We’ve all heard a million times that homos(and even trannies) are born that way, and nothing can be done about it. Even if we compel homos to repress their own deviant form of sexuality, it still affects the way they feel, think, and act, especially on ‘sexual’ matters but in other facets of life as well. There was a time when most people adhered to the reigning religious, medical, psychological, and/or ideological explanations on homosexuality. Religious authorities said it was sinful, very likely soul-corruption by the Devil. Medical community regarded it as some kind of a disease of the mind and glands. Certain schools of psychology deemed homosexuality the product of childhood trauma. Ideologies on the Right regarded homosexuality as a subversive undermining of society, and ideologies on the Left regarded it as the product of decadence & degeneracy as part and parcel of late-stage capitalism.

It wasn’t all that long ago when virtually all sectors of society regarded homosexuality with suspicion, hostility, and even dread. Even up to the 1980s, it wasn’t unusual for Liberal Hollywood to associate homosexuality with psychopathy and villainy, as in the Kevin Costner action movie NO WAY OUT(1987). There were also movies like WINDOWS, DRESSED TO KILL, and CRUISING that featured the dark & obsessive side of homosexuality. WINDOWS(written by Barry Siegel and directed by Gordon Willis) starred Talia Shire playing opposite a mad lesbian willing to go to any length to own her. (In the original story idea, the psycho was a tranny.) Brian De Palma’s DRESSED TO KILL featured a tranny as a serial killer. In William Friedkin’s CRUISING, the victims are homos but so is the killer(s). Even though none of these movies go out of their way to condemn homosexuality or transvestites outright, there’s a sense that individuals thus afflicted tend to be possessed of strange hang-ups or neuroses. And of course, one of the biggest movies of the 1990s, SILENCE OF THE LAMBS, had a tranny as a psycho-killer.

Given that sexual complex has often been used as the underlying motive for crazy, dangerous, or malevolent behavior in fiction — the murder in Otto Preminger’s LAURA, repressed sexual memory in Alfred Hitchcock’s MARNIE, the mad quest in THE GRADUATE, the attack on the prostitute in THE UNFORGIVEN, the bitter jealousy in RUSHMORE, the ugly tall man in MANHUNTER, and etc. — , it was only natural that storytellers would feature homosexuality or tranny-stuff as a catalyst for neurosis, frustration, or strangeness that might set off a chain reaction of horrors.
Or, if homosexuality itself was off the hook, the cause of the malaise was the repression of homosexuality, as in AMERICAN BEAUTY where the reason for the abusive husband/father’s fury & hostility turns out that he’s a closeted self-loathing homo who really wants to suck dongs.

So, if storytellers in the past often used homosexuality or tranny-ness as the hidden motive behind the anti-social, subversive, and/or dangerous behavior, later storytellers said the REAL problem derived from compelling homos and trannies to repress their true abnormal natures or ‘abnature'(as homosexuality is ‘abnatural’ as it is abnormal, i.e. it is a part of nature to the extent that most homos were born that way BUT deviates from the normal natural processes that make the survival of organisms possible). Movies like AMERICAN BEAUTY and BOYS DON’T CRY suggested that what homos need to do is come out of the closet and embrace their true nature or ‘abnature’. Then, they will be free of neurosis and will be honest with themselves and those around them, and it will be better for society as a whole since people will accept the reality of homosexuality — that some people are indeed born that way — and stop pretending that EVERYTHING and EVERYONE must be normal.

Well, we’ve seen how that theory played out. It’s hard to think of another proven so wrong, but then, those who knew of the true homo nature warned us time and time again. It should be obvious to all by now that homos(and trannies) cannot be satisfied with mere social tolerance, individual rights, and acceptance of their ‘abnature’, namely that most Americans came to realize that most homos were born that way and it’d be as difficult to turn a homo into a normo as it would be to turn a normo into a homo. I can’t imagine a real-sexual normal guy being conditioned to prefer men over women — though it may work in a few cases — , and it seems homos with their ‘abnatural’ predilections can’t help being ‘gay’ either.

