It is part of nature(and human nature) to fear and ward off the different. Nature exists in a state of terror and aggression. All organisms are hungry and seek to devour others and fear being devoured by others. Organisms seek access to organisms they want to eat and distance from organisms that would eat them.
To be sure, there are various organisms that remain oblivious to one another as they don’t regard each other as rivals, predators, or prey. Full grown trout will swim alongside full-grown carps. Sparrows, pigeons, and ducks coexist and ignore one another. Indeed, there can be more violence among similar species or within the same species than among the different species. Chimpanzees are most violent with other chimpanzees and get along better with other animals. Squirrels are often quarrelsome and aggressive with one another while ignoring skunks, opossums, and pigeons.

In some ways, organisms feel closest to their own kind but also most competitive and acrimonious. It’s one reason why some people prefer to leave their own community and go to another where they can just be strangers starting anew with a blank slate. Indeed, that’s been one of the great attractions of America.
If there were two highly tribal societies, people in Tribe A would think twice about going over to Tribe, which would regard any member from Tribe A as an outsider or even an enemy. He may be mistreated as an outcast or pressured to convert/conform to the ways of Tribe B. In a world of tribalism, it’s best to stick with your own Tribe. Despite all the acrimony, bad blood, and competition within the Tribe, you are still treated as someone who belongs.

But what if there is land where everyone’s a stranger? One may feel lonely but also liberated. One is free of tribal taboos and obligations. If you belong to Tribe A, you must carry out the duties of your Tribe, and they could be time-consuming, burdensome, or just plain boring. But if you move to a land of strangers, you have greater leeway in credo and behavior. You are no longer part of a Tribe, the consequence of which may be alienating and disorienting, but you also feel free and independent. When young adults go to college and find themselves surrounded by strangers, it can be confusing but also stimulating, as opposed to being at home(or the hometown) where you’re expected to behave in accordance with the rules of the family and/or community. Going from one’s tribal community to a land of strangers isn’t like going to another tribe. If a member of Tribe A goes over to Tribe B, he has to readjust to the narrow norms of the Other. But in the land of strangers, there is no Other as everyone is on his own.

The land of strangers may be especially appealing to a minority living in a Tribal system. For instance, if you were a Jew in Poland or Hungary, you were reminded of your Jewish minority status at all times, either by the Gentile community or your own, or both. There was the sense that Poland belongs to Poles and Hungary to Hungarians, and YOU, as a Jew, was merely a guest.

But in the land of strangers(like the US when compared to most countries), the land belongs to individuals than to a specific people. A Pole or an Hungarian in America has no more claim to the land than a Jew. Now, Anglos and Northern Europeans who founded and built America may insist on a special claim, and Jews always regarded such claim as a challenge, which explains their insistence on putting the Immigration Experience at the Center of the American Narrative.

There is another twist. Had Jews come to the US to be individuals in a land of strangers, things might not have gotten so crazy. At the very least, there would have been a consistency at the core of the New American Project: Jews, like all other groups, evolving into generic Americans and carrying on as individuals.

But, mere individuality wasn’t acceptable to Jews in America(or any part of the world). Rather, they sought to lay claim to America as uniquely theirs, indeed as the Jewel in the Crown of the Empire of Judea or World Jewry. While America would be composed of many races and ethnic groups, the goyim would all be subjects whereas Jews would be the true masters of America, at least once the WASP elites were knocked down a few pegs and rendered into subjects. (The Empire of Judea is the most powerful force in the world. The combined wealth of US Jews, Israeli Jews, European Jews, Russian Jews, Latin American Jews and etc. is far greater than the US economy.)

To an extent, like so many ethnic groups, Jews left Europe to be free of Tribalism and looked to the US as the land of free individuals. Jews appreciated(and encouraged) the erosion of tribalism, not least among the Anglos who’d founded and built America. Jews envisioned a Melting Pot of free individuals co-existing and competing with one another in a world defined by liberty, commerce, ambition, and potential.

Yet, even as white gentile tribalism and identity grew weaker, Jewish identity and tribalism grew stronger. If the rise of Anglo-American power led to WASPs conceptualizing themselves as a universal neo-imperial people spreading Americanism around the globe and taking in New Americans from all over the world, the rise of Jewish-American power led to Jews feeling more proud as Jews, Zionists, and citizens of Judea, or World Jewry.
In the land of strangers where every group was urged to abandon their tribal loyalties in favor of Americanism, Jews did the opposite even as they pushed deracination on the goyim. Jews could be very Jewish, indeed downright Judeo-centric, but all other groups were expected to be globalized, whose points of historical, cultural, and political reference must primarily center on the Holo-Cost, Homomania, and Afromania.

