Much of what people understand as History has less to do with facts than the factor of who controls the discourse. So, even if it’s proven beyond a doubt that the six million figure for the Holocaust is false, the myth continues so long as the Power insists it must. The Power controls the knob and can amplify or mute whatever it wants — consider how George Floyd, who most likely died of overdose, has been canonized while Derek Chauvin rots in prison for 20 long years for merely having done his job of protecting blue city yuppie elites from black thugs. Most people don’t(and can’t) do independent research and, as normies, usually go with the flow.
Now, there are surely historians and the like who know the six million figure is a gross exaggeration, but they fear being ostracized and/or blacklisted. Being labeled a ‘denier’ is tantamount to heresy in our so-called secular order with new gods, namely the Tri-Idolatry or Tridolatry of Jews, Negroes, and Homos. The Power will denounce you, and the normies will see you as a ‘neo-nazi’, ‘white supremacist’, ‘anti-semite’, or some nutjob crank because they almost never look or think beyond the standard narratives of public education and the Jewish-run ‘mainstream media’, not least because hedonism keeps most Americans occupied with sTuPiD sHiT.

No wonder then even honest people have problems with seeking and telling the truth. They are caught between the Power and the People. The Power is addicted to control and weaves any narrative, pushes any lie, and suppresses any truth to maintain its grip.
The People, most of whom are ‘normies’, are easily manipulated by the Power. In certain respects, they are more effectively manipulated in so-called ‘liberal democracies’ where people are made to feel free and empowered. In actuality, people in so-called ‘democracies’ vote for whore-pawns vetted and bought/sold by the oligarchs who also own nearly all the media that hire flunkies, careerists, propagandists, and activists(in line with oligarchic agendas). People living under communism had fewer illusions about the propagandistic nature of their system.

Undoubtedly, the so-called ‘liberal’ West was many times freer than Stalinist Russia and Maoist China, but the danger lay in the fallacy that what’s better must be best, indeed the best of all possible worlds. If Bob the regular gangster is a better person than Tom the psycho-gangster, it still doesn’t mean Bob is a good person. Though not as terrible as Tom, he too is a criminal, a thug, and even a killer.
The so-called ‘Liberal West’ was undoubtedly freer than communist systems(or other hardline forms of autocracy) and more kinds of speech were allowed, but that hardly means it was the bastion of truth.
But, the cult of ‘muh democracy’ and ‘muh free speech’ fooled a lot of people that they could reliably trust the media(because it’s part of the ‘free press’) in a society committed to free inquiry, free speech, and freedom of conscience. Like the hare that took for granted its lead over the tortoise, people in the West have been complacent in the assumption that they are living in the best of all possible worlds, the one that won the End of History. This has resulted in ‘insouciance’, as Paul Craig Roberts usually gripes, which has led to an unceasing erosion of liberties and rights without people even caring to notice. Even as people in the West keep losing more liberties and rights, they habitually reassure themselves, “I’m living in a liberal democracy, therefore I’m free… unlike those living in autocratic Russia or China.” But there is worse. While some freedom lovers have been ‘insouciant’, many of the millennials and zoomers raised on ‘woke’ idolatry-ideology, or idology, believe liberties and rights must be curtailed in defense of the sacred, namely the Tridolatry of Jews, Negroes, and Homos. If freedom lovers slack off, the control-freaks foam at the mouth.

The West was always under some form of oligarchic power, but it’s getting worse under Jewish Power that refuses to even acknowledge its dominant position(fueled by a tribal sense of supremacism & contempt), lacks any sense of magnanimity, is intoxicated with moral narcissism, and is caught in the web of its own paranoia.
In the West, never has so much power been concentrated in the hands of so few who, to make things worse, happen to be virulently hostile toward and derisive of the people they rule over. Why else would they push for the Great Replacement or White Nakba? It’s because Jews don’t regard white folks as their own people but as the Goy Other that must be kept in their place; and what more effective and permanent way to destroy white power than by demographically eclipsing whites with non-white goyim. Oy vey from Jews, Obey for whites. The current West is something like an ‘oligomocracy’, i.e. it’s totally controlled by the oligarchy but within the framework of what appears to be a democracy.

