One way to delineate the Left vs. Right divide is as a clash between the Ideal and the Real, between the Utopian and the Pragmatic. Or between the experienced and the untested, in the sense that even what had begun as utopianism became, over time, ‘established’ with a set of dogma and sense of limits, i.e. it grew more conventional and even conservative, more concerned with authority and order than adventurism and risk-taking, which has been the story of communism(and Christian orders based on the ‘radical’ ideas of Jesus).

There’s much truth to this but not the whole truth. There’s always been a Rousseau-ean aspect to the Left. As an Mexican elder says in THE WILD BUNCH, “We all dream of being a child again, even the worst of us…” The allure of dreams, though one might say nostalgia for childhood is more reactionary(in dreaming of a lost paradise) than revolutionary(in dreaming of paradise yet to discover).
But, the Left also developed as a reality check. The modern left originated with the intent of waking history from its slumber. The masses were trapped in the dream of the Divine Right of Kings, God & Heaven, and virtue of meekness. In truth, kings and noblemen were merely human like everyone else. They weren’t special or innately superior despite all the pomp and posturing. And was there ever proof of God & Heaven? Should the clergy have so much power and influence when their institution is based on a myth? And why should the people be meek and humble when the vain elites live in opulence and feel contempt for the unwashed(contrary to Christ’s teachings)?

Much about the French Revolution was meant as a reality check on the state of things. It argued that the regal monarch is just a man, like you or me. So, why should he be revered and obeyed? And why should his heirs take power and hog the wealth and privilege? By what right should they rule over the people?
The Left, in its commitment to reality and reason, also spilled the beans on religion and clergy. The coming of the Enlightenment called for demonstrable proof, and there was no evidence to Biblical claims. Besides, even as the clergy preached the Christian message of meekness, many were corrupt status-seekers catering mostly to the rich and powerful. In ANY institution, it is usually the opportunistic, cunning, and shrewd than the honest, principled, and scrupulous who make it to the top.

So, the Left was trying to wake people up from the historical slumber dominated by kings, noblemen, and the church. What did Napoleon mean when he said, “China is a sleeping giant. Let it sleep”? He meant it’s better for China to remain ‘rightist’ and static than go ‘leftist’ and dynamic. It was conservative China that was asleep in its Middle Kingdom conceits. So sure of itself and its civilizational values, it failed to wake up to the reality that the West surpassed it in every measure of power and wealth. Before Western Imperialists ventured into China, there were obvious clues that China must fundamentally reorder society to remain a great power and deter foreign threats. But it kept on sleeping in its smug ‘rightist’ conservative dream of superiority and security. It was the introduction of Western Liberalism and Leftism that forced many young Chinese to wake up and smell the coffee(than the usual tea). It was this materialist perspective that urged them to break out of Confucian conceits(of the useless literati) & Taoist musings and accept the material dimensions of reality: Facts over Feng Shui. It’s no wonder communism was appealing to so many young Chinese in the early 20th century. It spoke of history as hammers and nails than brush and ink. It called on China to wake up from its pipe dream, made worse by the sale of opium that kept a large segment of the Chinese, from top to bottom, in a state of slumber.

Karl Marx argued the people should wake up to the truth of history. He called religion the opiate of the masses. He argued that the main engine of history is not Great Men, Spiritual Ideas, or Philosophy but the struggle for the control of material reality. Throughout history, the elites found clever ways to exploit the masses and hog most of the wealth EVEN THOUGH it was the masses who did the heavy-lifting. He regarded capitalism as both a liberating revolutionary force and an exploitative form of new oppression. Capitalism was liberating in that it was totally materialist, something it shared with socialism. It accepted matter as the true basis of power. Titles such as king or duke meant nothing to capitalism. Neither did God nor spirituality. Capitalism was about property, investment, factories, and technology. It was about the buying and selling of materials and labor that turned raw materials into manufactured goods. To facilitate investment and transfers of wealth, capitalism relied on ever more elaborate schemes of finance. Because capitalism focused on the material world and real results, it revolutionized technology and profoundly transformed the landscape, along with human relations based on production and distribution.
However, because it was focused mainly on profit and finance(with its warping influences), capitalism faced two problems, one moral and the other economic. Capitalists were indifferent to the toiling masses as long as their profits increased. Even though finance is supposed to serve the material economy, it could take on a life of its own and create a form of economics that defies material sense — today, Wall Street and globalist banks cook up ever more surreal ways to increase wealth. Jews as ‘made men’ with insider information grow ever richer and buy up everything.