Granted, one doesn’t have to be a homo to be part of ‘gay culture’, just like one doesn’t have to be Jewish to be ‘Zionist’. A Jew-as-Zionist serves his own tribal interests, whereas a goy-as-Zionist subordinates his own identity and interests in service to the apparently superior Jews. Likewise, whereas the LGBTQXYZ or Globo-Homo Cult for a homo(or tranny) is a form of self-adulation and self-celebration, it is for a straight person the elevation of ‘gay PRIDE’ as holier and nobler than anything straight, ‘lame’, and ‘square’. Just like Zionism includes Jews as the Sun and the goyim as the planets, Globo-Homo is about homos on the throne and the goyim as their standard-bearers. Both the Zionist movement and the Globo-Homo Cult are about those-who-are-served and those-who-serve. Thus, even if a straight person cannot become a homo, he can join the globo-homo cause by being pro-homo, or by adopting one of those 50 or more ‘gender-fluid’ identities that, though not explicitly homo, is ‘different’ enough to qualify one as part of the ‘queero’ community.

Now, some still argue that homosexuality must be conditioned than inborn because so many homos claim to have been molested as children. But the notion that childhood trauma can alter one’s entire sexual proclivity for the rest of one’s life sounds like a crackpot variation of Freudianism. It’s possible that, contrary to child-molestation leading to homosexuality, those with homo proclivities tend to encourage and welcome the ‘affection’ of adults. According to Milo Yiannopoulos, he was craving and begging for adult attention as a young lad. He claims to have initiated the flirtation with an older man(a priest it turns out). And according to George ‘Too Gay’ Takei, he really got a kick out of being fondled and who-knows-what-else by an adult adviser in the Boy Scouts.

So, it is likely that homo kids tend to be sexually more voracious/adventurous and invite, by means subtle and not-so-subtle, sexual advances from older people; but when they grow up, they act like they were pure-as-snow victims, as when Milo changed his story from one where he was the seducer-predator to one where he was the hapless victim. One thing for sure, even if there are a good many homos who claim to have been molested as children, there are many homos who were never molested but nevertheless turned out to be seriously ‘flaming’ toots.
Besides, science now tells us that a toot can be identified by his facial features and manner of speech. Science has shown that homos, far more than normos, tend to speak with a lisp and have girly voices. And when we look at a lot of homos, they tend to have a froopidoopiness about them.

Anyway, once science established that most homos are born that way, it became less tenable for society to persecute or condemn them for what they didn’t choose to be. They were ‘chosen’ that way by biology. That said, most of society still understood homosexuality to be strange, deviant, and even perverse, especially as it involves men who indulge in homo-fecal-penetration. Also, homosexuality is often associated with a host of behavioral patterns that tend toward the obsessive, neurotic, hedonistic, vain, and/or nihilistic.

To be sure, homosexuality comes with certain innate advantages in areas of design and craft. And some say that homosexuality is usually accompanied with few extra IQ points on average. But the CORE of homosexuality centers on a certain kind of ‘sexual’ proclivity, and objectively speaking, it cannot be good. After all, two vaginas grinding together isn’t real sex and can never produce life. As for homo men doing sodomy, that is objectively gross and medically unsafe as it involves a sex organ penetrating a fecal organ.

So, even if society came to terms with the ‘abnatural’ fact of homosexuality, it still upheld a negative and dark perspective on such behavior. After all, science now seems to indicate that pedophilia is also a ‘born’ trait, which is why it’s nearly impossible to reform and rehabilitate child molesters who feel the way they do. The closet-pedo father in Todd Solondz’s HAPPINESS risks EVERYTHING to bugger his son’s friend; despite the risk and perhaps even the realization that it’s morally wrong, he still couldn’t help himself. So, does that mean pedophilia is okay since some people are ‘born that way’? (What with the grooming of kids and pornification of childhood, society could be moving in that direction. Some might argue polygamy or its variant is the bigger threat to the social/moral order, but the difference is the pedo-community is driven and obsessive, and allied with powerful homos and trannies, in ways that the laid-back libertine poly-amorous community is not. If recent history teaches us anything, those who are incessant, obsessive, and driven tend to win out in an America where most people are now accustomed to being pushed around by nasty minorities.)

