It all comes down to man-mentality or dog-mentality. When a man believes something is right and wants it, he feels it in his bones. He grabs for it, and it’s not a matter of what others think. He prioritizes what HE feels to be right and righteous. He has autonomy, agency, and independence.
In contrast, no matter how much a dog wants something, its appetite takes a backseat to its anxiety for the master’s approval. This slavish craving for approval stands between the dog and what it really wants. No matter how much a dog wants something, it first looks for the go-ahead from the master.

This is why Charles Murray is ultimately worthless. He has a dog mentality. He may want good things for white folks in a country defined by liberty and civic nationalism, but when push comes to shove, this Biden-voting lowlife scumbag’s innermost emotion is abject servility to the Jewish Master. (Despising and not voting for Trump is one thing, but how can anyone who cares about America vote for Joe Biden? Only a craven and wussy status-anxious piece of turd on the conservative or libertarian side of the aisle could have done such a thing.)

Because of Murray’s dog-mentality, even what he yearns for — decent treatment of white folks like himself — must take a backseat to sappy servility to Jews and an eagerness for their approval. Indeed, even when he lays out the argument for innate racial differences, it boils down to, “I’m doing this really for YOU, my Jewish Master. It is to prevent the rise of white consciousness lest it challenge your deserved Chosen-People supremacy over us inferior goyim.”
It’s been his usual shtick despite being lambasted and skewered by the Jewish-run media since the publication of THE BELL CURVE, the pressures of which have even led Conservatism Inc. to ignore him — The Nat or Gnat Review, even more nervous about Jewish sensitivities than Chuck the Cuck himself, didn’t even bother to review Murray’s latest book, silently acquiescing to the ‘canceling’ of the dufus. What a sad case, this Murray. Such dogs are utterly useless to the white race. A true patriot must be pro-white because he feels it in his bones, because it is his innermost passion and duty. All his thoughts and actions must flow from a virile racial consciousness. Anxiety about Jewish Approval must not stand between himself and his sense of destiny.

When a free man hunts rabbit, he does so because he wants to. He doesn’t look over his shoulder for approval. In contrast, even when a dog is most eager to chase after rabbits, it first looks to the master for approval. If the master signals NO, the dog suppresses its desire because its primary function is to seek the master’s approval and its corollary, an abject fear of his disapproval. Murray is just a white dog, a pathetic hound.

He practices a form of servile race-ism, a kind of racialist view devised not to serve and favor one’s own group but another. If ‘racism’ is commonly understood as a sense of racial superiority or chauvinism over other groups, Murray’s brand of cuck-racism comes down to spinning racial facts and theories in service to what he deems to be the superior race, the Jews.
Of course, Murray will deny this, but whom is he kidding? If judged on the basis of his political biases, he is clearly a supremacist except not for his own kind but for the Jews, which is indeed why he makes Jews nervous even though he’s doing it for them. The autistic side of Murray hopes that if the world knows Jews are smarter, most goyim will be like Murray: get down on their knees and worship/serve Jews as the Master Race. Jews know better. Sure, while some goyim will cuck to Jews as innately superior, others may grow resentful and suspicious, or come to the realization that intelligence and wisdom aren’t synonymous — too many high-IQ Jews act more like tribal gangsters and their supposed ‘liberalism’ is really a veil to hide their true motives.

Murray seems to believe he’s doing a favor for the blue city elites by speaking rather frankly on the black issue: Blacks do worse in school due to lower intelligence and commit more crime due to… something! In the corridors of his cuck-brain, these plain truths can only favor the affluent Jews and white elites. After all, if indeed blacks are more violent, then tougher policing and measures like stop-and-frisk, along with expanded incarceration, are most justified. Also, if black failure owes to lower IQ, then white ‘liberals’ have less to feel guilty about and can take greater pride in their own success(than torment themselves as undeserving beneficiaries of ‘white privilege’). Heather MacDonald, dufus #2, seems to share Murray’s view as she’s always arguing for more meritocracy and law-and-order in support of blue city ‘liberal’ elites. “I’m trying to defend your wealth & success and protect you people from black crime.”

But what both fail or refuse to understand is that it’s not just about success & failure and facts & data. Of course, Jews, at least the smart ones, know all about racial differences and the black problem. How could they not when Jews, more than most other ethnic groups, had a long history of dealing with blacks?
But, Jews know blacks are talented in key areas, and furthermore, the real backbone of Jewish Power is white submission. The cult of ‘white guilt’ must be sustained at all times(along with Holocaust Guilt) in order to prevent the emergence of white identity and interest, pride and agency.
So, it’s advantageous for Jewish Supremacism to push the narrative that black problems are entirely the fault of whites who must atone at all times by rejecting any sense of white positivity, even the notion of “It’s Okay to be White.”