So, in that sense, Marxism was to wake people up from the dream of kings & queens, myth & religion, and the ‘virtues’ promoted by the powerful to hoodwink the masses. It also warned that ‘liberalism’ and ‘individualism’ were smoke-and-mirrors used by the propertied class to justify their exploitation and wealth. Their real power owed to control of materials via capital, not abstract ideals about ‘freedom’. The powerful could use freedom to amass more power, whereas freedom without power was an empty promise.

For the exploited masses, ‘freedom’ was meaningless because they lacked the material means to pursue their own interests. So, true freedom for the masses could only come by control of the material means of production.
Why did so many Russians join the Revolution? World War I and its social impact woke them to the realization that Tsar Nicholas wasn’t some wise grand patriarch, the father of his people, but a half-wit, fool, and weakling. Nicholas, the biggest rightist force in Europe, had been asleep about reality and history. He thought the people would remain loyal to him as the loving father of his people; he loved them and they loved him, or so he thought. What a rude awakening for him.

So, there was a side to leftism that was about waking up to reality and seeing the light. The Left grew out of the Enlightenment. Let there be light and let us look upon reality with a clear eye. Let us be critical of the power. Let us ask questions than accept conventions as sacrosanct.

But the Left had its own problems arising from arrogance, ignorance, ur-spirituality, and limitations of man. Some on the Left were so sure of their truth(supposedly based on science and reason) that they became intolerant of and even murderous toward those who disagreed. Despite the conceit of true knowledge and reason, mankind can know only so much. An expert in one field knows nothing of other fields. And even experts in their own fields often turn out to be wrong(or they cravenly cater to the Power). What was ‘certain’ in medicine a hundred yrs ago, or even fifty years ago, may be null and void today.

And there is the ineradicable ‘spiritual’ nature of man. Those who admire Anthony Fauci as a SCIENTIST but light candles to his icon. Even those who claim to be totally rational and materialist(or secular) have a secret need to divide the world into the holy and the unholy. Consider the Holocaust, Globo-Homo, and the Magic Negro. Holocaust should be treated as a historical subject, but it’s become a religion where one must not question the numerology of the sacred six million. ‘Gay rights’ became Gay Rites, a cult of sodomy as the wonder of the ages. Homos used to argue their cause on secular grounds of individual rights. Today, they insist that religious institutions fly the ‘gay’ banner. And if anyone says homo fecal-penetration is gross, he or she must be purged, shamed, and blacklisted. It’s the ‘inqueersition’. Indeed, anyone critical of the homo lifestyle has no chance of rising up the echelons of government and industry. Globo-Homo is the official faith of the Deep State and Big Capital. You better get on your knees, take it up the arse, and BELIEVE… or else be cast into the purgatory of demotion or unemployment.
And consider the BLM nonsense. Most blacks are murdered by other blacks, and if anything, cops save a lot of black lives. But as blacks are now holy objects, ANY instance of a black thug killed by cops is an act of blasphemy or ‘blaxphemy’. Michael Brown was a thug who got killed in Ferguson for attacking a cop. He never said, “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot”, but that became part of the Sacred Narrative among blacks and white progs.

How does one account for such nonsense among people who claim to be rational, secular, and modern? Because human nature is ‘spiritual’, and that means even those who reject God and the Church will crave and seek new icons, idols, and crusades. Notice how all these white progs kneel at the feet of MLK, Mandela, and Obama(and Oprah too). These people claim to be moral or righteous, but theirs is a form of fanta-morality, or morality based on fantasy. True morality must be based on reality. In the Current Year, so much moral outrage is based on so little truth.

Of course, the choice of Jews, blacks, and homos as the holy trinity is largely the result of Jewish Supremacist control of media, academia, finance, and whore politicians. Jews promote themselves. Jews value homos as analogous allies in turning Leftism from Mayday to Gayday. In the past, many Jews were of working class background or starving intellectuals. They were sincerely on the Left. Today, 50% of Jews make over $100,000 a year. Jews are the richest people on Earth. Jews want to keep the brand of ‘leftism’ and ‘radicalism’ but in service to their wealth and privilege. So, why would Jews favor traditional leftism when something like communism would be devastating to their grip on power?