Science also indicates that some people have a natural tendency to be gluttonous or alcoholic, but people still don’t believe that pigging out or getting drunk is worthy of praise, let alone celebration, because it’s so ‘natural’ or ‘abnatural’ with some people. There was a sane and serious time when society was willing to (1) accept the fact that most homos are ‘born that way’ but (2) nevertheless regarded homosexuality as a deviance with a perverse streak. (Not only are some people born homo but such people tend to be far more risque about having multiple partners and experimenting in all manners of excess.)

But, such a compromise and consensus gradually and then dramatically faded as Jewish Power became absolutely predominant in the US(that controls all the West and most Westernized nations) and chose to use globo-homo-mania as the substitute neo-cult for Christianity and a proxy for promoting minority-elite-supremacism that would so nicely complement Jewish minority-elite-supremacism. If recent history demonstrated anything, it is that Jewish Hostility + Media & Finance Monopoly + Think Tank Domination + Power of Celebrity + Most People as Sheeple + Controlled Opposition(as US Conservatives are intimidated dogs of Jewish Power) = Social Madness. The West went from accepting the fact that homosexuality is a naturally occurring deviance to celebrating, revering, and near-worshiping homosexuality(and even tranny stuff) as what might as well be the second coming of bejesus.

How could so many people, from educated elites to unwashed masses, from people on the ‘left’ to people on the ‘right’, so quickly fall for this Jewish snake-oil? This amazing truth about humanity is at once breathtaking and dispiriting in its implications. One thing for sure, it totally destroyed the Conceit of Rationalism. It is now quite evident that even if rationalism is the ideal way, too many people are incapable of facing facts and knowing the truth. And too many people who do know the truth would rather keep silent lest they lose in the social competition for status. It now seems clear that individuals don’t decide what is good or bad based on reasoning. Rather, the decision is made at the top by the elites and then disseminated by the mass media, via which the Jewish Message enters every private space via electronic devices. We purchase and own the hardware, but most of the sounds, images, and words have been created by Jews and those mentally colonized by Jewish Power.
In other words, people end up with the Jew-in-my-brain. If all thoughts draw from a pool of availed images, sounds, data, and ideas, then those with the power to supply such matters pretty much control the thought. For instance, no matter how empirical and logical someone may wish to be, he can only think with whatever is made available to him by the controllers of information. If he’s given ONLY the Ukrainian side of the story in the current Russo-Ukraine Conflict, he can only come to the conclusion that heroic Zelensky is resisting evil Putler. Via near-total control of the academia and media, Jews have pretty much implanted every goy mind with a Jew-in-my-brain. They may believe they’re thinking for themselves, but the ‘thinking’ is really done by the Jew-in-the-brain as Jewish Power supplies the materials with which the ‘thinking’ is done. If you supply a restaurant with beef patties, buns, pickles, onions, cheese, catsup, and mustard, the chances are it’s going to make hamburgers than tacos, pizzas, gyros, or Peking duck.

Jewish Power has proven that one can fool the masses that 2 + 2 = 5. Not by demonstrating it is true mathematically but by associating the formula with fanfare, music, song & dance, and bedazzling stories of how those who believe 2 + 2 = 5 are so very cool, awesome, or ‘inspiring’. This is how Jewish Power promoted the tranny business.
Honesty and sense tell us that a man is NOT a woman simply because he insists he is, but so many have been led to believe otherwise because trannies are marketed with such affection, hype, and even reverence by the Jewish-run media. So, 2 + 2 = 5 doesn’t have to be demonstrated as true. It can be promoted as ‘true’ by emotional and sensory appeals, like a movie that makes us suspend disbelief and revel in the excitement of watching a caped hero flying over clouds.

Meanwhile, the absolute truth of 2 + 2 = 4 can be made ‘false’ in the hearts of many. How? Again, never mind its demonstrable truth and instead associate it with negativity, such as spreading the message that 4 is a ‘hate number’ or having hacks as ‘experts’ all saying in ‘unison’ that 4-as-answer has been debunked and only BAD people still believe in it.
Similarly, Conservatism Inc. will not answer pointed and valid questions about the impact of demographic transformation on the American political landscape and about the duplicitous & often hypocritical role of Jewish Power in American narrative and politics. Unwilling to deal with facts, Con Inc merely goes about smearing such manner of inquiry as ‘racism’, ‘Nazis’, or ‘Antisemitism’. If emotional/sensual appeals can fool so many people with the pseudo-science that a man can be a ‘woman’, then the same can be done to make people favor 2 + 2 = 5 over 2 + 2 = 4. It’s distressing to realize that people can be so stupid, but that’s humanity for you. If Jews did us one favor in the 21st century, it was in exposing how utterly stupid(or craven) most people can be.

