(though there are holdouts in the Orthodox sphere). What lingers under the label of ‘Christianity’ is Zombie-Christianity. It’s like a conch, all shell and no life. Christian churches remain standing but the soul is gone. Without the soul, the body perishes.

Would Christianity be alive and well if it weren’t for the ascendancy of Jewish Power? Perhaps not. Surely, advances in sciences and secular knowledge would have led to the erosion of spiritual faith just the same. Also, the rise of prosperity and consumerism would have favored sensual pleasure over spiritual concerns. Indeed, the rise of modernity led to the fading of religions everywhere(though one could argue that the emergence of Iran as an Islamic Republic set the template for the ‘civilizational states’ that some scholars argue are rising in Russia, China, and elsewhere).

Furthermore, there were plenty of anti-religious and anti-clerical forces among Non-Jewish Humanity(or NJH). Still, there is a difference between the weakening of a culture/faith and its utter degradation, defilement, & demise. It’s the difference between an old man dying peacefully in bed and being tormented in his last days. The fact is Christianity has been dragged through the mud and effectively murdered in the Christian West, and much of the blame(or credit depending on how one looks at it) must fall on the Jews.

Arguably, the impact of Killing Christianity will be far graver than the Killing of Christ. After all, Jesus needed to be killed or ‘sacrificed’ in order for His spiritual seed to take root and sprout, thereby offering the fruit of salvation to mankind. Thus, the Jewish Killing of Christ(if indeed they played the crucial role in His death as the Gospels tell us) had to have been part of God’s plan. There would be no Christianity without the story of Jesus’s trial, Crucifixion, and Resurrection.

Paradoxically then, the Jews, in killing Christ, birthed Christianity, a religion born of the ‘conservative’ Jewish ‘murder’ of the Son of God and the ‘liberal’ renegade-Jewish resurrection of His memory(to be molded into myth). Even though Judas, Jewish rabbis, and Jewish mobs were cursed by Christianity for the death of Jesus, Jesus Himself knew that He would have to be sacrificed in order to fulfill God’s destiny for Him on Earth. One might even say it was like a con-game where the Jewish elites and mobs were manipulated into killing Jesus as a heretic without realizing that their act would lead to His apotheosis as the Son of God, the Messiah, the greatest spiritual Houdini act of all time. Indeed, had the Jews left Jesus alone, there would have been no myth of the Resurrection, therefore no Christianity.

Anyway, if the Jewish Killing of Jesus actually birthed a religion, the Jewish Killing of Christianity really means the end of that religion that had a great run. Many Christians, upon realizing what Jews have done, may come to hate the Jews. And even non-Christian atheists such as myself can’t help but feel a certain revulsion for what the Jews have done. Who can deny the greatness of Christianity as a religion, history, and culture? To befoul such a religion as the Jews have done is unpardonable… and yet, maybe Jews are once again acting as a necessary agent in history. Perhaps, the time has finally come for Christianity to fade into the night and be replaced by something else of the new dawn. Maybe the Jewish Killing of Christianity(a kind of Negative-Prophecy or Anti-Prophecy) will herald a New Age of Prophets striving for a New Vision, New Foundation, and New Destiny for the West. When even a dunderhead like Mike Cernovich can read the writing on the wall — Christianity as moral/spiritual force is all but dead or zombified — , maybe it is time for the West to forge a new path for itself.

People of the West mustn’t forget the historical role of Christianity and should always honor its memory, but what is dead is dead(unless someone conceives of an inspired reformulation of Christianity that resurrects it as a spiritual force once again). What is dead must be buried and honored, but it makes no sense to pretend it is still alive. A dead horse is a dead horse. Even with the best taxidermy, the apparently upright creature is lifeless and stiff. Only a fool would saddle it and climb on top.

The proof of Christianity’s death can be seen in its passive resignation and/or humiliating self-abasement before its enemies. Consider: Even though modernity has weakened religious authorities all over the world, there remains Islam’s muscular and proud push-back against some of the excesses of materialist society. No doubt that some Islamic reactions have been excessive, ugly, and even demented, but the fact that Muslims are still capable of being outraged by what they deem to be an affront to their faith is proof that Islam still has a pulse. Islam submits to Allah, not to the Other. In contrast, current Christianity is all about apologizing to the Other, atoning before the Other, aiding the Other, submitting to the Other, and appeasing the Other.

Now, the element of atonement in Christianity has often been a positive influence on European and American history. Indeed, how could there have been moral progress, redress, and reform without the capacity of being confessional, self-critical, and mindful of others? There is no doubt that Christianity, like all credo-systems, has been guilty of many abuses and hypocrisies, and if the Christian world made more moral advancement than the Islamic one, it owed to a deeper sense of guilt, atonement, and redemption premised on a profounder understanding of morality and justice.
While Muhammad was a political and pragmatic as well as a spiritual and moral figure, Jesus pursued spiritual purity and practiced even unto death what He preached. The element of guilt and conscience is clearly more resonant in Christianity. (And yet, in some ways, Christianity has been more arrogant on the basis that its founder is the Son of God, the Messiah Himself, than merely a Prophet, what Muhammad claimed to be.)