Indeed, even in the Soviet Union where many Jews had an auspicious start, they eventually lost out to non-Jews. Current Jews are arch-capitalists who cling to the ‘leftist’ brand as a shield — they grow ever richer through capitalism but get accused of being ‘socialists’ or ‘communist’ by the Idiot Right. When billionaires are lumped with ‘communists’, it works as moral cover for their wealth and privilege in the eyes of disgruntled ‘progressives’. Look how Bernie Sanders ran as a ‘socialist’ and then urged his idiot herd to vote for Hillary or Biden(who serves super-rich Jews).
Maybe Sanders was once a true socialist, but now, he’s a Jewish Supremacist first and socialist second. There are commie-types among Antifa, but they are useful to Jewish Capitalists because Commie Thought says, “Greatest Evil is Nazism and Racism.” So, as long as the Jewish Capitalist Media sound the alarm that there are ‘white supremacist’ and ‘neo-Nazis’ afoot, the dummy ‘commies’ are too busy attacking whites to ever get around to attacking capitalism and the oligarchy. (Traditional communism argued that capitalism, not fascism, is the biggest enemy because Fascism and National Socialism are merely fake-revolutionary movements used by capitalists to capture populist sentiments. In other words, fascism is merely iron boots capitalism. But most of today’s commies are the product of pop culture. Their ideology is based more on TV shows, rap, and punk/grunge music than a true understanding of the history of the Left. If German capitalists protected and funded the fascists to beat the communists, Jewish capitalists today use the ‘commies’ to beat down the ‘nazis’.)

In truth, US politics is pro-elitist on both sides of the aisle. The priority of both the Democrats and the Republicans is to prop up the elites who congregate in the ‘center’. Democrats appeal to nonwhites & white proggies for votes, and Republicans to whites & conservatives. But once elected, politicians of both parties serve the oligarchs and grow fat themselves. Democrats are about suckering the ‘leftist’ masses to serve the rich, and Republicans are about suckering the ‘rightist’ masses to serve the rich. Donald Trump was hardly different in this but was loathed by both parties for having given the elites a bad rap as the ‘swamp’. Of course, Trump did it for himself than for the people — he bashed the elites to win populist votes to be president and cozy up to the elites — , but the elites wouldn’t have any of it.

If Leftist Ideology is based on ‘what ought to be’ than ‘what is’, could one argue that capitalism is leftist? Or that the West has been leftist even prior to the French Revolution, perhaps going back to the Renaissance? In a way, capitalism is incentivized by ‘what ought to be’. It is tireless in coming up with new ways of production, transportation, communication, leisure, and etc.
Take the invention of flying machines. Most of humanity had given up on such dreams as impossible. Birds can fly, man cannot. But Western Man was not content with the reality that man is a terrestrial creature. He had to keep striving for ‘what ought to be’ until it was finally realized. So much that seemed impossible, ludicrous, or fantastical 100 yrs ago, let alone 200 yrs ago, have been achieved. Back in the 1980s, only rich people had portable(and cumbersome) phones. Now, people have slick cell phones even in the slums of the Third World. People in the early 1990s didn’t even know something like the internet revolution was even possible.

The West advanced faster than the Rest because it pushed for ‘what ought to be’ than ‘what is’. People during World War I were amazed by new technologies, but they were obsolete in a mere two and half decades in World War II. And who would have thought something like nuclear power would arrive so suddenly?
Steve Jobs came to greatness in the second chapter of Apple by imagining ‘what ought to be’. A declining company became the biggest in the world. Granted, ‘what ought to be’ is more sensible in science/technology than in social ‘science’ as objective than subjective standards apply, but ever-competitive capitalism is always fixated on ‘what ought to be’ than merely ‘what is’. Companies operate on the premise that ‘what is’ now will be obsolete and replaced by products closer to how it ‘ought to be’.

Leonardo Da Vinci made illustrations of flying machines. He failed to create one, but his mind was certainly in the mode of ‘what ought to be’, and such attitude did stimulate the West beyond the boundaries of the ‘possible’. And in time, so much that seemed impossible became possible.
Leftism seems to share this spirit but in the field of social science. In many areas, there have been key reforms and successes because of leftist pressure and visions of a better society. To be sure, this drive for progress emerged in the West prior to the rise of the Radical Left. Columbus had this spirit when he went on his voyage. Otto von Bismarck was a rightist-conservative but committed to creating a modern prosperous Germany with social services. And ‘right-wing’ autocrats of Asian nations after WWII were all invested in creating new orders; they embarked on tasks that seemed forbidding and impossible at the time.