Anyway, homos and their supporters have reasoned that, because homos are born-that-way and can’t do anything about it, all good and reasonable people should accept the ‘abnatural’ facts of homosexuality and stop regarding homosexuals as willfully immoral degenerates. (Granted, if the natural inclination is nevertheless deviant and prone to danger, it should be the moral obligation of those who are afflicted to curb, restrain, or at least moderate their behavior, a lesson all too neglected in the homo community that is so vain and narcissistic — common traits among homos — that it never faced up to its responsibility in the HIV epidemic that cost society dearly. That said, it seems the HIV epidemic had an effect on the homo community similar to the effect of drugs & radical violence on the Counterculture. Those most prone to abuse drugs and/or political violence either burned out or were weeded out by circumstances, leaving the more cautious, organized, and bureaucratic radicals to take power. Similarly, it seems the HIV epidemic weeded out the most brazen & adventurous ‘cowboy’ homos, thus handing the leadership of the Community to the ‘accountant’ homos.)

If homos are born-that-way and can’t help themselves and if, for that very reason, we must make peace with homos and accept the fact of how they feel and behave, then a similar demand must be made from the normo-sexual or real-sexual side. Just like it’s impossible to turn a homo sincerely into a normo by therapy or some treatment — though, to be sure, progs keep telling us ‘gender’ is a social construct and not based on biology — , it is also impossible to change a normo-sexual’s true feelings about homosexuality.
Sure, under heavy barrages of indoctrination, propaganda, and intimidation(especially with loss of job & status), normos can be browbeaten into praising and even celebrating homosexuality and tranny-ness. Especially as people are loathe to admit they conformed or consented to something out of cowardice, the cucked normos go out of their way as the ‘more evolved’ true-believers in globo-homo, just like John McCain, a pathetic dog of Zionist power, went out of his way to convince himself that he really and truly believed there is no greater honor than kissing the Zionic arse.

Still, the fact that the Power feels a need to push globo-homo 24/7 suggests an anxiety or doubt that, minus the endless conditioning and propagandizing, most normos will eventually revert to the natural tendency of regarding homos and trannies as weirdo deviants, freaks, or even degenerates worthy of derision.
We know from history that overwhelming anti-homo social pressure compelled most homos throughout the ages to either hide their sexual orientation or repress it as best they could, akin to an natural alcoholic or glutton pressured to convince himself that he doesn’t want another drink or serving of cake. Throughout history, many homo men and homo women remained in the closet and led seemingly normal lives… just like, in our time, so many normos keep their true feelings about homos hidden in the cabinet and pretend to be so hip and cool with globo-homo. It is here that the ‘rainbow’ flag has been so useful to the Agenda.

After all, people automatically visualize everything, and minus a potent deflective ‘gay’ symbol, a visual shield, as the main focus of public attention, most normos would visually associate homosexuality with images of guys sucking each other off or porking each other in the arse. Even for normos sympathetic to the homos, it wouldn’t be pleasant for them to visualize homosexuality in terms of blowjobs and sodomy among the toots.
However, if a colorful and happy symbol is associated with homos and trannies, one need not think of penis-up-the-poopchute or a doctor slicing off a penis to mold a fake ‘vagina’. Indeed, nowadays, countless people seem to think homosexuality and tranny-business are all about fanfare with happy ‘gay’ colors. Consider the advertisement for food with ‘gay’ colors. No sane normo wants to think about homo-fecal penetration or tranny penis cutting while he’s eating, but consumers purchase ‘gay’-colorized food products because they think being ‘homo’ is mainly about these bright and sassy colors.

That way, one can nibble on ‘rainbow-homosher’ or ‘gaysher'(the new kosher) oreo cookies while believing that one is celebrating happy colors than an orientation involving guys sucking dongs and doing homo-fecal-penetration on each other. People are so easily fooled. For example, why do women spend so much money on clothing and hair? Because they think a different outward presentation will make them beautiful. Consider all those big fat black women who think they will be sexy if they get nails done in some exotic way. Or how their children will be special with ‘creative’ names like Monkaynique, Skankeesha, and Bitchasshope.