When Western Christians had command and control of their own social orders, narratives, spirituality, and moral/intellectual institutions, they could utilize Christian Morality in ways that suited them best. It could be used as a crusading hammer against enemies & heretics or a moral whip to flagellate one’s own moral betrayals. Christianity could be self-critical and reformist when the West was secure and confident, also more judgmental and aggressive in rivalry with outsiders and other civilizations.
But once Jews took over the institutions & industries of the West, gained control of the information, and planted new narratives into elite goy minds(who, in trickle-down effect, passed them to mass minds as well), Christianity was no longer the sword & shield of the West. Not only were the new breeds of Christians profoundly affected by the Worldview enforced by Jews in media and academia but even those Christians who resisted the New Narrative came under tremendous social, cultural, economic, and political pressure to fall in line(or else). So, if any Christian still insisted that Jews killed Christ or that Jews will burn in Hell unless they accept Jesus, he was effectively an outcast even among his spiritual peers.

But, things got even worse. Christianity didn’t just become overly conscientious and pathologically afflicted with the cult of guilt(especially vis-a-vis Jews who lack a sense of reciprocity and mutuality) but became utterly ‘cucked’ and corrupted in service of the New Boss. Though excessive conscientiousness is dangerous and suicidal, there is at least a consistency in its moral logic and sincerity(like with the raped nun in BAD LIEUTENANT by Abel Ferrara). If white Christians really do feel that they betrayed Jesus’s teachings by having committed various ‘historical sins’ and need to atone and make amends, there is at least the saving grace of goodwill(no matter how naive, foolish, and suicidal it may well be).

However, much of Current Christianity is mostly about sucking up to the New Power and committing yet more(and potentially even greater) historical crimes in appeasement to it. Take scumbags like John Bolton and Mitt Romney. Both claim to be Good Christians and make noises about celebrating Diversity and rejecting White Consciousness to make up for past crimes of ‘white supremacism’. Then, one might expect them to condemn ALL forms of supremacism and call upon the world to choose peace over war.
To the contrary, these servile dogs are so enamored of Jewish Power that they go to any length(and sink to any depth) to bark & bite and destroy entire parts of the World to win doggy-biscuit wafers from the Masters of Zion.

So many American Evangelicals claim to feel oh-so-very-sorry about Slavery and myriad other American ‘sins’. They say they love, love, and love Jews and condemn the slightest whiff of ‘antisemitism’ to make amends for the centuries of Christian hostility toward Jews. But, these very same people are totally supportive of the Military-Industrial Complex that warmongers around the world and destroys any people hated by Jews(and homos). As the godly Jews fawn on homos the most, Christ-Cucks also bend over to the homos.

Is the promotion of Globo-Homo-mania(now rife even in the Mormon and Evangelical churches) really about reforming Christianity to live up to Jesus’s true teachings? Was Jesus and Disciples really about ‘non-discrimination’ against sexual deviants? Where does one find that in the Old or New Testament? And even if we were to argue that what matters more is the ‘spirit’ than the ‘letter’ of the Gospels and that the true message of Jesus was ‘love’, how can there be any religion or spiritual order without judgment, which necessitates some form of discrimination?

After all, isn’t it more difficult to enter Heaven than Hell precisely because God discriminates against blasphemers and those who refuse to accept His Truth? While one could legitimately argue that Christianity is open to all sinners — even the worst and most depraved among us — , it is nevertheless on condition that the sinners confess, repent, and try their best to be men and women in search of salvation. Without conditions, Christianity is useless, which is true of any religion or ideology. Without conditions, Christianity might as well be open to polytheistic pagan witches.
Or take Judaism. Without discrimination based on fusion of faith and blood, just about anyone could claim to be a Jew. Then, what would happen to Judaism or the meaning of what it means to be ‘Jewish’? While religions do and indeed must come under reformist pressures — all religions progressed and changed over time — , there is a limit beyond which the thought-system falls apart and loses meaning. Similarly, an elite institution can bend the rules a bit and use stuff like ‘affirmative action’ to let in people who aren’t the smartest, but if the gates were flung open to all comers, it would no longer be an elite institution, period.

Surely, if the Christian Church opens its arms to repentant murderers, it should be open to homos who repent as well. The problem is that Homomaniacs refuse to regard their sexual deviancy as a sin and repent. If anything, they demand that the Church bend over and celebrate homosexuality as a blessing of God(even the highest blessing).