Granted, even as both the ‘right’ and ‘left’ in the modern world keep pushing for new possibilities and improvements, it’s generally true that the Right has a better sense of limits than the Left does, especially as the Modern Right has abandoned old superstitions and rigid hierarchies, in large part under liberal pressure.
So, while rightists will adopt or accommodate certain socialist policies, they don’t believe in panaceas. They are less puritanical, even though puritanism is usually associated with the Right, not least because modernity rebelled against the moral teachings of the Church, especially on sexual matters.
But, when it comes to holier-than-thou fulmination, the left tends more toward puritanism. The Right can be judgmental and repressive but don’t believe in Heaven on Earth. It accepts sinfulness and the imperfection of the world. It’s like Franco’s Spain tolerated the Left as long as it didn’t make trouble.

In contrast, the Leftist order seeks to uproot all crime-think and seed the mind with correct ones. No wonder George Orwell became alarmed with leftist totalitarianism. And Jonathan Haidt finds the leftist mind to be more arrogant and intolerant in its outlook. It’s not enough for the Left to control society; it must take possession of souls. Protestantism began as a proto-leftist puritanical challenge to the Catholic Church that seemed compromised with the reality of power and wealth.

The current ‘left’ is rife with problems in that it’s radically perfectionist in its imperfectionism. It especially denounces Nazism as an evil obsessed with ‘Aryan supremacist perfectionism’ and urges all people to be more ‘inclusive’, or tolerant of differences. But then, it insists that sodomy is some holy act and that trannies must be celebrated and lionized. And the ‘body positive’ movement doesn’t merely say we should tolerate fat or ugly people but hail them as ‘beautiful’. It is the narcissism of the ugly. The Imperfect is the ‘New Perfect’. Also, it fetishizes blackness as a supremacist heroism that all races must idolize. Forget about the ‘Aryan superman’ but believe in the Afro-Aryan-superman who is so awesome that white men should cuck at his feet and offer up their daughters. Arno Breker is out but Afro-Breker is in. Indeed, Leni Riefenstahl went from fetishizing Aryan supremacism to Afro-supremacism(as noted by Susan Sontag).

The left vs right dichotomy became especially complicated and confused in the West because of Christianity. As the official faith of the West, it became a symbol of establishment and conservative values. But Jesus was a rebel-heretic-maverick Jew who pissed off Jewish Conservatives. And His message was and remains eternally radical(though not a radical call to arms).
It alarmed the Jewish elders of the time and infuriated the Jewish tribalists through the ages. All of Jewish History was about the children of fathers and mothers who, in turn, became fathers and mothers over their children and so on. So, despite the spiritual content, it was grounded in the reality of biology and history. In contrast, the Christo-myth says Jesus is the miraculous Son of God. Though born of Mary, she was only a vessel. And, He didn’t have sex or get married. He lived the life of the Perfect Man and died and defeated death. Such a fantastical story and message are more suited to leftist than rightist thinking.
Also, whereas Rightism tends to be particularist — our tribe, our culture, our people — and hierarchical, the universal and egalitarian thrust of Christianity is closer in spirit to Leftism, which is universalist.

But, Christianity became the religion of the rich and powerful in the West. And the Enlightenment associated Christianity with kings, noblemen, corrupt clergy, superstition, reaction, and etc. But the meaning of Christianity never favored the rich and powerful. (One might argue the development of the Roman Church was a betrayal of Christianity in welding the pacifism of Christ with the militarism of the Romans. In time, inspiration became an institution. Granted, all things require institutions to survive and propagate, but Catholicism turned worship of faith into obedience to an institution. But then, Christianity exists with or without the Catholic Church or any church for that matter. All one needs is the New Testament.)

There were many Christian progressives who believed the Faith must be on the side of the powerless than the powerful. Many Italians were both Marxist and Catholic. Still, one might say Christianity is conservative or rightist in its moral judgmentalism. It calls for social order in admonishing people to be sober, solemn, and pious. Leftism, in contrast, has a rebel streak. Many anarchists and early Marxists spoke of Free Love and other sexual experimentation. Some tried to fuse Marxism with Freudianism. And to that extent, Leftism was neo-paganist at odds with the moralism of Christianity. Ancient Greeks were certainly more libertine than the ancient Jews and Early Christians.