Oddly enough, America made Jews more Jewish than ever, or more raw-Jewish or porno-Jewish. In the Old World, one’s sense of Jewishness was hampered not only by goy wariness of ‘Semites’ but traditional spiritual strictures(whereby mere ethnicity wasn’t enough). There was also the vestiges of the aristocratic legacy and the bourgeois sense of propriety that restrained vulgar individualism and shameless liberty. In America, however, Jews found the freedom to cook up all manner of schemes and accumulate unprecedented fortunes. And it was enough to be ethnically Jewish to feel as a proud Jew in America, which meant mere power and wealth were enough for a Jew to be justified.
In the Old World, Jews sought to maintain their own spiritual tradition, assimilate into a particular nationality and even convert to the prevailing church of Christianity(to demonstrate their patriotism, be it to France, Poland, or Germany), or commit to some messianism(usually communism) as a new moral crusade.
In the US, Jews could abandon their spiritual tradition but were under no pressure to assimilate into a goy tribalism/nationalism or join a neo-universal moral cause. Even though some Jews in the US did stick to tradition, some tried to be ‘Good Americans'(and even became Christians), and some joined radical universal causes(as Jews were overrepresented among US communists), the most consequential Jews were the Neo-Jews who, freed from Jewish tradition, could formulate a new kind of Jewishness whereby the power of ethnicity was what mattered most, i.e. it was enough to be Jewish by blood as long as the Tribe amassed great fortunes, influence, and power.
And, as ‘Americanism’ became increasingly vague in its all-encompassing themes as the ‘proposition nation’, the US could become anything that the most powerful group proposed it to be, one where goyim are deracinated while Jews are ‘racinated’ into Zionism(which is about the power of Jews as ethnic-imperial overlords).
Thus, it was in the US that the full extent of Jewish Chutzpah emerged, no longer chained to Jewish spiritual/moral tradition, no longer leashed to Old World concepts of narrow nationalism, and no longer bound to a universal messianism, such as Marxism. Jewish-Americanism became a Ron-Jeremiad, or Portnoy’s Manifesto.

Anyway, what is true among humans is also true among animals. A wolf may run from other wolves and prefer to co-exist with other animals. While a wolf ideally belongs to a wolf pack, once its own pack is scattered or destroyed, it has great difficulty joining another wolf pack. Other packs may see it as a threat and kill it. In that case, a wolf has most to fear from its own kind and may seek solace as a ‘stranger’ among other species that ignore it.
People seek refuge in other nations for a similar reason. A Turk might be politically or legally persecuted by other Turks in Turkey. A Burmese may be tyrannized by other Burmese for political or whatever reasons. A Pakistani may be hounded by other Pakistanis who vie for power and dominance. Such an individual might prefer to live as a stranger in a place like the UK, Canada, Australia, or the US. Or even in Japan. He may feel lonely as a stranger but be left alone as a nonentity. This is especially true in the US where the ONLY thing that most people have in common is that they are also strangers in a strange land.

An animal that flees its own kind may seek sanctuary among humans(who can be compassionate), at least in comparison to cold and ruthless nature. After all, wolves evolved into dogs because they preferred to be with humans than with other wolves that might kill them. While humans could be brutal to animals, they could also be kind and empathetic. Also, as wolves could sense greater intelligence among humans, they looked up to humans as the guide. Animals can instinctively tell which animal is more special. Even a dog that has never encountered humans and cats will react differently to both. It will see a cat as just another animal but approach the human with far greater curiosity and wonder. Even killer whales sense something special about humans.

Humans are animals too, and even though many people feel most comfortable with their own kind, there is also the desire to be with the superior or with the inferior. This is where the Law of ‘Supremalism’ sets into motion. Supremalism can be (1) wanting to be with the superior people than with one’s own that seem inferior in comparison (2) wanting to feel superior over others who are deemed inferior. Missionary types are often the (2) kind of supremal people. They want to feel special, admired, loved, and appreciated as a superior people bringing the gift of God and civilization. Of course, being Christians for whom humility is a virtue, they won’t admit to such supremal urges and instead claim compassion for humanity. Still, they seek out the wretched of the earth because it makes them feel like demigods or angels.
Such missionary supremalism also exists among celebrities, like Bono of U2 going to Africa and standing among adoring black children. He feels like a white god bringing love and compassion to the jungle folks. Whether it’s a Christian missionary going to some poor country and playing the role of Angel Savior or some Social Justice activist or journalist globe-trotting around the world and recording all the misery, a kind of supremalism is at play. Chris Hedges loves feeling important as the Big Caring White Guy who stood with(and over) the Wretched of the Earth all over the world.

