A nagging problem for the ‘conservative’ side has been the ever-shifting configuration of the holy-vs-unholy spectrum. Naturally, people want to be associated with the holy than the unholy, no less than people prefer warmth and light over the cold and dark.

There’s a reason why most people gravitated to God and church than dark magic and satanism throughout Western History. One was holy, the other unholy, or evil. People want to feel justified than damned.

So, the question is, which side is holier?

During the Cold War, the Right had holiness points as the defender of the US as God’s Country and Land of the Free against communist slavery. But post-communism, the glow faded, and the conservative attempt to sanctify itself against the next Unholy Enemy fizzled out.
After 9/11, the ‘clash of civilizations’ narrative gained a degree of relevance, even urgency, but it turned out Islam couldn’t be vilified like communism. While all of communism could be condemned, the ONLY way the West could interfere in the Muslim World was by extolling the GOOD side of Islam.
After all, if Islam itself was declared as the enemy, all Muslims would be compelled to unite against the West, leaving no Muslim allies for the US in the invasion of certain Muslim states(especially hated by Jews).
Therefore, the West had to reassure the Muslims that the beef was not with Muslims per se but with terrorists who ‘misused’ Islam. Also, unlike the Soviet Union, the Muslim World turned out to be weak, easy to conquer and push around(though difficult to build Western-style institutions in). The US handily destroyed Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and much of Syria. As such, it was a hard sell to spin the so-called War on Terror as the New Cold War(or even World War III or IV as some neocons argued).

The fall of the Soviet Union left the American Right without a worthy enemy to demonize, against which to bolster its moral authority. Whereas anti-white politics was not only permitted but encouraged, even ennobled — with the German Nazis and the KKK made into the devil incarnate — , it became socially taboo to expose and condemn the dark side of Jewry and the savage nature of blacks. The main narrative was about Holy Holocaust Jews and Civil Rights Blacks leading humanity toward salvation from the ‘rabid’ and ‘virulent’ ‘racism’ and ‘antisemitism’ of the white race.
Of course, the Right was traditionally more associated with skepticism of racial ‘progress'(especially concerning blacks) and distrust of Jewish influence. It would have been less problematic for the Right absent the taboos against ‘racism’ and ‘antisemitism’, but in the post-war era, such attitudes came to be deemed not merely disrespectable but evil, indeed not merely evil but the greatest evil.
As the biggest threat to the white conservative ideal of a good society came from Jews and blacks, white conservatives naturally should have pitted themselves against Jews and blacks as the biggest rivals.
In contrast, Jews and blacks correctly identified white conservatism/rightism as the biggest obstacle to their own tribal agendas and expended their energies on blaming and shaming whites.

The key difference was the Holocaust and the Civil Rights Narratives narrowed History to a simple but powerful tales of ‘white racists lynching innocent blacks’ and ‘white Anti-Semites gassing millions of saintly Jews’. All of white-Jewish-black history was condensed into “Whites must answer for Anne Frank and Emmett Till.” With Jewish and White Liberal domination of the academia and media, the Judeo-centric and Negro-centric Narrative became pervasive with each passing generation raised on Anne Frank cult and MLK worship.

Also, World War II, the greatest war of all time and the ‘Good War’, was characterized as a war of Liberal-Left Alliance(especially of the US and the USSR) against the Far Right. The ensuing Cold War did pit the West against Leftism-Communism of Russia and its satellites, giving new life to the American Right that even went so far as to use the communist-threat narrative to put the American Left and Liberals on the defensive as either Fellow-Travelers or Spying Traitors, but the Right bungled this with the drunken Joe McCarthy and the deranged Roy Cohn.
If anything, Jews and Liberals pulled a Judo move and turned the issue of leftist subversion into one of ‘Red Scare’ or ‘anti-communist hysteria’ whereby the American far-right and demagogues violated US Constitutional liberties in pursuit of witches and monsters under every bed.
With Jews and Blacks gaining the moral authority to bash whites while the American Right failed to capitalize on anti-communism as a viable domestic issue, the only way American Conservatives could make themselves seem tough and uncompromised was with foreign policy issues.