But then, to the extent that the pagans were cold-eyed about power and reality, they were closer to ‘rightism’ and proto-fascism. The Romans saw the world in realist terms of winners and losers, the victors and the vanquished. In contrast, Christianity said the material winners of this life could be spiritual losers in the afterlife. Paganism’s no-nonsense view of power could be construed as ‘rightist’ in contrast to Christianity’s abstract view of power as it ‘ought to be’: The meek and powerless in this world could be(as they ought to be) the powerful in the next life(while the rich and mighty in this world may burn in Hell for all eternity). Perversely, current ‘leftists’ have the puritanical mindset of hardline Christianity and the puerile sensibility of paganism at its most degenerate. It’s as if the characters in FELLINI SATYRICON got ‘moralistic’ in celebration of debauchery: “I’m holier than thou because I take my kids to Drag Queen story hour.” It’s as if we are living in a bad dream because strange things happen in dreams, and the Current Year is very strange indeed.

Leftism may be based on a dream but with an intuitive understanding that most people lack the power to dream and rely on some other, higher and greater, force to provide the dream. They want to be be part of this bigger dream.

MLK’s (I Have A)Dream seems to be the New American Dream. Dream in the literal sense is what we all do when we sleep. Dream-as-metaphor is what we inhabit in the real world. There is no such thing as absolute living-in-reality as our understanding of reality is subjectively shaped by our hopes and fears. When taking a stroll, we are often just barely aware of the surroundings so as not to trip over or get hit by a car. Otherwise, we hardly acknowledge or think about the reality before and around us. We don’t think, “I’m walking on a concrete sidewalk, this is a parking lot with those cars, that is a tree, that is a person with a grocery bag, those are children playing, that woman is riding a bike, that is a cat, etc.” Instead, our minds generate thoughts and feelings that hold most meaning for us. It could be about personal relationships, but it’s often about things that interest, stimulate, and provoke us. And these are often narratives, stories, images, idols, and issues, not least because people with smartphones are always ‘hooked’ to their favorite ‘channels’. These function as something more than mere knowledge. When a person watches some show about hapless innocent blacks terrorized by the KKK for the umpteenth time, one doesn’t coolly think, “There was a time when certain white groups used violence against blacks in the South.” Rather, those images linger in the mind as dreamlike ghosts. They haunt the psyche and lurk in the soul. Thus, they function as dreams than mere knowledge. In this sense, we are all living in a dream, and mankind always has.

Among primitive folks, a shaman or storyteller who tells the tales that implant the listeners with heroes, villains, and visions that take on a life of their own. Thus, the listeners come to partake of and inhabit the world of the dream-weaver. Why do Jews clamp down on Free Speech? They want to control the Dream Machine. They want all of us to be characters in their Dream Play, just like every instrumentalist in an orchestra plays a socially subordinate role to the conductor who, in turn, is ‘spiritually’ subordinate to the composer. So, even though we all exist as individuals in the physical sense, our minds are often NPC-like in the Dream of another. Under Stalinism, countless Soviet citizens were NPC-like minions of Stalin’s Dream of Power and Justice. Under Maoism, so many Chinese youths were NPC-like minions of Mao’s grand dream. All those Germans under National Socialism fell under the spell of Adolf Hitler, a great orator who could pull people into his dream of Germany.

It may well be that conservative types are less dreamy than those on the left. This quality may keep them closer to reality(or more ‘based’), but it also implies they are more dependent on the dreams of others who have the power to dream. Why can’t conservatives create their own Hollywood, their own dream-machine? Even as they complain about the Liberal/Leftist control of Hollywood and other dream-centers, they rely on the Other for visions and narratives. The fact that so many German conservatives and rightists threw caution to the winds and surrendered to Hitler’s dream suggests that one’s inability to dream doesn’t necessarily lead to more reality or clarity but to reliance on the dream of others.
This may explain why American Conservatism sucks so bad. Without the power to dream, it relies on the dreams of the other side, even in opposition: ‘Diversity Is Our Strength’, ‘MLK was awesome’, ‘Gay Marriage is a conservative value’, ‘Muh Israel’, ‘Women in the Military’, and etc.

Reality has a problem: It’s a real bummer. Does a fat ugly woman really want to accept the fact of her gluttonous repulsiveness? Do American soldiers really want to know they’re mercenary whores of Zion than patriotic heroes? If the Right is about realism, why are so many rightist types religious and believe in some Jewish carpenter as the Son of God who offers salvation? How realistic is that?