This is why stuff like ‘gay marriage’ is EVIL. While homosexuality in and of itself, as a sexual deviancy, isn’t necessarily evil, making it out to be something it is not can be evil. Take tobacco for example. Smoking itself isn’t evil. It’s unhealthy and addictive and as such could be deemed a vice. Still, some people derive a measure of pleasure from it, and there are surely far worse drugs.
However, if the medical community were to announce that smoking is GOOD for your health, that would be evil as the experts would be derelict in their duty and would be pushing a falsehood for whatever reason. It would mean corruption and mendacity.
Likewise, homosexuality merely as homosexuality is either a sexual deviancy, weirdness, or perversion(which too isn’t necessarily evil). But when ‘the best and the brightest’ place homo-fecal penetration on the same(or even higher) biological and moral plane with real sexuality, that is evil, and it is the foundation of this monstrosity called ‘gay marriage’ or ‘same-sex marriage’.
Similarly, a man who pretends to be a woman isn’t necessarily evil. He may be silly, ridiculous, and goofy in the head, but being deluded doesn’t mean one’s evil. But when the scientific community pushes the crazy concept that a man is a woman because he says so(and it is ‘hate speech’ to reject his claim), it’s a sign not only of corruption but a kind of madness that reeks of evil.
It’s the difference between saying 2 + 2 = 5(which is incorrect but not evil) and insisting that you accept the ‘truth’ of that formulation(as in George Orwell’s 1984), which is evil. When facts cave to fantasy and when reason surrenders to unreason(for whatever rationale), it’s a sign that a kind of satanism has taken hold of that part of the world. Behind the institutional inversion of all that is true and real is the Jewish Power, now the most evil force in the world as the master of the Empire of Lies.

Now, one could argue that being ‘gay’ is different from committing murder. Murder is an act whereas being homosexual is a condition which one has no control over. Since homos were born ‘gay’, they must have been ‘created’ that way by God. Since God made them that way, could one argue that homosexuality is a blessing of God, therefore to be valued?
The problem with such an argument is that all humans, straight or homo, are born with all sorts of dark, dangerous, and deranged drives. We have within us the capacity to kill, steal, rape, and/or revel in mayhem. It’s like even good little dogs can ‘go wolf’ like bloodthirsty predators.

So, just because we were born with certain ‘conditions’ doesn’t mean those are good or the blessings of God. Some people are born with conditions that predispose them toward greater likelihood to become compulsive liars, cheats, sadists, alcoholics, drug-addicts, thieves, rapists, and/or murderers. Most of us have the potential to be killers but are not natural-born killers. Some people are born with higher-level of killer-instinct and have a greater likelihood to become psychopaths, serial killers, or sociopathic gangster-mercenaries. They are born with such conditions.

Still, they can resist their natural instincts by the grace of God or, even if they do succumb to their darker instincts, they can still seek salvation through confession and repentance. Studies have shown that most pedophiles are predisposed to be sexual perverts. It isn’t as if, one day, they just freely chose to be degenerate. Something within them propels them to sexualize children just like something within homos makes them search out butts to bugger.

That said, a condition isn’t the same as action. One can be tempted to do something but still restrain oneself, perhaps with the grace of God(though it’s nearly impossible with the Negroes whose savage genes are too powerful). Or one can indulge in sin but still make an honest effort to confess and purge oneself. And in that sense, the Church must be and indeed is open to all.

After all, Jesus looked upon the mob that cheered His death with sadness than anger. He believed that even such wretches could have a change of heart and choose the righteous path(through Him). But, the nasty and narcissistic homos won’t have any of that. They insist that homo fecal penetration, ass-buggery, and bung-donging are not only glorious but blessed by God and Jesus. Instead of homos repenting before God and Jesus, God and Jesus must pander to homo as if the Kingdom of Heaven is some bath-house in the sky for fruity globalist elites, who really are a bunch of hipster-hicks with too much money and no taste.

These scumbags are into self-worship. Get a load of that globo-homo demento Tim Cook who says God blessed him with the desire to indulge in buggery. Right, God equipped him with a dong to be smeared with fecal matter and with a bung to be penetrated by the dongs of men. This vile disgusting elitist has the temerity to preach to us about ‘sin’ while pledging(just like Mitt Romney and John Bolton) to work with Jewish globalist-supremacists to shut down dissident speech of those who dare speak truth to power.
Needless to say, Tim Cook totally supports the Zionist tyranny over Palestinians and uses Apple to shut down BDS along with Dissident Right voices. Homos prize their junior-partnership with Jews who use the globo-homo banner as the battle flag of the New-Jew-Supremacism. Globo-Homo is Shlomo indeed. It’s hard to stomach the sheer putridity of this orgiastic cabal of supremacist degenerates whose highest value is their own preening vanity and their flavor-of-the-month vices.

How did Christianity go from a religion that commanded sinners to repent to a cuck-cult that bends over to homo dongs, elevates Negro demagogues, and sucks Zionist-supremacist cock? There are various explanations, but the most important reason is its having caved to the will of the Jews as the Holy Holocaust people with the highest moral-spiritual authority in the world.