The end of the Cold War robbed the American Right of a formidable enemy that could inspire genuine fear and anxiety among many Americans. And the foreign policy debacle of George W. Bush made the American Right seem even more irrelevant(not to mention incompetent), especially as the Neocon-captured GOP based its global policy on appeasing Jews to win over to the Republican side. Also, even during the Cold War, the American Right had more or less accepted the main argument of American Liberalism and the Jews, namely that the biggest evils are ‘racism’ and ‘Anti-Semitism’, especially by whites, or more precisely, whites of Northern European stock. (When Italians badmouth Jews in gangster movies, it seems less offensive and even amusing, whereas there’s no forgiveness for pale Northern Europeans even whispering anything faintly ‘Anti-Semitic’.)

Anyway, what became the holiest civilizational themes and objects following the end of the Cold War? There was virtual unanimity on the holiness of MLK & Magic Negroes, Jews & Holocaust Worship, and then holy homos as well.

Now, few things are intrinsically holy or heroic. Sanctity depends on the control of the narrative, the spin, the dissemination of myth. Jesus was a heretic who deserved to die according to the Jews. It was the heretical Christians who made Him out to be the Messiah, and this Narrative was later enforced by the Roman Empire. In National Socialist Germany, Horst Wessel was a saint-hero. To anti-Nazis, he was a worthless creep. A ‘god’ in the communist world could be the devil in the anti-communist world. The Powers-that-be shape what is holy and unholy. The consecration of homos and even trannies goes to show that, for most sheeple, their notion of holiness is decided for them by the Power with the control of hype & media and carrots & sticks. The unholy who dare question Bruce Jenner as Caitlin Jenner are purged.

In the 60s, MLK was a polarizing figure. He was revered by many but not all, and it was acceptable to be critical of him. Many in the Deep State actively worked against him. Even into the 1970s, he was still a human figure, a tragic mortal.
But by the 1980s, even conservatives and National Review had nothing but praise and pretended he was a ‘conservative’.
During the Reagan decade, it was still within acceptable bounds for conservatives to denounce Mandela as a terrorist and lend support to South Africa as an ally against the Soviet Union in the Cold War. By the 70s, Jews had become more or less sacrosanct, but blacks had yet to become ‘magical’, and homos were far far away. Even Liberals routinely made fun of homos in movies, TV shows, and stand-up comedy.

Also, many people still put God, Jesus, and Country above Jews, blacks, and homos. God, Jesus, and Country were holier than anything else.

But over the years, God and Jesus have lost their luster, so much so that, in the eyes of many, they need to justify themselves in service to bigger gods, namely Jews, Negroes, and Homos. No one gets purged for making fun of God, Jesus, or the Church. For many people, Christianity must repent before homos and Negroes than the other way around.
This dire state of affairs is really the product of the sanctification of Jews. Once Jews were elevated as the Holy Holocaust People, the new christ-messiahs of the West who died for the sins of white folks, the trajectory became “Give Jews whatever they want… because they are holy”(and besides, they got the money, the media, and the dirt on everyone to blackmail).

So, whatever Jews wanted got favored, whatever Jews opposed got disfavored. How could Americans say NO to the god-people, now bigger than god himself? The murmur among politicians, pundits, and business class was “How do Jews feel about it?” If word got out that Jews were for mass-legalization of gambling, even ‘conservatives’ stopped opposing the vice, especially as donations came their way from casinos. If Jews were against free speech, then no one dared to oppose ‘hate speech’ restrictions(and no one dared to note that Zionism could be construed as hate speech against Palestinians and Iranians). If Jews were for Globo-Homo, no one dared oppose the push for ‘gay marriage’.
With hardly any truly viable conservative(or even genuinely liberal) elite to push back against such trends, the masses were left without choices. When your supposed representative or spokesman declines to defend the truth and natural norms, the only voice heard is from the other side. Jews waged war on American Conservatism, but the biggest sound from the ‘right’ was ‘We love Israel’ and ‘We must defend Jews from the Democrats'(even though Jews totally dominate the Democratic Party).