Dreams are more appealing than reality, and most people prefer reality at a bare minimum necessary for survival. This is why truth upsets so many people, especially if the Dream has elevated certain ideas or groups to holy status. So, honest talk about Jewish Power or black crime or homo degeneracy upsets people who’ve come under the spell of the Jugromo(Judeo-Negro-Homo) dream of Tri-Supremacist Holiness.

Granted, what is currently ‘acceptable’ depends on the nature of the Dominant Dream. At one time, even most Liberals believed that homosexuality was a mental problem, even a disease. In either case, pro-homo or anti-homo, it wasn’t merely about facts but a mythic vision of them as either darkly corrupting pathological villains(as they were portrayed in so many movies even up to the 1980s) or pure-as-snow angels of ‘rainbow’ wonderment.

We are living in the Jewish Dream. Even those who are cast as villains and deplorables are part of the Dream because they explain themselves in accordance with the dream logic. For instance, most ‘conservatives’ will say “I’m not racist” or “I’m not homophobic”. They are morally defensive than morally autonomous. They accept the rule-book of the Dream that says ‘racism is evil’ and ‘homophobia is wicked’. They don’t ask why it’s called ‘racism’ when ‘-ism’ simply means belief. If Ism means belief, race + ism should mean belief in the reality of race.
Of course, race is real because evolution is real, and different groups evolved separately. But even if we accept ‘racism’ to mean ‘racial supremacism’, shouldn’t people condemn Jews for supremacism in demanding that the West favor Jews uber alles and Israel over Palestinians(and Muslims & Arabs in general)? For the sake of moral consistency, it is wrong for Jews to say that privileging whiteness is evil BUT favoring Jews is wonderful.

However, such illogic can be ‘logical’ in a dream, a Jewish Dream, one in which Jews blame whites of ‘racism’ but practice ‘racism’ to the hilt for their own power and privilege. And yet, white conservatives who are demeaned as ‘racists’ by Jews go out of their way to prove they are NOT ‘racist’ by sucking up to Jews and praising Israel that is so blatantly ‘racist’ to Palestinians. It’s like Jews say Donald Trump is Hitler but Trump goes out of his way to prove he’s not a ‘racist’ by totally supporting Zionist ‘racism’ against Palestinians and imperialism against Iran/Syria.

Thus, even white conservatism operates within the hegemony of the Jewish Dream. It lacks moral autonomy and agency. It is essentially an NPC that plays according to the Jewish Dream Logic that is an affront to moral consistency. How is it that Jews can denounce whites as Nazi but then ally with sub-nazi types in Ukraine? How is it that Jews can condemn supremacism but demand governments to shut down BDS, a movement that calls for equal justice for Palestinians?

Or take ‘homophobia’. Any conservative who says “I’m not a homophobe” is an NPC in a Jewish Dream because, by the very nature of his denial, he accepts the reality of ‘homophobia’. But Jews made up that bogus term to imply that anyone who counters the globo-homo agenda or makes fun of homos is suffering from a psycho-pathology.
In fact, ‘homophobia’ doesn’t exist. While some people hate homosexuality or have strong antipathy to homo behavior, it is not a phobia which specifically means extreme fear and panicked response to something harmless. ‘Homophobia’ exists as an article of faith in the Jewish Dream.

In truth/reality, homos do indeed exist as some people are born homo, and this reality must be accepted, and social policy should be based on this fact. But it’s also true that homo-fecal-penetration has no biological or moral worth, and it makes no sense to celebrate sodomy with ‘rainbow’ colors.
And now, we are told there’s ‘transphobia’ because many people still insist Bruce Jenner is a man and not a ‘woman’ or because they object to penis-and-balls-cutting as sound medical practice. What kind of sane medicine mutilates and removes perfectly healthy organs because some deviant demands it?

Also, if truth is a matter of subjectivity — “I’m a woman because I feel that I’m a woman even though I got penis and balls” — , what happens when such ‘logic’ is applied to race and other attributes? Is a dumb person a ‘genius’ because he says so? But maybe we are there already because so many mental midgets are now promoted as public intellectuals, especially if they’re black or tranny. All such craziness is allowed because we live in The Dream that is Jewish. As Jews control the media, academia, deep state, and the megaphone, they are the dream-weavers. What they show on TV, teach in school, publish in books/magazines, and allow on platforms comes to determine the narrative, the myth, idols & icons, and the Current Year map of Good vs Evil. No wonder then, even though Jews turned the Holy Land into Sodom & Gomorrah and dump on white Christians all the time, most Evangelicals are always bellowing about “Muh Israel”.