As for white gulliberals drunk on the Kool-Aid, Negrolatry is their post-Christian religion of choice, along with Anne Frank Worship and Homomania. These people vape so much on the self-serving ‘virtue’ in regards to the Magic-Tragic Negro that they simply can’t let it go, even if it harms them socially and/or economically. Their sense of ‘spiritual’ conviction derives from the notion that they, as conscientious and guilt-ridden whites, are committed to the elevation of the Noble Negro, whereas all those ‘racist’ redneck MAGA deplorables want to bring back black slavery, call blacks ‘ni**ers’ 1000x a day, and whip blacks until dey all be saying dey’s name be ‘Toby’.

In other words, you can’t argue facts and logic with a cult-or-religious mentality, and it just so happens that ‘secular liberals’ have their own faiths and dogmas. So, even though stuff like BLM has resulted in considerable harm to blue cities, the gullib material well-being takes a backseat to the proggish ‘spiritual’ vanity that wants to wash George Floyd’s feet(and suck his dong). They are like the whites in GET OUT, or getoutsiders, who fetishize blackness to the point of devouring both whiteness and blackness.

Now, it doesn’t take too much imagination to figure this out, but Murray pores over the facts under the delusion of one day being appreciated by Jews and white gulliberals. He uses a magnifying glass when he needs to step back and see the bigger picture of the power dynamics. True, policies like Stop-and-Frisk have been beneficial to Jews in big cities, and urban gentrification did wonders for the affluent white gulliberal crowd.
But what is of paramount importance to Jews is white submission to Jewish Supremacism, and so, safer streets had to be shelved to quash the rise of implicitly white populist-nationalism. Jews used the BLM card and 1619 narrative(and other bogus nonsense) to impugn whiteness at every turn, and white gulliberals, who’d enjoyed extended good times with gentrification, increased policing, and elevated incarceration rates for blacks, went all in on a new round of Negrolatry to exonerate themselves while dumping all the race problems on Trump and MAGA(and white cops who’d done so much to make blue cities nicer and comfier for Jews and white gullibs).

Jewish Supremacists need their secrets, and white gullibs need their delusions, and that is why Murray’s simple facts are so ‘triggering’ to them. To Jews, it’s a threat to their key to power, which is using blacks to guilt-bait whites into contrition and obeisance; and to white gullibs, it threatens their favored myth and the reason for sanctimony, the kind that oozes from the dorky face of icky CucKen Burns.
It’s about the power of power(for Jews) and the power of delusion(for gullibs), not so different from the Church’s denunciation of Galileo’s astronomical discoveries. Even the educated clergy who privately thought Galileo may be correct were nevertheless fearful of its impact on Church authority, and the true-believers of course wanted to burn him at the stake.
MaGoo Murray seems to take the modern Jews and urban white gulliberals at their word, i.e. they are secular, rational, and committed to free discussion and open to all views. In truth, Jews worship themselves and care most about power, and gullibs are no less irrational than religious folks, the difference being they have their own secular cults, icons, and sacraments(mostly controlled by Jews). It’s incredible that Murray hasn’t figured this out.

For all his high intelligence and erudition, Murray is either weak or bloody shoopid. Smart is the opposite of dumb but not of stupid, as some of the smartest people are also stupid as hell. Murray’s innate weakness of character betrayed itself when he caved on ‘gay marriage’, and on what basis? He didn’t want to hurt the sensitivities of ‘gay spouses’ playing at parenting. There you go, the institution most crucial to the well-being of civilization dismissed by Murray over the social anxiety of offending the ‘right kind of people’, the urbane, credentialed, and affluent. How weak can you get? That is so gay.

In one of his books he despaired of the ‘coming apart’ of American Society along socio-geographical and class lines, but the likes of him only need look in the mirror as they’re part of the problem. All said and done, instead of sticking with principles regardless of social station, thereby maintaining the bond among the high, middle, and low, he caved to remain in good graces with the ‘better kind of people’, the very same thing he did when he voted for Biden who’s flooding the US with tons of illegals and promoting all kind of degeneracy from the White House itself.
According the Murray the Cuck, the homo couple(who changed his position on ‘gay marriage’) were such darling people oh-so devoted to ‘their’ children, but that BS isn’t good enough. The very foundation of their union is bogus and an affront to biology and morality. It’s like it doesn’t matter if I do good deeds with stolen money. The fact that the money was stolen delegitimizes whatever good I do. But then, I suspect Murray’s cucking to ‘gay marriage’ had as much to do with the fact that the Jews, his god-masters, decreed in so many words that ‘gay marriage’ is THE LAW and that’s that, so shut up. Dog must obey the master.

Now, anyone in the professional world has to make some compromises, and no one could expect someone like Murray with a foothold in mainstream publishing to always speak freely and stick to principles. But, when someone goes 180 degrees on a fundamental value he’d espoused all his life and over some BS excuse, that is either weak or shallow. Patrick Buchanan compromised a lot too, but we know he would never compromise on bung-dong marriage. He always had a core set of principles that he remained true to. Such cannot be said of Murray the chicken-cuck-weasel.