Now, there are cases where people risk the stigma of the unholy. One big reason is material interest. Hypothetically, were the anointed ‘woke’ agenda to push for outright communism, big capitalists will likely side with unholy ‘anti-woke’ types to defend their wealth. If one had to choose between the holy & loss of wealth and the unholy & keeping of wealth, most will go for the latter. MLK and Globo-Homo may be holy in our age, but if the side that was most ‘woke’ demanded an end to capitalism, most capitalists would side with the ‘unholy’ bunch of ‘racists’ and others.

But all things being equal — the holy side being as pro-wealth as the unholy side — , the rich and powerful will stay on the holy side. Why not be rich and blessed than rich and cursed?

Now, who decides what is holy and unholy? Those with the power to mold the ideas, icons, and narratives. It’s the Jews, of course, who also reward fulsomely the goyim who cuck while punishing those who don’t. Take William F. Buckley. He had the choice of siding with Joseph Sobran and speaking truth to Jewish Power or sucking up to Jewish Power. He did the latter, and he was showered with praise as the ‘good conservative’, i.e. Jews are holy, and ‘goodness’ is a measure of how much one sucks up to Jews and shines their shoes.

In bygone times, the GOP had two advantages vis-a-vis the Democrats. Society wasn’t so politically correct and did not look upon Jews, blacks, and homo as holies. Also, as the Democratic Party was closely associated with corrupt unions(the bane of Big Labor in yrs to come) and tarnished as being soft on communism, many Americans voted for the GOP as the party of private property and enterprise. Furthermore, the Democratic Party used to be the bastion of Southern Segregationist and white ethnic working class who often didn’t see eye to eye with blacks. It wasn’t a monolithic tool of Jewish Power.

So, even capitalists who were socially liberal or anti-conservative might vote for the GOP for economic interests or ideological reasons. Or personal ones as free enterprise was seen as a matter of personal choice. Indeed, much of the financial support for the GOP in the 1980s came from the Californian entrepreneurial class of go-getters who felt hampered by Democrats and Big Labor. So, even as the Democrats were gaining more in holiness points(as Jewish Power was elevating Jews, Negroes, and Homo as the special people), many Americans stuck with the increasingly unholy GOP for material and/or personal reasons: Less taxes, less regulation, more money in your pocket.

But Bill Clinton came along and stabbed Big Labor in the back and the Democratic Party adopted the global economic policies of the GOP. As a result, the Democrats got the combination of holiness aura and material advantage. With the Democratic Party as a clone of the GOP on economic matters, the GOP lost its remaining appeal to the rich and privileged. It was left with the worsening taint of unholiness as the party that was less liked or even hated by Jews, blacks, and homos.

Of course, the GOP went out of its way to praise Jews to high heaven, claim MLK as a ‘conservative’, and even warm up to homos. But the perception was that holy Jews still felt more at home in the Democratic Party, magical blacks saw the GOP as ‘racist’, and angelic homos regarded the GOP as ‘homophobic’.
In the 1970s, a TV show like DUKES OF HAZZARD could proudly display the Confederate Flag. Today, it’s risque to say “It’s Okay to be White”, authorities do nothing to arrest thugs who tear down white monuments, and even after blacks loot and burn down cities, the only thing Donald Trump and Republicans had to say was “George Floyd is a saint, oh boo hoo.”
Back in 1968, the Democratic Mayor Daley ordered men to “shoot to maim, shoot to kill”, and even Democrats were shocked and appalled by radical leftists and black thugs. Daley also told MLK in no uncertain terms to go to hell for insulting Chicago. But as blacks are now holy, any amount of black lunacy can be sanctified with BLM catechisms against the Devil of ‘systemic racism’, a meme pushed by Jewish Power. Today, whiteness itself has become

unholy, what with Chick Fil-A(now Dick-Fill-Ass) CEO washing Negro feet even as blacks use their feet to stomp innocent whites.