But, there is also the (1) Supremalism where people depart from their own kind to be with the superior folks who are more successful in wealth, ability, creativity, beauty, athleticism, talent, and/or glamor. Countless people have left their ‘boring’ little town for the big city(filled with very different peoples) where the action is because that’s where the talent and glamor are.
Many people want to move to the West because they see white nations as richer, white people as better in management & fairer on the Rule of Law, white people as more attractive, white people as more capable, and etc. So, we have millions upon millions of Africans and Muslims heading to Europe. And we have people all over the world flocking to the US, Australia, and Canada to be with ‘superior’ white people.

Of course, they will never admit to this to hide their shame of preferring whiteness over their own kind. No one wants to admit, “Yeah, my people suck, they are ugly, they are corrupt, they are moronic, and I feel ashamed of them, so I want to go to a land filled with capable and pretty white people.” No Mexican or Hindu will dare admit it. But he feels it deep down.

As for whites who welcome mass immigration-invasion, the (2) Supremalism is a factor because nonwhites flocking to white nations means that ‘superior’ white Liberal folks get to lord over these ‘darkies’ pleading for a better life. Diversity makes white people feel more magnanimous as the superior breed. Again, they won’t admit to harboring such feelings because PC says we’re all equal, but action speaks louder than words. If indeed all people are equal, why can’t Guatemalans or Hondurans make their own nation as good as the US? Why must they scramble to the US to live under Gringo to have a better life?

But there are also whites who want to be part of another people. Some whites see blacks as superior. They want to be with blacks, admire blacks, have sex with blacks, and have black kids. Rachel Dolezal wants to be black. And in the movie GET OUT, white people want to literally enter black bodies.

Supremalism is built into our psyche and underlies all religions. Why do we imagine God or gods? Because we want to be with the superior being. Just as dogs prefer being with humans than with their own kind in nature, we dream of eventually taking leave of our world and being accepted into the world of God or gods, be it Heaven or Valhalla.

There are too many cases of preference for the Other perceived as more just, more able, more fair, more attractive. Taiwanese are Chinese but prefer American hegemony in the Pacific because they see fellow Chinese in the mainland as ugly yellow barbarians. Taiwanese regard themselves as honorary whites.
Many Zimbabweans want white farmers back because their own black kind have ground everything into dust. Most Arabs would rather go live in Germany than deal with their own cutthroat, corrupt, and haggly-waggly kind. And some whites wax romantic about the Other as wiser or more spiritual or ‘cooler’. People tend to undervalue & take for granted what they got and overvalue & obsess about what others got.

Many nonwhites are drawn to white nations because they see whites as superior in every way. These nonwhites get little or no justice from their fellow nonwhites who are superstitious, corrupt, brutal, and clannish. So, they want to go to America(or Canada or Australia) and live under white rule. Also, they find whites to be sexually more attractive.

This may seem counterfactual because nonwhites scream about ‘white racism’ and ‘white guilt’. One might think, “If they hate whites so much, why do they want to run from their own kind and live in white nations?” It’s precisely because they prefer whites and want to live in white nations that they employ PC to lower white defenses against non-white immigration/colonization.

And in a way, whites who welcome mass-colonization from the Third World are practicing a kind of soft subconscious supremacism. They feel, “You darkies wanna leave your own inferior nations and cultures because you know that the white world and white people are better. You want to live in our superior world because you are incapable of creating anything so good in your own world.” If indeed white globalists really believe that all cultures have equal value, why do they try to push the decadent Western cult of Globo-Homo into every corner of the world? Why do whites in the West feel they are ‘more evolved’ than the cultures who don’t idolize bung-donging and tranny-penis-cutting?

Most non-white ‘immigrants’ are closet-white-supremacists. They want to run away from their own kind, own nations, and own cultures to start new lives and take on new identities under white rule. They prefer white nations(especially those created by Northern Europeans) over their own societies despite the deep roots of history and culture. The Chinese, Hindus, and Arabs have deep history, culture, and identity going back 1000s of years, but they are willing to give it all up just to have a chance to live with whites, have sex with whites, work for whites, and take on white names like ‘Heather’ and ‘Robert’.