Now, the Normo Argument is as follows: Just as Homos can’t help feeling their ‘abnatural’ desires because they were born-that-way, Normos can’t help feeling the way they do about homosexuality and tranny-stuff because they were born-that-way. Normos have a natural aversion, revulsion, distaste, disgust, and attitude-of-ridicule about homosexuality and tranny-stuff. Just as it was cruel to force homos to reject their true homo nature and feign normo-sexuality out of fear of social rejection or worse, it is cruel, repressive, and corrupting to force normos to pretend that they are totally cool with a pseudo-sexuality involving homo-fecal-penetration and tranny-penis-cutting by Frankenstein Medical practice.

What is most cruel, ugly, and vile is the defamation that natural normo-sexual feelings about homosexuality and tranny-stuff are ‘homophobic’ and ‘transphobic’. No, phobia is a medical term that means panicked reaction and extreme fear/dread of something harmless and safe. Normo-sexuals are naturally and rationally turned off by homosexuality that is sexually useless and physically gross. There is nothing phobic about such a reaction. Just as people are grossed out by people eating feces, normo-sexuals find it gross that some men would have ‘sex’ by inserting their penises into poopholes of other men. And when normo-sexuals ponder what actually happens during a ‘sex reassignment’ surgery, of course they would be freaked out.

Why wouldn’t they be when it involves mutilation of a perfectly healthy organ to make for an ugly-looking fake ‘vagina’, especially one that smells like poop? If there is any phobia in our culture, it is Normo-Phobia that has inverted all the sane, natural, and rational modes of humanity. We are to believe that men buggering one another or cutting off genitals is about PRIDE.

In contrast, normo-sexuals or real-sexuals who find homosexuality or tranny-business to be deviant and perverse are said to suffer from a ‘phobia’. It’d be like saying “Drinking urine is worthy of pride BUT those who express disgust over it are showing signs of phobia, or pissdrinkophobia.” (By the way, if progs really believe that people with anti-homosexual feelings are ‘homophobic’ or suffer from a medical condition, they should show sympathy for them because people who suffer from phobias can’t help themselves. If indeed ‘homophobia’ is a real phobia, then the afflicted are as helpless as those with arachnophobia, acrophobia, or ophidiophobia, extreme fear of all snakes, even harmless ones. But even as progs accuse anti-‘gay’ people of being inflicted with a ‘phobia’, they BLAME them of moral failings. But if people who oppose the ‘gay’ agenda are truly sick in the head, they should not be blamed for what would be a clinical malady.)

The fact is real-sexuals normally feel a natural revulsion toward homosexuality and find stuff like tranny-business to be ridiculous. Just like homo men can’t help wanting to suck each other’s dong and bugger each other’s bung, real-sexuals cannot help feeling queasy about what homos and trannies do. This is NOT a phobia of any kind. Nearly ALL normo-sexuals or real-sexuals don’t have panic attacks or freak out over someone being homo. Instead, what they feel is a naturally derisive sense that the homo guy is either too effete/pansy as a man or that he indulges in gross pseudo-sexual acts.

Normality naturally favors the conventional, the standard, the usual. Now, there are exceptions. Beauty is rare, and normal people who are average in looks prize beauty like precious gold. Elite athletic ability and high intelligence are also rare, and normal people admire the naturally gifted who happen to be far stronger or smarter than the average. (It could be, precisely because most people aren’t exceptional in intelligence, looks, or athleticism, they now seek to be special in ways that are far more accessible, such as tattoos, piercings, and green-colored hair. If you can’t be outstanding, be stand-outish.)