Why was this fatal to Christianity? Didn’t Jews indeed suffer greatly in World War II? Couldn’t one argue that the animus against Jews that led to the Shoah partly stemmed from centuries of Christian hostility and distrust? Besides, Jews constituted just a tiny minority in the Christian West.
So, why not indulge the Jews somewhat? Given the gravity of the Shoah, maybe Jews were owed special sympathy. And maybe the tragedy imbued the Jews with wisdom and understanding beyond those of goyim.

But such assumptions were a huge mistake on the part of Christian goyim. It was one thing for goyim to acknowledge the horror of the Shoah and give Jews their due as one of the great tragic peoples of the 20th century. But over-defining Jewishness in relation to the Shoah overshadowed the other side of Jewish history in the modern world. While the 20th century had its dark and tragic moments for Jews, it was also an era of towering Jewish triumph. Same could be said of Germans, Japanese, and Chinese. They all suffered greatly, deservedly or not, but they also made tremendous gains.
Furthermore, just as the Japanese, Germans, Chinese, Anglos, Russians, and other goyim committed evils as well as did good, Jews not only suffered horribly during World War II but played key roles in world events that led to the death and destruction of millions of innocents.

And, in the 21st century, Jews are, far and away, the greatest force of evil in the world. In other words, one should never go too easily on a great people, and Jews are a very great people, good or bad. Going easy on Jews is not like going easy on, say, Eskimos or Hawaiians. White folks can indulge Eskimos and Hawaiians all they want as them folks will never amount to much to make a difference in the world. Your average Eskimo(or Inuit) just wants to drink cheap whiskey and chew on blubber. Or, make false teeth out of wolf bones to get a chick. A fat Hawaiian is content with a bag of Doritos, case of Pepsi, burnt pig, and TV in front of his couch-potato self.

In contrast, it’s hard to think of another people as driven, ambitious, intelligent, clever, energetic, paranoid, vengeful, nasty, vicious, vile, brilliant, inspired, insightful, penetrating, sadistic, cruel, neurotic, resentful, arrogant, envious, exasperating, contemptuous, monomaniacal, egomaniacal, megalomaniacal, self-righteous, deceitful, visionary, prophetic, and manic-and-panic-prone as the Jews. Jews are quite a handful alright. If you give Jews an inch, they take a mile. If you give them a mile, they take a light year. Give them a light year, and they take the entire cosmos. It’s like there’s a big difference between feeding a goldfish and a crocodile. The latter can bite your arm off in the bargain.

This is why one should be warm of heart but cold of head when dealing with the Problematic Other. Sure, because of the tragedy of Shoah, amends had to be made. Jewish suffering had to be acknowledged and remembered. A cold heart is a dead heart. But then, a fuzzy head is close to braindead. The mind must always be cold, and the White West and Christian Church should have been cold in assessing the Way of the Jew. They should have pondered without mushiness and sentimentality, “Given what we know about the Jewish Tribal Character, what would they do IF we indulged them and elevated them as morally equal or even superior to us Christians?” This question wasn’t raised, and the result is the Globo-Homo-Shlomo World all around us.

Christianity should NEVER have let go of its conviction of spiritual and moral superiority over the Jews. Of course, Jews need not agree with anything about the teachings of the Christian Church. From the Jewish Perspective, THEY THEMSELVES are morally and spiritually superior. They are the Original People of the Book. They are the Chosen. They are the ones who made God known to other peoples. In order for Judaism and Jewish Identity to have validity, Jews must cling to their own sense of specialness and superiority. If Jews decide to believe that their blood, culture, and religion are no more special than those of all other peoples, cultures, and religions around the world, there would hardly be a compelling reason for Jews to cling to Jewishness. In order for Jews to preserve and maintain their blood, culture, history, and territory, they must believe in their own specialness.

This goes for Muslims too. Muslims must believe that their religion is superior, the final vision and message of the Last Great Prophet for Mankind. Without such conviction and certitude, what is the point of being a Muslim or trying to convert others?

Then, the same logic applies to Christianity. Whatever Jews or Muslims(or Hindus or Buddhists) may think or feel, Christians must believe that their religion is the true religion. Their Messiah is the true Messiah. God and Fate are on their side. Without such conviction, could Christianity have lasted as long as it did since the Fall of the Roman Empire? Of course not. If Christianity wasn’t an improvement on Judaism, a perfectly fine religion according to Neo-Christians, what was the whole purpose of founding a new faith in the first place? Likewise, Protestantism gained validity only in rebellion against Catholicism as, if there was nothing wrong with the latter, what was the whole point of creating the former that led to divisions and bloody strife?