If there is a person seen as good and a person seen as bad, people will favor the ‘good person’, that is unless the ‘good person’ is bad for business whereas the ‘bad person’ is good for business. But once the ‘good person’ is okay with your ‘greed’, you will naturally favor him over the ‘bad person’. It’s like during Prohibition. One bought alcohol from gangsters because they were the only ones selling it. It wasn’t because one liked or respected gangsters. But once alcohol was made legal and legit again, everyone got it from legit outlets and abandoned the gangsters.

This is why the ‘culture war’ has been crucial. It’s actually a neo-religious war to decide which side is holy and which side is unholy. The biggest failure of the Right was letting Jews get away with everything. With mounting Jewish Power, Jews got to decide what is holy and unholy. As Jewish Supremacism is hostile to white power(autonomy and independence), appeasement of Jewish Power could only doom the white race.

There should have been a push-back against Jewish Power, a counter-narrative, forceful, rational, and moral. Paradoxically, the most effective way to be anti-Jewish(power) is to reject ‘antisemitism’. It’s like the best way to counter religious dogma is not to be anti-religious. Radical atheists turn people off because they are utterly unhinged in their hatred and intolerance of religion. A more effective way to counter theocracy is to acknowledge religion has its place in history, society, and culture, and then to call for ideological pluralism where all voices are heard, secular and religious.
Likewise, the best way to counter Jewish Power is to drop ‘antisemitism’, which properly defined, should be “blaming Jews for EVERYTHING BAD” or “emphasizing only the BAD things about Jews without acknowledging their contributions to humanity”. The biggest harm to countering Jewish Power has come from Neo-Nazi types, and this is why ADL goes out of its way to exaggerate the ‘prevalence’ of Nazis around every corner. Bill Buckley was right to reject this kind of ‘antisemitism’, but he failed to conceive a way of counter-critiquing Jewish Power relentlessly ragged on Wasp Power and Christianity.

Also, one doesn’t need to reject the basic truth of the Shoah or Holocaust(even after disregarding the fiction of the six million). Rather, a context can be provided as to why such a horrible tragedy came to be(and could happen again if Jews don’t stop with their craziness). It’s like Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even if one believes they were inhuman and unnecessary overkills, the fact is Japan played with fire by invading and terrorizing other nations. Even if anti-Japanese hatred become unhinged, the Japanese did much to invite the hatred.
Likewise, Jewish Power was immense in the 20th century, and it’s no fantasy to state that Jews used networks to financially exploit nations and/or to spread radical movements that, prior to WWII, had already killed millions of people. That does not justify the Holocaust, but it partly explains why there was so much anti-Jewish hatred. Hatred can often become unhinged and insane, but why does it exist in the first place? After the Great Famine, can anyone blame Ukrainians for hating Jews who played such a big role in communism?

Indeed, even without being anti-Jewish(power), one could change the political discourse by focusing attention on what may be the BIGGEST (stealth)revolution since the end of World War II. The end of the Cold War and the rise of China pale in significance to the Jews replacing ‘WASPS’ as the ruling elites of the US.
This stealth-revolution was so BIG and so PROFOUNDLY consequential on the global scale, but there has hardly been a book written on it. This ethno-power-revolution took place in what soon became the Lone Superpower with the demise of the Soviet behemoth. It was the death knell of Old America and the frankenstein-conception of a new one. It meant a wholesale reordering of culture, foreign policy, and values.
One cannot understand the ‘logic’ of ‘systemic racism’, globo-homo celebration, wars in the Middle East, and anti-Russian hysteria without addressing the Jewish Factor predicated on “Is it good for Zion?” Jews vilify ‘white racism’ and ‘white privilege’ to prevent nonwhites and idiot-whites from noticing that it’s the Jews who hold supremacist power in the US.