Honest people find themselves caught between the Power that prioritizes control and the People who gobble up the slop they’re fed. It’s the Glob and the Mob. Consider how the Twitter Mob works. Those ‘woke’ idiots gulp up guppy-like all the crap fed to them by the Jewish-controlled media and academia. They think they are more ‘sophisticated’, ‘evolved’, and ‘hip’ because they get their ideas and views from supposed ‘progressives’ with elevated elite credentials.
Not that American ‘conservatives’ are much better as they’ve long swallowed whatever came on Talk Radio controlled by Neocon monopolists. (And even alternative voices like Alex Jones would have us believe Arabs own Hollywood and China has something to do with Globo-Homo.)
The proggies feel smarter because they hang around the tonier parts of the city, attended fancier colleges, watch Young Turks, listen to NPR, and maybe have a subscription to the New Yorker. One can of course get valuable news and information from such sources — they sure beat the 700 Club and much of Talk Radio — , but all said and done, they hardly dare to look beyond the Overton Window installed by Jewish Power. Indeed, the sudden war on Free Speech by so-called ‘progressives’ has been instigated from above by Jewish supremacist opinion-makers. For many(though not all) Jews, free speech was never a principle but a tactic, something to champion to gain power and something to clamp down once they got the power.

Jewish Power isn’t for free-ranging intelligence in search of the truth but for corralled and tamed ‘intelligentry’ in service to Jewish Power and the gods it controls. Jews fear true secularism where people use reason and facts in pursuit of a worldview that comports with reality. Such a secularism favors no side as plenty of dirt can be found on any group. It could dig up lots of dirt on Anglos, Germanics, and Slavs but also plenty on Jews, blacks, homos, and etc.
Mao Zedong soon realized the threat to his system from the principles of the Hundred Flowers Campaign. For a season or two, something like a real liberal spirit prevailed in China as people were allowed and even encouraged to say anything, even against the party. Few initial drips turned into a torrent that then threatened to break the dam of party authority.
Likewise, the liberal socialist experiments in Czechoslovakia in the mid-1960s led to the Prague Spring that challenged the very authority of the Communist Party. (What the West needs is a White Spring.) Soviet tanks rolled in to restore communist control and dogma. Mikhail Gorbachev had his own Hundred Flowers Campaign called Glasnost and, unlike Mao who soon reversed course, he allowed it to take root and grow. The result was a million complaints from the people and the utter demoralization of party members. It wasn’t long before the whole edifice of Soviet authority crumbled. (Of course, by then, all of Eastern Europe had given up on communism and looked to the West for aid, guidance, and investment.) Within that context, what Jewish Power is doing is smart if its ultimate objective is Power > Principle. True free speech + uncensored internet can only lead to the exposure and diminishment of Jewish Power.

In order for communism or at least communist party authority to remain, the Marxist-Leninist brand of secularism had to enforce its sacraments and taboos. While lots of things could be questioned, certain things could not be. Marx and Lenin were gods, and communism was ‘scientific materialism’, and only a mentally ill person would dare question it.

Truth and facts are neutral. So, the Power is naturally selective with the truth. The Power encourages its commissars to dig up all manner of dirt on the other side(s), even rewarding those who manufacture falsehoods(as with the Russia Collusion Hoax, Assad Gas Attack Hoax, and Jussie Smollett Hoax). Thus, so-called secularism is often irrational and/or anti-factual because the Power usually won’t sacrifice its control for the truth.
In a genuine liberal-secular democracy/republic, free speech and free discourse could easily boomerang on the Power as the educated class(often filled with resentment against the rich and privileged) may well critique the Power itself. Indeed, this is exactly what happened with the Anglo elites in the US and UK. For all the men of talent committed to their side, they also had to contend with the increasing chorus of criticism from within and outside their own ranks, not least from Jews.

In regards to the Power, there are two natural tendencies among the People: Submission and Rebellion, and the two tendencies often co-exist. As often as not, rebellion is borne of resentment of not having been favored and/or approved by the Power than based on any real principle, though all rebels pretend they are motivated by higher values. The same goes for submission, i.e. people join the Power and collaborate for personal gain, careerism, and peace of mind(as dissent can lead to harassment, purging, and even death) than out of any deep conviction. Most people bend than stand.