Now, it’s necessary for peoples of different creeds and customs to tolerate one another and get along in the world. In the age of nuclear weapons, the last thing we need is one bunch of people trying to forcibly convert all others. Even among Christians, sectarian conflicts led to so many deaths, e.g. Thirty Years War in which it’s been estimated one-third of the German population perished. And Sunni-Shia conflict in the aftermath of the US invasion and ‘liberation’ of Iraq resulted in deaths in the 100,000s(though some estimates go up to as high as one million). History teaches us that differences will always persist, and wherever possible, it’s better for peoples to choose peace, tolerance, and accommodation than open conflict. So, let Christian minorities maintain their customs & worship in the Muslim world, and let Muslim minorities keep their faith & rituals in the West.

That said, true conviction requires one to believe in the special and/or central meaning of one’s creed, faith, or value system. If not, why favor and prize it over all others? Whenever one chooses something of substance(than merely of style or flavor), it’s an act of preference based on one’s belief or feeling that it is worthier or holier. While it’s possible for individuals to choose and favor what they consciously deem to be inferior, most people usually choose what they deem to be superior. So, while it’s possible that some will consciously choose silver or bronze over gold, most people choose gold. Of course, what glitters like ‘gold’ differs in the eyes of the beholder. To Muslims, Islam is the gold standard of spirituality. To Jews, it’s Judaism. To Christians, it must be Christianity. And, it must be that way.

Now, some may argue that Christianity demands of its believers to favor the inferior over the superior. Jesus preached that we should give up our comforts & wealth and go among the poor. Choose the inferior poor and wretched over the superior rich and privileged. But in the eyes of Jesus, being poor(especially in accepting poverty as a virtuous path to spiritual salvation) is superior to being rich, which may be superficially impressive but rings hollow because wealth is the product of prioritizing the material world.

Anyway, if most people don’t choose the very best, it’s because they can’t afford or make the cut. Most people in state colleges would prefer to attend elite colleges IF they could. Most people who drive a standard car would prefer to drive a luxury car if they could afford it. Because it doesn’t cost much in material terms to become a Christian, Muslim, or Buddhist, one must choose or hold onto one’s faith on the conviction that it is the best form of spirituality. If one is a Christian but sincerely believes Islam is the true faith, then he or she should convert to Islam. Why keep with a faith that one no longer believes or believes is inferior to another?

Religion, especially a credo-religion(as opposed to an ethno-religion like Judaism or Hinduism), demands sincerity. It’s not like a marriage where a man or woman sticks with the spouse even though he or she could ‘do better’ by leaving him or her and going off with someone else. In marriage, there is something higher than the individuals involved. Their bond and pledge to another — ‘til death do us apart’ — count for most. In religion, most important is one’s sincerity of faith.
Even in cases where one has sworn devotion to a certain god or set of gods, if he comes to believe in the greater truth of another god or another faith, he should switch to the latter. In a way, spirituality is both promiscuous and faithful. Many people switch faiths, going from one religion to another or from one sect to another, and in this, they are not being loyal. And yet, in their search for the highest eternal truth, they are always searching for the same thing. No matter which vehicle they hop into, they are headed toward the same destination: The Ultimate Truth.

Because of the nature of religion and spirituality, the ONLY kind of people who deserve respect are those with true conviction rooted in the foundation of their faith. So, even though I’m an atheist, I respect a Christian who believes there is no Salvation for me until I seek out Jesus. If the so-called Christian says that I don’t have to believe in God or Jesus to enter Heaven because he doesn’t want to hurt my feelings, I would feel no respect for him. It’s like when a boxer enters a ring. He respects the opponent who came to rumble. Win or lose, a boxer often hugs his opponent after the bout because both came with the determination to settle things in the ring. No boxer would respect an opponent who entered the ring just to smile and hug on account that hitting back might hurt the other fella’s feelings. This is why, despite the Jewish hatred for Muslims, there remains a grudging respect. Muslims mean business. They aren’t pathetic dogs who cuck to Jews. For long, Saudis acted like dogs, and Jews didn’t respect them much. But Jews do respect Iranians despite the boiling hatred. Why? Iranians don’t cuck. (As for the Saudis, even though they politically cuck to US and Israel, at the very least they don’t cuck to globo-homo degeneracy.)

In contrast, Jews feel nothing but contempt for Current Christianity because it’s no longer rooted in true conviction and spiritual vision but in brown-nosing Jews, Negroes, and Homos above all. MLK and Mandela are now bigger than God and Jesus in the West. Worshiping Shoah and Israel is bigger than Heaven and Hell. Bending over to homo vanity and tranny narcissism has become the new communion or cum-union. So-called Christians are more offended by ‘racism’, ‘homophobia’, or ‘antisemitism’ than by the worst kind of blasphemy against God and Jesus or the worst kind of defamation leveled at Christians and the Church. Your average worthless Mormon or Mainline pansy is more offended by a ‘gay joke’ than by vicious things said about God, Jesus, and the Church.