Jews are nervous about people discussing the Ethno-Elite-Revolution of Jews replacing Anglo-Americans as top dogs. Even when Joe Biden fulsomely praised the Jewish domination of media/entertainment for spreading globo-homo and ‘gay marriage’, Jews were hush-hush about it.
It suggests that even Positive and Flattering commentary on the Jewish takeover of the US is threatening to Jewish Power. At the very least, it can spread consciousness that JEWS do control America, thereby the West. That way, people may be more privy as to why certain trends are favored, certain events are nudged to happen, and certain views are suppressed. There is the Jewish Hand behind it, whether good or bad. Even in praise, the recognition of Jewish Dominance eventually means more scrutiny and criticism, as ‘democracy’ means the people speaking truth to power.

The Jewish Takeover of Power in the US, in praise or condemnation, needs to be a major subject of history, discussion, polemics, and criticism. At the very least, people will know who is the real Boss in the US. Likewise, whether one was fond of the Irish or not, he needed to know that big cities were dominated by the Irish Machine. The US is the most powerful nation, and it was controlled by Anglo-Americans for most of its history, and then Jews took over. Can any so-called ‘democracy’ be worth its name if everyone is afraid to name the power and if anyone is ‘canceled’ for doing so?

Why isn’t the story of the Jewish takeover of America as big as the Bolshevik Revolution, National Socialist seizure of power, Mao’s revolution & then Deng’s ‘counter-revolution’, and the fall of the Soviet Union? Arguably, it is the biggest story because of the stature of the US as the Lone Superpower.
Furthermore, it wasn’t as if Anglos and Jews switched roles, with the former taking up the mantle of opposition against Jews as the new rulers on the throne once occupied by Anglos. American Politics would have been healthier if Anglos took up the role of the underdog elite nipping at the heels of the top dog elite.
Instead, it was more like a total unconditional surrender on the part of the Anglos who, in some ways, were defeated even worse than the Japanese in World War II. And just like the Japanese became subservient lapdogs to the US empire, the Anglos became the biggest cuck-dogs of the Jews, which made Jewish Power all the more formidable, arrogant, and dangerous. In besting the Anglo-Americans, Jews didn’t create a future rival aiming to get even with Jews(as usurpers) but a servile class of cucks devoted more to Jewish Power than their forebears had ever been to WASP power. It was as if the Anglos finally found their true master in the Jews as a kind of Second Coming. This was great for Jewish Power in the way that postwar Japan and Germany proved to be invaluable to America. Despite their total political subservience, Japan and Germany were economic powerhouses in servitude to the US empire. Likewise, Anglo-Americans, despite their defeat were far from destitute, and all their knowledge, skills, and wealth were in total subservience to Zion.

Many Northern-European-Americans still have lots of wealth and high-positions. Many work in key fields of engineering, retail, and agriculture. They are still numerically large and very capable. But all their work and effort, all their taxes and donations, are going to serve Jewish Power.
Indeed, Jewish Power alone would be less dangerous. Even with all their wealth and influence, Jews lack the numbers to run and manage the empire. Jewish Supremacist Power depends on the subservience of the most capable population in the world, the people of Northern-European stock in Europe and America. What is the European economy without the UK, Germany, and Nordic nations? What is the US(and Canadian) economy if not for Northern Europeans(who achieved so much more than Southern-European types who came to dominate Latin America)? So, when Anglo-Americans lost to the Jews, they didn’t get off the train but manned the engine room to make the locomotive run faster for Zion. Jews didn’t kill the Anglo but tamed him to obey.