At any rate, the Power in a free society is as likely to attract criticism and pushback as cooperation and support. The opposition could be a matter of partisanship or personal conscience, no less than with compliance. When Anglo-Americans ruled the US, they had both lots of supporters and lots of critics.
Of course, the impact of the criticism altered the character of the ruling elites, in which case the once-supporters could become the new critics and once-critics the new supporters. Or, the change came about because the character of the support was altered by the influence of media and academia.
After all, even the supporters of the Anglo-American Christian Order were under constant bombardment from the Jewish-controlled media, and their children(groomed to work for the Power) were shaped by the increasingly Jewish-dominated academia.
Consider the fate of the GOP. Not only did the leadership come under Jewish influence and mandated a new set of ‘values’ for Conservatism Inc. but the rank-and-file were also altered by Jewish Influence and exerted pressure on the leadership to change course; or else, they might leave the Party for the Democrats or the Independents.

Butt-Tucker Carlson on the Deep State Indictment of Donald Trump

Video Link

No doubt, Jews understood this aspect of the secular-liberal dynamics of Power. Free Society meant free speech, and free speech meant the freedom of conscience and the free play of ideology to critique and challenge power and authority. Indeed, no group did more to involve itself in taking apart, deconstructing, exposing, and invalidating the existing concentrations of Power, indeed so much so that Jewish influence became almost synonymous with social critique, dissent, ideological radicalism, and other modes of rebellion/dissidence, what with even anti-Jewish groups and those at odds with Jewish agendas developing a grudging respect for Jews as standard-bearers of civil liberties. Now, we know it was either just a ploy or something Jews came to regret.

Secular freedom is a double-edged sword for any power faction. One can use free speech to spread and defend Christianity or to mock and expose it as a delusion or hypocrisy. One can use free speech for or against Marxism. Secularism, in and of itself, doesn’t have sacred cows, and that means ANYTHING can be critiqued, appraised, questioned, or defended.
Marxists understood this feature of liberalism all too well, which is why they made Marx and Lenin sacrosanct in order to consolidate their power. One could question, criticize, and condemn religions, capitalism, feudalism, traditionalism, liberalism, and etc. in a Marxist state, but one could not question the ‘scientific’ and ‘materialist’ truth of Marx and Engel’s ideas. If secularism in a communist state could critique and diagnose Marxism like any other ideology or worldview, it could be delegitimized in due course, not least because many Marxist policies didn’t pan out as promised.

Jewish Supremacist capitalists are no different from the Marxists in their grip on power. Even though Jews today are super-capitalists and the LAST THING they want is communism(to rob them of property), their absolute hold on power cannot tolerate unfettered free speech. They prefer a sacral-secularism, or ‘secularism’ whereby Jews get to pick and choose what is holy and unholy. As official religions run counter to secular principles, Jews use the media and academia to generate sacred icons and narratives. That way, Jews can have the cake and eat it too: Jews can maintain what is ostensibly a secular order without an official religion but manage a population that believes and behaves as virtual spiritualists on certain matters.

Under this arrangement, there are three kinds of qualities: Holy, Material, and Unholy. ‘Holy’ are those subjects that command reverence & piety and, therefore, cannot be discussed freely; one must idolize, mourn, and/or celebrate them. As the Michael Jackson and Oprah cults have shown, people can be made to feel ‘holy-schmoly’ about just anyone or anything.

‘Material’ are those subjects that are unrelated to the Holy and, therefore, can be discussed freely: Like the science of dairy products or the migratory behavior of birds(though not matters such as Covid and ‘climate change’ that could serve as effective mechanisms of Jewish control and/or profiteering).

‘Unholy’ are those matters that pose a danger to the Holy and, therefore, cannot be discussed freely; they must be condemned outright and, in the absence of legal protection of free speech, banned, as is already the case in the UK, Canada, and EU.

MLK, Mandela, George Floyd, Globo-Homo, and Jews are part of the Holy. All Good People are led to gush about them. Covid-19 and ‘vaccines’ also entered the realm of the Holy; the ‘jabs’ and the boosts, for a time, became like communion rites. If you dared to discuss Covid-19 freely and speculate as to the effectiveness of Ivermectin, you were hounded as a blasphemer into horse-deworming witchcraft.