Suppose Jesus appeared in our time and Jews whipped him and spat on him, Negroes ‘twerked’ in front of him and bump-n-grinded him, and Homos demanded he bend over and take it up the arse; and in response to their taunts and mockery, Jesus condemned Jewish perfidy, black savagery, and homo degeneracy. Most likely, American Christians would pile on Jesus and condemn him of ‘antisemitism’, ‘racism’, and ‘homophobia’ than stand by his side. That is how low the Current Christianity has fallen, a sure sign that Jewish Power has indeed murdered Christianity because no true religion would degrade itself to such levels of humiliation and debasement, worse humiliation and debasement sincerely valued as improvements on the faith.

Why was it especially foolish for Christians to get fuzzy-wuzzy warm in the head about the Jews? After World War II, they regarded Jews as a sorry and tragic people deserving of sympathy and a helping hand. So, they figured on toning down Christian dogma and moralism to make things nicer for Jews(and more in tune with the prevailing fashions). No more stuff about Jews as Christ-Killers or how they may be holocausted forever in Hell by the New Testament God(unless they repent and convert to Christianity).

This was naive wishful-thinking because Jews are not an ordinary people. They are a great people, in both the best and worst sense. Therefore, unless Jewish Power is pushed back, it will keep pushing and pushing until you’ve gone over the cliff. It’s like there’s a difference between being nice to a dog or cat and being nice to a tiger or hippo. Or to weasels, which are small but, pound-for-pound, among the most ferocious, tenacious, relentless, and resilient species in the world. And, not for nothing have Jews been compared with rodents. Rats are a great species. Not the most pleasant but among the most adaptive, resourceful, unrelenting, and obsessive. So many impressive species have gone extinct over the years, but rats still remain among the most successful species ever. Unlike most species that are adapted to a specific environment, rats can live just about anywhere. Likewise, most goy cultures tend to fall apart when pulled from their roots and robbed of their roofs. But Jews have maintained their identity and culture even in diaspora over millenniums because of the Covenant that bonded blood with spirituality and history.

In contrast, Christianity doesn’t guarantee, ensure, or demand the survival of any particular ethnos or culture. If a Jew neglects his own history and identity, he can’t be Jewish. Jewishness isn’t merely a credo, a belief in an abstract set of ideas. It is about blood, history, and spirituality bound into a bundle, a fasces. In some ways, the modern formulation of Judaism, or more precisely Jewishism, was the ‘first fascism’, and it may explain the Jewish anxiety about fascism as something that should belong to them alone and to no other. (Similarly, Jews love nuclear weapons in Israel but fear the idea of Iran or some Arab country having them. Of course, when Jews use fascism, it’s called something else — ‘democracy’ — , just like Israel’s possession of nukes goes obfuscated whereas the merest prospect of Iran having nukes is blared all across the world as an existential threat of global nuclear annihilation.)
Whereas a Jew mustn’t deny his identity and history to remain as a Jew, a Christian may feel even more Christian with the rejection of his blood and history. If an Irishman or a Chinese declares before a Christian Church, “I don’t care about my Irishness or Chineseness, I don’t care about my Irish or Chinese history & heritage as all I care about is being a good Christian”, the Church will welcome him(and even praise him for abandoning his particular identity and loyalties). While Christianity doesn’t require one to abandon one’s identity, it is irrelevant to being a Good Christian.

Furthermore, despite the long histories of Christian civilizations and their various churches, there is no essential Christian history(as an indispensable element of spiritual validity). While it’s impossible to conceive of Judaism without taking into account the story of the Jews as told in the Torah, Christianity would be just as spiritually-and-morally valid without the slightest knowledge of its 2,000 yr history. The entirety of Christianity was embodied in the single lifetime of Jesus who died at the age of 33(oddly, the year in which Hitler came to power). Christianity is based on biography, Judaism on history. According to the Faith, Jesus was the Messiah, the Son of God, and He revealed the Final and Eternal Truth. So, there is no need to look back or forward to gain salvation, especially as Jesus had a weakness for the ignorant and simpleminded, the meek. Core Christianity says He has blessed Mankind, and that’s that. Christianity took hold as the spiritual equivalent to the End of History.

In contrast, History is crucial for the Jews because the Torah is a history of Truth as revealed in increments by the Prophets. Torah is a mytho-historical puzzle, and the Talmud is a literary manual of working on the puzzle(often for purposes that could only be deemed nefarious in the eyes of goyim and conscientious Jews). And since Jews don’t believe the world has been blessed by the Messiah(as true Christians believe) or by the Final Prophet(as the Muslims believe), more truth is yet to be unearthed in the future, a kind of archaeo-futurism. Because Jews are still in the truth-seeking mode, they are intellectually and culturally more engaged than the Christians and Muslims are. (Neo-Pagans of the Renaissance and the 19th Century Romanticism were notably creative in ideas and expression because, like the Jews, they looked into the past to move into the future.)