Murray’s cowardly even when he’s courageous, which makes him sort of schizo. This is no less true of his latest book FACING REALITY. By conventional standards, Murray tackled topics in a way that most scholars and public intellectuals would not dare. But instead of marching all the way with courage, he gets cold feet and mutes himself on certain matters.
He dares to mention all the facts of black criminality and etc. but refuses to discuss WHY blacks are this way. So, it’s a case of facing reality(that blacks commit a lot of crime and have problems in school) but not delving into that reality, which is actually quite simple. Blacks evolved in hot, wild, and crazy Africa with elephants, lions, hyenas, leopards, cape buffaloes, crocodiles, hippos, rhinos, giraffes, chimps, gorillas, baboons, cobras, warthogs, honey badgers, and etc., all of which drove blacks crazy while being driven crazy themselves by blacks with their spears and bongos. It was an endless cycle of blacks chucking spears at wild beasts that, in turn, wanted to gore them, stomp them, or tear them to pieces. Under such circumstances, is it so surprising that blacks ended up like Tommy the Hitman Hearns, Iron Mike Tyson, and all those ghastly Negroes in the NFL?

Indeed, it’s not just the blacks. Among species that inhabit several continents, it’s usually the ones in Africa that are the craziest and most aggressive. The African elephant is bigger and more aggressive than the Asian kind. The African rhino is more aggressive than the Asian rhino. The zebra is more hyper and unruly than the wild pony outside Africa. African animals grew meaner and nastier not only because blacks drove them crazy but because they drove each other crazy. Imagine you’re a zebra and have to contend with lions, leopards, hyenas, hunting dogs, and crocodiles(every time you’re thirsty). A deer in North America had only to worry about cougars and wolves, but prey animals in Africa were surrounded or stalked by the meanest predators in the world, minus the tiger.
But such rough truth seems to be beneath Murray’s sense of dignity. But, truth is VULGAR because all living things are animals that eat, kill, and shit. Table manners are necessary for civilization, but let’s not fool ourselves about how food is procured, which is by mass bloodbath of domesticated beasts and the fish in the sea. Just like certain shock jocks on the radio spoke more truth than the so-called respectable voices, what we need is the shock scholar, or shockalor.

https://ricochet.com/podcast/powerline/a-conversation-with-charles-murray-and-steve-sailer-pt-1/
https://ricochet.com/podcast/powerline/a-conversation-with-charles-murray-and-steve-sailer-pt-2/

In the interview with cuck-maggot Steven Hayward, Charles Murray refers to some unnamed figure as a ‘white supremacist’, the kind he would rather not associate with. Now, if he means someone like Tom Metzger or Norman Lincoln Rockwell, okay. But, I suspect he means Jared Taylor or Kevin MacDonald. Or maybe David Duke, though he’s such a pariah that why would Murray even bother to acknowledge his voice? (As for the interviewer Steven Hayward, he’s a useless cuck-tard, the kind who considers Matthew Yglesias as some kind of ‘liberal’ that the Right can fruitfully engage with. This Yglesias wants to flood the US with a billion nonwhites, but he’s apparently a rational figure in the imagination of cuckservatism rooted in an inferiority complex and longing for validation from the supposedly intellectually superior and respectable ‘liberal’ community. Steve Sailer, who should know better, is so starstruck with Charles Murray, as Charlie Brown is with that perennial loser Joe Shlatbotnik, that he just plays along with the silly charade moderated by a dork.)

Supposing Murray was referring to Jared Taylor or Kevin MacDonald, with David Duke a distant third possibility, let’s consider each case. While Taylor is certainly more strident in his views on blacks(and nonwhite immigrants, aka Diversity), his only ambition is for the defense of traditionally Western homelands. How that makes him a ‘white supremacist’ is beyond me. If anything, his weakness is shared by Murray, and it is the most supremacist element of Taylor’s worldview. Like Murray, Taylor seems to regard Jews as the natural master race, whose vision and guidance that the weaker-willed and weaker-personalitied white race cannot do without.

So, the ONE PEOPLE Taylor will never denounce are the Jews in the delusional hope that the great majority of the Tribe will one day finally see the light and come to the side of whites. It’s the secular HBD version of the Christian dream of the Conversion of the Jews. This near-veneration of Jews is a kind of supremacism, or at least ‘subremacism’ where whites subordinate themselves to the supremacism of the Jews as the natural Master Race. Murray, no less than Taylor, subscribes to such a view even though he won’t admit it. Both men must know that Jewish Power, more than any other, has been most instrumental in the rapid demise of Western Civilization in the modern era, but they refuse to name the name.

As for Kevin MacDonald, he has committed himself to naming the Jewish Power and exploring/exposing the myriad ways by which Jewish Power manipulates goyim in the service of “Is it good for the Jews?” His supposed ‘antisemitism’ is actually anti-supremacist because he’s calling out on Jewish Supremacism and its dire impact on the world, mostly on whites but others as well, such as the Palestinians.

The Great Replacement by region pic.twitter.com/OaNwMuKv6j

—