Most diseases and treatments remain within the ‘Material’ realm, or open to free scientific discourse, but Covid-19 and the ‘vaccines’ still aren’t; the only allowable ‘science’ is the one pushed by the Jewish Globalist World order that controls the Deep State, Big Pharma, and Big Media. Indeed, notice how the naysayers of the ‘vaccines’ were effectively ‘excommunicated’ from the church of trust-the-science(or schwience).

And of course, anyone who dares to freely discuss the problems of racial differences, black crime, Jewish perfidy, homosexual decadence, tranny nuttery, and etc. is immediately deemed as ‘Unholy’. All means are employed to ban such voices from the media, academia, and even internet platforms that once came closest to the ideal of bastions of free speech.
Like the Marxists in communist countries, Jewish Supremacists realized that their absolute grip on power isn’t tenable in a world of free flowing opinions and ideas where anyone and everything can come under scrutiny, criticism, and reappraisal.

‘Unholy’ views are immediately and roundly attacked as ‘far right’, ‘hateful’, and etc., which is funny coming from the ethnic-power-group that has committed the most violence and mass killings since the end of the Cold War. Just ask the Arabs and Muslims whose homelands were ravaged by Neocon warmongering. They were the victims of Jewish-Supremacist policies that direct the cuckish aggressions of the Anglo-managed US and UK.

Something of the Jewish character emerges from a consideration of Anne Frank and Leo Frank. The comparison may seem perverse as one was an innocent victim of Nazi inhumanity whereas the latter was a pervert-murderer. But what is truly troubling is the similarity of the Jewish reactions to both icons, and it has something to do with the notion of Denial, a term usually associated with the Holocaust but which applies so often to Jewish reactions to events.

Even to this day, Jews are in USS Liberty Denial mode. While Nazi horrors were many times more murderous and destructive than Israel’s attack on the US ship, the nature of the lie is the same: A pathological inability to face up to the truth for purpose of ethnocentrism. (Ironically, Holocaust Deniers and Holocaust Liars have more in common than they realize. Both are invested in History as Faith, either in the total innocence or the absolute guilt of the Germans. This false dichotomy has made it virtually impossible to have a true historical discussion on the subject as anyone suspected of ‘revisionism’ is thrown into the Denial Camp.)
What really matters is the attack on USS Liberty was clearly a hostile act by Israel, but to this day, Jews refuse to own up to what happened. And, it’s not just the Israeli government, which would at least be understandable, but Jews all around the world. What does this say about Jewish Power and the general character of Jewishness when most Jews aren’t willing to face up to the most obvious facts?

And if Jews aren’t willing to face up to what happened to the USS Liberty, why would they be any more honest or principled on graver matters? And if most Jews, ‘conservative’ and ‘liberal’, so readily circle the wagons on something so obvious and undeniable, the only logical conclusion is that, for most Jews, ethnic unity and power take precedence uber alles.

Besides, it’s not as if Jewish criminality has been limited to isolated incidents like the USS Liberty attack. Jewish finance played a significant role in the expansion of European Imperialism, not least the Anglo kind. Jews played a key role in the Atlantic Slave Trade(at least in South America) and the sale of opium to China. Jewish merchants played a role in the Westward expansion and the ‘genocide’ of the American Indians. Jews wiped Palestine off the map, and Jewish radicalism played a key, even decisive, role, in the spread of communism and its horrors that led to the deaths of millions. And since the end of the Cold War, World Jewry have been the main butchers of the world as overlords of the lone superpower, the US, the foreign policy priority of which has been to appease Zion at every turn. Just ask the Iraqis, Libyans, Syrians, and many others. And, Jews have been the main conceivers of this bogus contrivance called ‘wokeness'(or Jewokeness) that sows poison seeds in the souls of whites(mainly via Afromania and Globo-Homo degeneracy) and prepares the West for White Nakba.

But, because Jewish Power has been dispersed among various nations in which goy ‘buffers’ have often been employed to do the bidding of Zion, much of Jewish Evil has been attributed to anyone and anything but the Jews. So, the Iraq War is blamed on George W. Bush and ‘Neocons'(with Cheney and Rumsfeld as the most prominent faces), and most of the current lunatic policies are blamed on Joe Biden even though he’s just a puppet of his Jewish Handlers.