Anyway, against a people as strong-willed and prophetic-minded as the Jews, the Christian West needed a powerful push-back mechanism. It needn’t be extreme like National Socialism, but there had to be something. It’s like a lion-tamer needs a strong whip and sturdy chair to remind the lion not to get too aggressive. Without defenses against Jews, they can gnaw you into pieces like the rats about to carve up Winston Smith in 1984(by George Orwell) or drive you crazy like the Marx Brothers with their hapless goy victims in their movies. Without the cage to hold back the rats, Winston Smith’s face would have been devoured to the bone. This is why Christianity always needed a Cage against the Jews. It was the ONLY WAY to keep Jews from attacking and defiling Christianity as an affront to the true Covenant between God and the Chosen. Jews regarded Christianity as a stolen religion, and in a way, it was. Remember the movie TIME BANDITS(by Terry Gilliam) where god is pursuing a bunch of dwarfs who stole the Secret from him? Jews see Jesus and the Disciples(and especially St. Paul) in this manner: Renegade dwarf-Jews who stole the sanctity of the covenant and passed it on to God-forsaken gentiles.

Jews were understandably upset because, not only was their God stolen via Christianity but the New Religion blamed them of Deicide, the handy and oft-used justification for hostility against Jews(even when Jews rubbed goyim the wrong way for non-religious reasons). Now, suppose a non-European people stole European gods, such as Zeus or Odin or bunch of others, reformulated them in their own image, claimed true ownership, and then invoked them in wars against Europe. White pagans surely would have been upset.

Defenders of the West are upset with the Shlomo-Globo-Homo media portraying the Great European historical figures and mythic heroes with black actors; they feel that their history, culture, and identity have been violated because their own idols are routinely ‘appropriated’ and ‘stolen’ to honor and embolden ANOTHER people, especially the blacks who pose the greatest racial-sexual threat to whites. Then, one can understand how Jews may have felt through the ages when their Book and their God were ‘stolen’ by Gentiles who claimed them as their own on the basis of the ‘New Covenant’ as formulated by St. Paul. Some may argue that it makes no sense blaming the Gentiles since it was the renegade Jews who envisioned the New Religion and preached it to non-Jews. If anyone did the ‘stealing’, it was the all-too-Jewish Early Christians. Gentiles only received contraband goods from Jews who stole from Jews.

But then, it could be argued that the Jewish Early Christians stole nothing. If anything, they first tried to share their revelation with fellow Jews, but the latter not only wouldn’t listen but attacked and even killed many Jewish Early Christians; therefore, the Early Christians had no choice but to take the New Faith to the Gentiles. Whatever may have been the case, Jews have always hated Christianity as a Stolen Religion, and on the subconscious level, their Africanization of Western Mythology and History could be a kind of payback: “You whites made the Jewish Religion into something white-and-gentile, so we Jews will make Western Civilization black-and-African.” Keep in mind that Martin Bernal, the notorious author of BLACK ATHENA, is a Jew.

Anyway, in order for Christianity to maintain its pride and prestige in the modern world, it has to remain anti-Judaic, which isn’t the same as being anti-Jewish or ‘antisemitic’. Even though Christianity was right to warn Christians not to harm Jews(at least not for the hell of it), it had to uphold a spiritual and moral doctrine that insisted upon Christianity as an advancement over Judaism and certainly Talmudism(that is filled with excuses as to why Jews may swindle, exploit, and even murder goyim). Thus, even as Christianity had an ethical duty to denounce physical violence against Jews(at least those who didn’t cause trouble), it was bound by a spiritual and moral prerogative to preach against what it believed to be the moribund or past-expiration-date religion of the Jews.

Without such an adversarial position on Judaism, Christianity had no real legs to stand on. Irrefutably, it came into existence in rebellion against Judaism like Zeus came into his own in defiance against Cronus. Though, in some ways, a continuation of Cronus, Zeus was also a usurper who took the title from his father; he wasn’t exactly Cro-Zeus. A Christianity that disavows its spiritual superiority over Judaism has no reason to exist. If there was nothing wrong with Judaism, what was the whole point of founding a new religion?
If indeed Jews are just as blessed as Christians and can enter Heaven without accepting Jesus, why even convert to Christianity? If Jews are blessed without accepting Jesus, it implies anyone can be blessed or enter Heaven without faith in Christ. It renders the life of Jesus, His Sacrifice, and Resurrection superfluous and moot because the implication is that you don’t really need Jesus to have the blessing and a ticket to Heaven. If Jews are just as blessed as Christians and can enter Heaven without accepting Jesus, then Christianity’s heart has been cut out. It means its entire premise was wrong for the entirety of its existence.

Now, some may argue that only Jews and Christians are blessed by God and Jesus. Jews are blessed because they are the Original People of God, and Christians are blessed because they are the New Peoples of God. But, this goes against the true meaning of Christianity that was something more than ‘Judaism for non-Jews’. If indeed the main point of Christianity was to offer a kind of extended membership to non-Jews in the Jewish House of God, then Jews certainly don’t need Jesus to have God’s blessing. They already had the blessing, and only non-Jews needed Jesus to serve as spiritual middleman.