Even so, normality generally prefers what is common and familiar, and this accounts for certain negative attitudes even toward those with prized traits. For example, the overly big and strong person has often been caricatured as a ‘moose’, more beast than man. And beautiful women have often been associated with vanity, vapidity, narcissism, self-absorption, or all-looks-and-no-brains, aka ‘bimbos’. Most people aren’t rich and want more money, but there is also the negative caricature of uber-rich people as snobby, stuck-up, crass, greedy, and soulless. And even as we admire intelligence, there’s no dearth of the negative stereotype of the ‘aspergy’ geek or nerd who is all brains and a bundle of neurosis. Though ‘fag’ is now a dirty word, ‘geek’ and ‘nerd’ are not. Justified or not, the normal feels a certain disdain even for people with rare gifts, abilities, or good fortunes that most people would like to have. There is a sense that, in having those ‘extreme’ qualities, the ‘special’ people tend to be walking-talking caricatures than well-rounded people. Consider the cult of the artist with both positive and negative connotations. There is the romantic notion that, being different and special, the artist has devoted his entire life(and even sanity and health) toward creating masterpieces for the ages. But there is also the perception of self-indulgence, madness, and sickly obsession to attain, via a Faustian pact, the creative secret of the gods.

Now, if normal people entertain negative feelings about positive and much-prized traits, just imagine what they naturally feel for extreme manifestations of negative, useless, and/or harmless traits. If even great beauty or intelligence can be objects of mockery, imagine how most people feel about extreme ugliness or extreme retardation.
Out of kindness, most normal people, being decent ladies and gents, will not go out of their way to mock ugly or dumb people. Most people take pity on the deformed character of ELEPHANT MAN and harbor no ill feelings toward the mentally retarded. But most normal people don’t want to be around hideously ugly people and seriously low-IQ people. Likewise, for most normal people, homosexuality and tranny-stuff seem like extremes of negativity. Not all men are masculine, but certain froopy-doop types are off-the-charts in pansiness. And trannies who are men-pretending-to-be-women just look ridiculous.

And the idea of a fake ‘vagina’ is gross to most people, which is why even PC-addled proggy men who say all the token ‘woke’ things will NOT date or have ‘sex’ with trannies. They can tell themselves that a ‘woman’ can have a penis or that an artificially created ‘vagina'(via Frankenstein medical surgery) is just as good as a real vagina, but something essential to their nature says “NO, that is freaky as hell!” Just like people feel a natural aversion to gluttonous fatties and lazy unkempt types wallowing in filth, people naturally disdain homosexuality and tranny-stuff that come across as extremes in negativity.

It’s one thing for men to have some effete traits, but some homos really take the cake. It’s one thing for men to dress a bit pretty and look elegant, but trannies in dress and high-heels look retarded? In the presence of such types, most normal people feel revulsion or ridicule(that may turn into laughter).
And such response among normo-sexuals is natural, no less than it is ‘abnatural’ for a homo to want to suck dongs and take them up his anus. If the natural feelings of homos are so overwhelming that it’s near-impossible for them to refrain from blatantly odd(and even harmful) behavior such as ‘cock-sucking’ and homo-fecal-penetration(and even fisting in some cases), then we shouldn’t demand that normo-sexuals refrain from natural feelings of revulsion and disdain about homosexuals and trannies. If it’s unhealthy for homos to repress their true nature and keep it all bottled up, it’s equally unhealthy for normo-sexuals to deny their true nature and self-censor honest responses to what they deem to be odd, strange, and deviant.

Now, a compromise is possible whereby homosexuals do their own thing in their own space while normo-sexuals express their naturally negative feelings about homosexuality in their own space. There is no need for normo-sexuals to insult homosexuals as ‘fags’ and the like, but there is also no need for homos and trannies to demand that normo-sexuals honor, praise, celebrate, and even revere the attitudes and behaviors of homos and trannies as quasi-spiritual and ‘rainbow’-like.

But, under the current Jewish Supremacist rule over the West, any compromise is unthinkable. Jewish Sodosemites think, “We demand, they obey” and urge upon the homos and trannies to push their agenda. The diva-like homo/tranny character, being naturally vain and narcissistic, wants far more than tolerance and mutual recognition. Rather, homos want to hog the stage of culture, politics, and even spirituality and present themselves as something akin to a quasi-race-of-angels. They’re far beyond gratitude for their own spaces to do their homo things. They want to take over all public spaces, schools, banks, businesses, governments, and even churches to spread what could only be called Homomania or Queertianity.