While Jews have reasons to accuse the goyim, goyim have reasons to accuse the Jews. Indeed, apart from the actions of National Socialist Germany built on a Jew-free foundation, thereby making its crimes its own, it’s not so easy to differentiate the Jewish Role from the Goy Role in the ‘crimes’ of the Modern West. Jews, like the Irish, collaborated in much of British Imperialism. If most Irish did it as foot-soldiers, Jews did it as financiers. So, ironically, National Socialism rendered Jews the most innocent of European crimes during the Nazi Era, whereas the Western Powers that welcomed Jewish participation made Jews accomplices in their ‘racist’ domination of the world.
Not that any of this matters in the current Jewish-controlled Historiography whereby we are to believe Jews were always pure-as-snow innocents who were totally blameless of Western Imperialism and, if anything, the main poor hapless victims of Western ‘antisemitism’.

Though Anne Frank and Leo Frank are two very different individuals, both have been shrouded by Jewish Lies. Thus, what unites them is the culture of Jewish Mendacity. Never mind the stuff about Anne Frank’s story being partly embellished by her father. Never mind the rather ludicrous canonization of some Jewish Girl as the new madonna. We can accept that she was a nice girl and met a sad fate(though she died of disease than gassing or a bullet to her head).
The big lie is in propping up her cult as the main face of Jewishness, thereby creating a false impression as to the why of anti-Jewish hatred. It’d be like using some Japanese girl who died in Hiroshima as the main face of Japan’s place in World War II.

Now, clearly many innocent children of all nationalities perished in the war, and there’s nothing wrong with remembering and mourning Jewish children who died in the Shoah. And Japanese children who died in the war should be remembered as well. But the war against Japan wasn’t about some crazed desire to kill innocent Japanese girls. Rather, Japanese children were the unfortunate and tragic casualties of a war in which powerful Japanese adults decided to play with fire. To understand Japan’s role in WWII, one needs to focus on the politicians, industrialists, military men, ideologues, and the Emperor.
Likewise, even though many innocent Jews, even children, were persecuted and killed in WWII, no real understanding of the Jewish Role in that war can be understood without taking into account the dangerous and even reckless roles played by Jewish radicals, bankers, gangsters, fraudsters, corrupters, and perverts. Remembering Anne Frank as a sad child victim of History is a decent thing to do, but using her as the Face of Jewishness in the Modern Era is specious.

After all, Germans could do the same. Consider all the innocent German children who were killed by bullets or bombs, or who were raped(most likely by Soviet troops), or perished from starvation and disease. All such lives should be remembered, but it’d be foolish to pretend that a tragic story of some child in Hamburg or Dresden exemplifies Germany’s role in World War II.
No, Germany got embroiled in the horrors because of Adolf Hitler and his reckless worldview(though it certainly wasn’t helped by Josef Stalin, FDR, Winston Churchill, and others itching for some kind of major conflagration).

The Anne Frank Cult as the face of the Holocaust Narrative overlooks the role of Jewish Power that led to the rise of Hitler and the National Socialists. Germans went over to the dark side not because they wanted to harm innocent Jewish children but because they had-it-up-to-here with the crimes and corruptions of Jewish Power. Tragically, in handing power to a bunch of radical Anti-Semites, there was the danger of innocent Jews getting it in the neck as well. But innocent Japanese also got burned for the crimes of their rulers.

Granted, it isn’t always easy to draw a clear line between guilt and innocence. After all, many Japanese supported the policies of their rulers. But then, their minds were largely manipulated by the rulers who controlled the media, so there was a kind of circular logic to the mania. Likewise, many Jews did nothing to restrain the vileness of their tribal elites(and little has changed over the years as Jews like Norman Finkelstein and Max Blumenthal are exceptions than the rule) and a good number of them participated, though not as key players, in the vile machinations of their tribal leaders. (In some cases, certain radical Jews overreacted to Jewish bad behavior with an extremist ideology, such as Marxism that ended up causing greater harm to the average goyim than to the capitalist class.)

So, absolute guilt and absolute innocence are virtually impossible. One could say children are innocent, which is true enough, but it’s only a matter of time before children are indoctrinated into soldiers of the regime, much like it’s only a matter of time before tiger cubs grow into predators. Children are innocent in the moment but not in their destiny, which is shaped by external forces; besides, even the internal drives of human nature leads one to aggression, competition, domination, or submission to dominant forces.