But the Jesus myth and Paul’s message took hold in opposition to Jewish traditions. Gospels say Jews not only rejected Jesus but called for His death. And after His death, Jews sought out His followers to kill as well. Then, Paul came along and conceived of an idea to universalize the Jesus Myth in profound opposition to Jewish dogma, rituals, and customs.
Thus, the New Testament was something far beyond a Universalized Judaism or Judaism-for-Goy-Dummies. It was far more than a series of generic copies of the original art work to be sold to tourists. It was a new beginning, one that claimed that the Jews lost their way, forsook the blessing of God, and became most guilty in the eyes of the Lord for having killed Jesus, the Son of God and the Messiah, and then for not atoning for what they’d done.
According to the Christian Myth, Jews had long awaited the coming of the Messiah, but when He finally came, the bloody idiots had Him killed instead of welcoming Him. Still, Jews had a second chance as Jesus called for forgiveness and love. But Jews didn’t just kill Jesus but chased down every Jewish Early Christian who preached the Gospel.

There may have been a time when Jews could have remained Jewish even as they accepted Jesus. But Jewish sins against the Early Christians were so grave that the ONLY path for salvation left for Jews was by wholeheartedly accepting Jesus and becoming Christians. Such Anti-Judaicism is crucial to Christianity. Without it, Christian Myth loses its luster. If the Church says that Jews, despite what the Gospels say about them and their role in the killing of Jesus and the persecution of His followers, are just as blessed and welcome into Heaven as the Christians are, then it means Christianity has been based on what was, at best, a conceit and, at worst, a mendacious lie that defamed a wholly innocent people, the Jews. Christianity goes from a religion of being blessed to a religion of being cursed. (It’s no wonder that so-called Christians of today do little but apologize endlessly, especially to Jews, homos, and Negroes.)

In other words, Christianity goes from a religion-as-advancement from Judaism to a religion-as-abomination against Judaism. If Jews without Jesus are so blessed and guaranteed a place in Heaven, why did Christians go through all that trouble? It’d be like Benjamin Braddock saying, “You got me” when asked by his father what all that education was for in THE GRADUATE.

Christian history had its ups and downs, triumphs and tragedies, but Christians believed it was worth it(even in the darkest moments) because Christianity was the one true faith through which Mankind could be saved and redeemed. That knowledge and conviction made it all seem worthwhile through thick and thin. But now, the Church says Jews don’t need Jesus to have the blessing and entry into Heaven. And in order not to offend yet others, many churches say even Muslims, Buddhists, Agnostics, and Atheists are Okay if they are ‘good’ people with good hearts. At this point, the church might as well even embrace Satan Worshipers lest it be not ‘inclusive’ enough.

Now, it’s good for Christians to be kind with non-Christian communities. Besides, every religion needs to be patient with non-believers as true conversion and faith take time and effort, like earning a degree in the sciences. Self-righteous Christian types who get thrills by holding up signs like ‘God Hates Fags’ tend to be emotionally and even morally deficient in some way.
Still, Christian Doctrine is what it is. Without it, there is no religion. It’s the same with Buddhism that believes in reincarnation. According to the laws of Karma, eating meat is a transgression against cosmic justice. So, a meat-eater will likely be reincarnated into a goat or spider in the next life. Should a Buddhist reject the theory of Karma that punishes meat-eaters because feelings may be hurt? Or should a Jew water down his idea of the Covenant because it might offend a goy as one of the Un-Chosen?

What history teaches is that actions cannot always follow convictions. Catholics and Protestants did that for a while, and they bled each other dry in some of the bloodiest conflicts in Europe. We mustn’t expect the Kingdom of Man to ever become the Kingdom of Heaven, a lesson learned from the blood history of communism as well.
Still, the whole point of having a creed requires a degree of conviction, which requires courage. Most people don’t want to hurt other people’s feelings, and that’s a good thing, but if we mold our core beliefs on sensitivity, depth and meaning go out the window. Tolerance is useful but weak as virtue. Or, it has social value as a matter of ‘business’, a means to facilitate interaction among people with different ideas and values. After all, if people lack even this modicum of civility, we end up with self-righteous deranged mobs that attacked Charles Murray at Middlebury College. But when it comes to true conviction, one must hold steadfast to what he believes in, a quality lost on Murray who cucked on ‘gay marriage’ lest he offend his elite homo colleagues.

Because Jews are such intense people driven by ego, passion, intellect, ambition, vision, hatred, and contempt, you need something powerful to push them back. You need a dam against the Jews. It’s like the quarterback in football is helpless without the offensive linemen who push against the defensive linemen whose main objective is to sack him or smother the running back.

What was so useful about Christianity was its powerful sense of sanctity and moral superiority over the Jews, the highest practitioners of the art of sanctity. Because Christianity staked its claim on the Narrative that said Jews rejected the Son of God and even pressured the Romans to have Him killed, it put Jews on the moral defensive.
Furthermore, b