As to why Jews or BUGS(busy urban globalist semites) gained power over Wasps, it surely has to do with a combination of IQ, personality, Big Think impulse, tendency, Covenant-mentality, history of networking via finance, control of image/idols, and ‘inner-majority’ strategy.
Jews do have higher IQs than whites. But they also have a pushier personality, which is why Episcopalians lost out despite comparable IQs. Also, contra the empirical-pragmatic style of Anglo thought, Jews go for prophetic big-think thought, i.e. ‘smaller thoughts’ of goyim become caught in their wider net of Big Think, which is appealing as an all-encompassing comprehensive formula. Also, Covenant-mentality allowed for a stronger sense of identity among Jews — how else do a people maintain their own identity despite 2000 yrs of exile? Indeed, Jews were paradoxically more fluid and Zelig-ish in identity precisely because they were so strong in core identity. Jews could affect different identity-poses wherever they went because they were so confident of their core identity. When a people with a weak core identity try out another identity, they risk becoming subsumed into that other identity. In contrast, a people with a strong core identity need not fear ‘assimilating’ into other identities because they know their inner core identity will remain intact. Also, Jewish mastery of finance meant that their wealth was fluid. Unlike land or material property, it could be moved all over the world(and instantly with the emergence of electronic communication). And of course, Jewish control of media meant Jews got to decide which image is holy or unholy. Jews = holy holocaust, blacks = sacred slavery, whites = KKK + Nazis.

But another reason for Jewish triumph over Wasps was the factor of ‘inner-majority’ power. There is the ‘outer majority’ and the ‘inner majority’. Demographically, there are many more white Christian gentiles than Jews. Whites are the outer-majority to the Jews as the outer-minority. But people don’t operate as a whole. It isn’t as if all whites think, feel, and work together. People work as individuals or small groups. So, when it comes to the inner-workings of society, one thinks and acts as an individual or an intense group, or ‘intensity’. This means that even a people who are an ‘outer-minority’ can function as an ‘inner-majority’.
Suppose one people(A) have 100 people and another people(B) have only 5. Now, People A are clearly the outer-majority over People B. 100 to 5, it’s so obvious. But suppose everyone in People A operates as an individual whereas everyone in people B operates as an intense group or an intensity. So, when it comes to inner-workings of power, it’s always an individual of People A vs five members(or intensives) of People B. Thus, even though People A are the demographic majority over People B, it’s the People B who operate as the power-majority over People A.

In combat terms, imagine one army of 100 men and another army of 5 men. Naturally, one would think the 100 would easily defeat the puny 5. But suppose the 100 men army are made up of individuals who never work with other men. They prefer to fight alone. In contrast, the 5 men army always fight together. So, even though it outwardly seems a case of 100 vs 5, it is inwardly really a series of 1 vs 5. In every confrontation, it’s ONE among the 100 going against the FIVE of the 5. So, in each confrontation, the Five beat the One. And over time, the unit of Five slays all 100, one by one.

The problem with Anglos was they were far less tribal than the Jews. Still, when the US was gloriously race-ist, there was some sense of unity among the whites, elites and masses alike. But once ‘racism’ was turned into the biggest sin among white folks, white elites dared not call for white unity. American Conservatism became a matter of ‘individual rights’ and ‘individual liberty’. But that meant each white person was on his own in a battle against Jews who were always united in identity and agenda. Jews even circled the wagons in solidarity with Jewish communists being targeted in the so-called McCarthy Era, but you see no white unity even as Jewish Power blacklists, purges, and destroys any white voice it doesn’t like. Monsters like Jennifer Rubin called for purge of populists(the kind who voted for Trump), but the GOP still extols her as a ‘fellow conservative’.

BIDEN’S NATIONAL ANTI-SEMITISM STRATEGY, END TIMES CULTS, RAINBOW CORPORATIONS | KNOW MORE NEWS

Video Link