If Jews used an innocent girl, Anne Frank, as the face of all Jews who suffered or were killed in World War II, Jews denied the guilt of Leo Frank altogether even though he was most certainly guilty of the rape-murder. A case of rape-murder denial. Though only one girl was raped and killed by Leo Frank, the Jewish pathology behind the denial isn’t much different in kind from the denial of those who naysay all documented details of the Shoah.

In some ways, it’s worse among Jews because, whereas Holocaust Denial is a fringe cult among goyim, Leo-Frank’s Rape-Murder Denial has been the mainstay of Jewish Power and the Jewish Majority, much like the USS Liberty Attack Denial. Add to this the Jewish Virtual-or-Emotional Denial of the Rosenbergs’ guilt in slipping atomic secrets to Stalin. While most Jews came to admit the Rosenbergs were guilty of the act, they melo-dramatized the Narrative to make the Rosenbergs and other communists the ‘victims’ of ‘red-baiting’ and ‘paranoid’ anti-communists. So, even when Jews acknowledge that a good number of Jews were involved in treason and treachery, they canonize the guilty as ‘victims’ while reviling the prosecutors as thick-skulled persecutors of all things decent and humane.

Leo Frank was eventually lynched by a mob that just about had enough. He was only one person, indeed the only Jew ever lynched on American Soil. Therefore, it may seem ridiculous and perverse to compare his case with the Holocaust where, purportedly, 6 million Jews perished(though the real number is probably half that), Anne Frank included.
The US was good to Jews, whereas Germany of the Nazi period was horrible for Jews. Yet, history and truth aren’t merely about the numbers. One Jew or Six Million Jews, the motivations of goy hatred could be the same. Thus, what the Leo Frank Case(the death of one Jew) and the Anne Frank Case(the death of millions of Jews) have in common is the Jewish tendency to commit horrific crimes and use the tribal network to circle the wagons, which can only lead to Jew-hatred.

Luckily, such Jewish behavior led to only a minimum of anti-Jewish violence in the US(relatively speaking), but the goy rage in both US and Germany shared a common thread. In the US, southern white goyim were more than willing to give Leo Frank the benefit of doubt and his day in court. Frank wasn’t treated like some Negro but had all the legal defense one could hope for. Yet, time and time again, the facts proved his guilt beyond a doubt, and the proper thing for Jews would have been to make him face justice. But, what did the Jewish community do? They circled the wagons. They chose tribal ethnocentrism over justice for the dead goy girl.
Apparently, the life of a Jewish rapist-murderer was more precious than the life of a goy girl seen as little more than a shikse whore(later to replayed by Roman Polanski’s case, the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, and the pardoning of Jonathan Pollard whose treachery cost the many lives of double-agents in the USSR). Jews not only refused to face up to facts but tried to frame a Negro. And then, the Jewish Press slandered southern whites(who’d been kindly to Jews) as a bunch of raving ‘Anti-Semites’ when they’d offered Leo Frank every opportunity to prove his innocence. The real issue isn’t that Leo Frank was a creep. All groups have their rapist-murderer creeps; John Gacy was no Jew. The issue was the Jewish Community went out on a limb to protect a fellow Jew despite his obvious guilt(and things are even worse today, with Jonathan Pollard giving the US a middle finger as he swaggers around Israel as a ‘hero’).

The Southern White Goy community just about had enough and took matters into its own hands. They grabbed Leo Frank from the jail cell and lynched him. The goy rage wasn’t much different from what would happen among Germans during the Weimar Period, in which many German Jews, backed by World Jewry, did horrible things to the German economy, culture, and political process, which they would repeat all over again in Russia of the 1990s.

But, the difference is German Rage put radical Anti-Semites in power, and the Nazis entertained a worldview eerily similar to that of Jews: supremacism. Just like many Jews felt their tribal brethren could never do wrong and circled the wagons to protect one another, guilty or innocent, the National Socialist direction for Germany was Aryans Uber Alles.