Of course, homos(and especially trannies) on their own couldn’t have accumulated such power in a million years. But having the backing of Jewish Supremacists, the most powerful people in the world with control of finance, media, and much else, homos pulled off an idolatrous neo-satanic takeover of Western culture, politics, and even spirituality(as so many churches fly the homo flag, as if indeed Jesus died so that His followers could celebrate sodomy and tranny-penis-cutting).

As a result, even though we are told that it’s cruel, unjust, and dishonest to force homos to repress their true nature, we are told that real-sexuals must repress their own normal and natural feelings about homos and trannies as ‘unnatural’, ‘irrational’, and downright ‘phobic’. So, while homos are so irrepressibly homo that they can’t help being ‘gay’, we are to believe that normos harboring anti-homo feelings are acting AGAINST their own ‘normal’ nature.

In other words, the current idolatry says it’s natural and (new)normal for normos to have the most positive feelings about homos and trannies. To shore up their specious line of ‘reasoning’, ‘woke’ commissars point to the current West and remark how so many normos now celebrate homosexuality, but that is to totally ignore the fact that (1) most of the world media are controlled by venal Jewish Supremacists and Sodo-Semites who are the real architects of Globo-Homo (2) people, young and old, have been inundated with endless streams of homo propaganda via education, entertainment, and advertising, and (3) Jews and their cuck-commissars have created means of purges and lawfare whereby anyone deviating from the current dogma and ‘idology'(or idolatry as ideology) is swiftly character-assassinated and ‘canceled’.

Therefore, even though so many people seem happy-crazy about ‘gay’ stuff, it’s really part of a ceaseless campaign of artificially manufactured hype, euphoria, and fear-mongering. History has shown that such madness isn’t difficult to achieve IF the power is sufficiently concentrated. Consider the mass mania of Germany that blindly worshiped Adolf Hitler that drove them to ruin. Or consider the madness of Maoism that once engulfed the entire nation.
Looking back, we may one day wonder, how could so many seemingly normal people have been so duped and swayed into such feverish stupidity? We like to pride ourselves for living in a democracy with freedom and rational thinking, but most hearts and minds are shaped by slogans, mantras, idolatry, and dogmas pushed by institutions and industries where power is concentrated.

Now, some homos may object to the notion that homosexuality amounts to a negative extreme like obesity. Homos could argue that while there is nothing good to be said about obesity, there is much to be credited to homosexuality. For example, even though Orson Welles, Jean Renoir, and Sergio Leone were great film-directors, their success probably owed nothing to their considerable girths. There have been many successful fatsos, but it’d be quite a stretch to attribute their talents to their appetites. (Or maybe it can. Perhaps, Welles’ voracious appetite was part of his world-conquering personality.)
In contrast, the same cannot be said of the toots. While the average homo is hardly special in talent, there have been too many remarkable homos in the arts, design, fashion, music, and letters to dismiss the possibility of a link between homosexuality and certain kinds of creativity. And therein lies the difference between obesity and homosexuality. While some people have much bigger natural appetites than most people do — just like homos have a natural leaning to be fruity — the achievements of successful fatsos probably have nothing to do with their massive craving for More Food.

Thus, the worth(or lack thereof) of obesity can be measured by its most obvious external manifestation. A fatso is fat, and that isn’t good, and he should lose some weight. In contrast, there is MORE to homosexuality than its obviously grotesque manifestation in the ‘sexual’ arena that involves fecal penetration and a generally nihilistic plunge into depravity. If such were the ONLY features of homosexuality, we could dismiss it as a mere sexual deviance that leads to perverted behavior. But apparently, homosexuality has connections with certain brain functions and allows for nimbler use of fingertips. And this has led to homos making considerable contributions to the arts, letters, and design.

Also, as homos are not burdened by family — even with ‘gay marriage’ as law of the land, most homos don’t have children — , they can work 24/7, something impossible for men and women seeking to balance work and family. That means homos have created lots of things of great appeal to countless straight people and have been especially committed to tirelessly working as advisers and managers. And that means they’ve accumulated a great deal of cultural capital, social capital, connections with powerful people, and insider knowledge.
Thus, there is more to being a tooty than being a fatty. While, outwardly speaking, homosexuality does seem gross to many/most normo-sexuals, there is no denying that there are facets and permutations of being ‘gay’ that have led to considerable and even crucial contributions to civilization and power.