Still, the rage that drove many Germans to support the National Socialists wasn’t much different from the rage felt by the Southern White mob that finally had had enough of Leo Frank. In both cases, goyim were driven to the limit by Jewish vileness. Historically, Germany had been less anti-Jewish than most European nations, but it dawned on Germans that their relative niceness only emboldened Jews to take advantage. Likewise, historically the American South had been more hospitable to Jews, but how did Jewish gratitude manifest itself? Jews circled the wagons to defend the loathsome Leo Frank, the rapist-murderer of a white Christian girl. (One of the advantages of post-WWII Germany was the near absence of Jews, allowing for an order of national trust and good will. However, Jews have been resettling in Germany in the past few decades, and they are up to the same old tricks. It does no good for Germans to have learned their lesson of history when Jews learned nothing or only the wrong lessons, i.e. they were always pure-as-snow and it was always the goyim’s fault.)

Most crucially, both the US and Germany failed to do the right thing. In the case of Germany, the new regime went after ALL Jews. Even if many Jews had acted badly, there was no reason to target all Jews as the majority of Jews hadn’t been gangsters, communist radicals, or financial thieves. And some were patriots who had fought in World War I and respected German culture. In going after all Jews, National Socialism disgraced itself and finally blackened German reputation with war and genocide.
One would like to believe the American Example was the right one. After all, Americans didn’t go after all Jews but targeted one Jew, the guilty Leo Frank. Not that Jews ever appreciated this as they lionized Leo Frank as a saint, and the organization that grew out of the incident, ADL, now serves as the ‘moral’ bullwhip of Jewish Power and pushes for Censchwarzship.

Still, it’s surely more sensible to go after the one guilty Jew than go after an entire community. Better to kill one bad person than kill ‘six million’, among whom the good are mixed with the bad. Yet, Americans also made a fatal mistake in the Leo Frank case. While only Leo Frank was responsible for the rape and murder of the white girl, much of the Jewish Community was downright vile and verminous in trying to exonerate him out of tribal solidarity that smacked of racial supremacism: “We Jews are above the law when it comes to harming lowly goyim.” (What’s truly disgusting is that, even after all these years, Jews have doubled-down on the rape-murder denial and pretend as if Leo Frank is their own ‘Emmett Till’, all the funnier when even the real Emmett Till wasn’t the ‘Emmett Till’ of myth, though St. George Floyd takes the cake when it comes to perfidious Jewish-manufactured idolatry. Even though the white mob was pushed to extreme measures against Leo Frank because of the dirty Arnold-Rothstein machinations of the Jewish Community, Jews have blamed only the whites, never themselves.)

The real shame of the Leo Frank case isn’t that some lowlife Jew was lynched. It’s that White Americans didn’t go far enough and do more. While it’s a good thing that White Americans never became radically deranged like the Germans under National Socialism, they failed to realize that the main villain of the Leo Frank case wasn’t Leo Frank himself but the Jewish Power Network defined by Jewish Tribal Supremacism.

Indeed, Leo Frank would have been summarily tried and sentenced, and that would have been the end of that had it not been for obnoxious Jewish meddling. The case was prolonged and perverted because Jews pulled every string in the book to prevent justice for the rape-murder victim. So, while Leo Frank was guilty of his crime, the Jewish Power Network was guilty of something far more egregious and consequential: Corruption of the justice system, and for what? Jewish supremacism that holds in contempt the humanity of white girls regarded as ‘shikse’ whores.

So, White Americans shouldn’t have stopped with Leo Frank. They should have started a movement to root out the networks of Jewish corruption and villainy. This doesn’t mean they should have become like raving Nazis and gone after innocent Jews or done what they did to the Japanese-American population during World War II.
Rather, at the very least, they should have done something to root out what essentially operated like the Jewish Mafia. The failure to go after the culture of Jewish corruption, supremacism, and nihilism has led to the rise of Jewish Networks that now rob the world through Wall Street and Big Pharma, that perverts the law to let Antifa thugs and BLM lunatics to run riot and get a slap on the wrist if arrested… while the January 6 protesters are denied the most basic of legal rights and parents who protest anti-white CRT agenda are labeled as ‘domestic terrorists’ by vile Jewish supremacist Merrick Garland(who almost became a Supreme Court justice). The US that went after the Italian Mafia failed to do likewise with Jewish Criminality, though it’s hardly surprising as the Jews played it smarter than the ‘goombas’ and coordinated their criminal activities with an equal foothold in the world of legitimate business and the law. (And later with the cult of the Holocaust, no one dared to risk the accusation of ‘antisemitism’ by noticing ethnic patterns in Jewish perfidy.)

So, if Germans went too far in their reaction to Jewish Evil by going after ALL Jews, even good ones, White Americans didn’t go far enough by fixating on the individual Jew while overlooking the power of the Jewish Network.

#Jerusalem #Pride is somewhat unique among Pride marches as it tends to be more family friendly and has a large religious attendance blasting Jewish songs and dancing. pic.twitter.com/D3n11lahtm

— Tzvi Joffre (@TzviJoffre) June 1, 2023

After all, it makes no sense to see Jonathan Pollard as merely a bad Jewish individual. He did what he did as part of a Jewish Network, and this network, with tentacles in academia-media-government-banking-etc., eventually pulled all stops to spring that lowlife scum from prison. Germans under National Socialism, in going after bad Jews, even went after innocent Jews, destroying the lives of girls like Anne Frank as well. White Americans thought the problem would be solved by taking out Leo Frank the bad Jewish individual while overlooking the fact that Leo Frank managed to elude justice for so long because of the Jewish Power Network operating on the premise of Jewish Supremacism and total contempt for ‘filthy goyim’.

The Ideal Way for Americans would have been to Name the Jewish Power, to expose the Jewish Network. Jewish Evil isn’t a simple matter of bad individuals acting on their own but, more often than not, a matter of a bunch of Jews acting in concert within a network. It’s like the Mafia, which is why RICO laws were necessary to bring down the underworld empire. Just going after individual mafia hoodlums(as if they’re lone wolf street thugs) hardly made a dent on the mafia network; it was like cutting off one tentacle off an octopus that merely grow new ones. To take out the Mafia, the individual crooks had to be linked to the network and its bosses.

Likewise, Leo Frank was protected by the Jewish Network, which later canonized him as a saint, much like Tony Kushner did for the Rosenbergs in ANGELS IN AMERICA. To prevent the cancerous growth of Jewish gangsterism, White America should have gone after the Jewish Network and exposed it for what it is.

Granted, it would have been more difficult with Jews than with the Italian-Americans whose criminality was more specific to a social milieu. Indeed, Italian-Americans who broke from the Criminal Community tended to assimilate into Anglo-Americanism or Generic Americanism.
In contrast, even Jews who operated within the law retained a powerful sense of tribal identity and loyalty, rendering mafia-like much of the Jewish networks in academia, media, government, and etc. Rudy Giuliani became just a New York mayor and did little for the Italian-American community. The idiot Cuomo Brothers are mainly careerists and have nothing to do with Italian-ness(and don’t wanted to be associated with ‘Fredo’). But look at Jews like Victoria Nuland, Wendy Sherman, Merrick Garland, Stinkin’ Blinken, and the rest of them, and they are NOTHING without Jewish Tribalism. Indeed, the demands of Jewish Tribalism are so strong that even goyim in politics cower before its will. Even Donald Trump who, in 2016 boasted that Jews don’t own him because he’s so rich, did little in office but take it up his arse from the Jewish Lobby and beg, “Can I suck your dic*?”

What the West needs is a RICO-ist approach against Jewish Power Network. The evil didn’t end with Leo Frank. He almost got away with the rape/murder because of the Network, the same reason Roman Polanski has been able to sit nice and pretty all these years without facing justice.
Indeed, can anyone explain the silence surrounding the USS Liberty incident without taking the Jewish Power Network into account? And, what really happened on 9/11 and how lies were spread in the media(essentially a Jewish Power Network) to rouse public support for Iraq War? Or how Jews managed to rape the Russian economy in the 1990s? Did just a handful of Jews, as mere individuals, manage to pull off the heist of the century all on their own? Or, were they enabled by the Worldwide Jewish Network? And consider the Russian Collusion Hoax. The Covid Hysteria and the rigging of the 2020 election. These were not done by isolated individuals but by the Network with links in government, media, academia, courts, finance, etc.

So, the lesson of the 20th century in regard to Jewish Perfidy is that the Germans went too far and the Americans didn’t go far enough. Collectivist Germans, in going after Jewish Evil, went after an entire population. Individualist Americans, in contrast, targeted only the individual while ignoring the power of the Jewish Network.
Indeed, it is precisely because the Network was left alone in the US that Jews even managed to push the narrative that Leo Frank was some innocent saint lynched by a crazed ‘Anti-Semitic’ mob that one day got off their asses to kill a totally innocent Jew just for the hell of it.