In that light, we can understand homo frustrations through the ages. They, as closeted fruits, made many contributions to society but hardly got the credit. So many normo-sexuals with disdain and hostility toward homosexuals were actually enjoying and/or benefiting from the fruits of fruitcakes.
Furthermore, most normos felt they were benefiting from the achievements of straight people since most homos remained in the closet and pretended to be straight. Homos felt like Cyrano de Bergerac. They made the poetry but someone else got the credit. (Some even say ‘Shakespeare’ was a mere front for a genius homo playwright.) Therefore, unless homos came out of the closet and declared their talents, they would never get the credit and respect that they really deserved.

And yet, paradoxically enough, in our age when Homos have not only come out of the closet but out of the bedroom into the streets with their ‘gay pride’ banners, their creativity has mostly turned to trash. Perhaps, the formula for homo success wasn’t simply innate homo talent but the social repression of homosexuality. In other words, too much of a good thing is a bad thing. Consider what black self-indulgence did to black musical culture, which is now mostly rap crap.

Under previous cultural climates, homos felt a need to mold and channel their natural narcissism and vanity in the service of something broader and deeper than “I’m so gay and fancy-poo.” After all, what makes a great actress isn’t simply beauty and/or acting chops but the willingness to subsume her own considerable ego into an empathetic portrayal of another character. Thus, even as she is indeed feeding her own ego as a star(or star-wanna-be), she is also restraining and molding her own ego in service to a portrait of another person.

After all, nothing would be more boring and insufferable than an actress whose entire shtick is “Look at me, I’m pretty, I can show off all kinds of emotions.” Julianne Moore was just awful in MAGNOLIA with a look-at-me performance. When homos were closeted, it was unfair that they didn’t get the credit they deserved, but their creativity was enriched, deepened, and even ennobled by serving something greater than a narrow bandwidth of ego or group identity.
In our time, however, homos seem to do little but fill TV shows & movies with endless(and often irrelevant or gratuitous) homo propaganda; or much of the energy seemed devoted to making yet more advertisements about how we should consume Oreo cookies and guzzle Sprite soda because they are so ‘woke’ with globo-homo exuberance. So, when homos can be openly creative, they are actually less creative, or at least less meaningfully creative.

Anyway, one thing is for sure. Even if there is more to homosexuality than sodomy and poon-grinding, its most defining feature and characteristic are not good and cannot be good. There is absolutely nothing good about homo-fecal-penetration, which is gross, disease-prone, and disgusting. As for poon grinding, while not physically gross from a hygienic angle, it makes zero sexual sense.

To the extent that most normo-sexuals aren’t interested in the arts & culture(in which closeted homos played a key role in the past) and have a more basic and elemental understanding of humanity, they have every reason to be psychologically and physically put off by homosexuality.
If you ask any guy, “How would you like to have someone stick his dick up your ass?”, his natural, normal, and healthy response is going to be, “What the fuc* are you, some kind of a faggot?”

Indeed, what do normo-sexual men fear most about ending up in jail? There’s a good chance that their bungs will be torn apart by Negro dongs. Of course, if Milo ends up behind bars, he will probably have the time of his life. Now, is it ‘homophobic’ for normo-sexual men to be so put off by thoughts of homo behavior? Of course not. It’s a healthy, natural, normal, and rational reaction(and defensive mechanism) to something that is so obviously gross and grotesque.

Humans are naturally empathetic — the ability to put oneself in another’s shoes — , and when normo-sexual men try to imagine themselves as toots being rammed in the ass or ramming their dongs inside the poop-chutes of other men, their immediate natural reaction is Ewwwwww and for good reason. So, let homos be ‘gay’ since they were born-that-way, and let normos be ‘nay’ in their naturally visceral dislike of homosexuality.

There used to be such an understanding/compromise, but today, homos and trannies are encouraged to strut their stuff in the streets and even in the presence of young school-children, whereas even the faintest negativity expressed by normo-sexuals on the matter of homosexuality leads to rabid hysteria, witch-hunts, and mania to tar-and-feather the heretic who then must be burned at the stake for all to see to send the message loud-and-clear that we must all worship globo-homo as the proxy of Jewish Supremacist Power.