The world is like The Dream because most people lack the power to dream. So, they rely on the dream of others. Much of the film MULHOLLAND DR. takes place in the dream of a woman, but her dream unfolds according to the dream logic of Hollywood fantasy. So, even her own dream is part of a bigger dream, the myth of stardom and cult of celebrity. In TWIN PEAKS THE RETURN, David Lynch’s character meets Monica Belluci in a dream who says, “We are like the dreamer who dreams and then lives inside the dream. But who’s the dreamer?”

Who is the dreamer of The Dream we are all part of? In that dream, we are mere phantoms because our ‘thoughts’ and ‘actions’ all follow the ‘logic’ and over-will of the dreamer. We are ‘free’ only as NPCs. Jewish Power is the Dreamer. All of us dream little dreams when we sleep but our waking life is part of The Dream of Jewish Power. In that dream, we are programmed to feel and behave in accordance with the ‘rule’. In whose game we’re effectively NPC’s without true autonomy of thought, freedom, and liberty.

But then, is liberty an effective counter against The Dream? Libertarians tell us so, but what if most people are incapable of being free and independent? In that case, The Dream can be countered only by another Dream. It means history can never be about dream vs reality but dream vs dream. Reality is too harsh and dreary for most people. No wonder then that even fat ugly women go to hair-dressers and cling to the fantasy that they are attractive. Indeed, it has gotten even more delusional with all this tranny business. If a gross-looking man can be a ‘woman’, who says a fat ugly woman can’t be a beauty? This anti-essentialist subjectivism all points to how dream-ism has infected so much of society. Such lunacy is intrinsic to The Dream pushed by Jewish Power. REQUIEM TO A DREAM. You may be nothing and have nothing, but YOU ARE SPECIAL because you’re part of The Dream.

‘Reality’ and ‘logic’ in The Dream is as Jewish Power programs them. So, even though blacks are the main thugs and killers, we are led to chant BLM and cry for precious black lives being ‘genocided’ by white police. We prefer fanta-morality than real-morality. It’s utterly absurd as a claim in the real world, but countless people living in The Dream keep the faith.

The Dream is so powerful and pervasive that all of us are, in one way or another, part of The Dream, if only because we must always remind ourselves and others that it isn’t real. Thus, no one is really fully awake. Either you go along with The Dream or you’re a lucid dreamer who knows you’re in The Dream but can’t really break out of it. As we are all social creatures, we can’t help but be part of the prevailing order. So, if much of society is still in The Dream, we are also partly in it because we are part of society. It’s like even anti-Hitlerians under National Socialism couldn’t fully escape The Dream. It became too much of the life and culture.

The dream is sort of like a game, especially a con-game. Cons work because the con-man slips something through a distraction. Thus, the conned fail to see the reality of what is happening as he or she is fixated on what is shown. It’s why the woman falls for the con in HOUSE OF GAMES. That the woman is ‘too smart to be conned’ is actually part of the con devised against her.
Dreams work in a similar way. We believe in the unbelievable in the dream — dead people alive in front of us and etc. — because the dream turns off the mechanism of verification and detection. The dream keeps streaming new ‘information’ to distract the mind from verification. While what happens in a dream isn’t logical, there is a logic behind the process of the dream that keeps the dreamer hoodwinked. And even when a person becomes a lucid dreamer, he is in the dream.

What is true of a single mind is true of an entire society, especially when everyone is connected electronically. Electronic media are like collective neurons of society as a hive-mind. But who’s the dreamer or game-creator? Who is the ‘user’ and who are the ‘programs’?

People’s minds are colonized by the electronic-neurons beamed by the media, the Dream becomes their dream, and they become part of The Dream Empire or Dreampire as envisioned and programmed by the Jews. So, even though Sigmund Freud failed as a scientist(as current psychology believes he was wrong on most things), his obsession with the power of dreams served as a blueprint of soul conquest.
Marx was utopian but concentrated on material reality. But, all the talk of labor, production, and etc. got pretty dreary to most people. Capitalism beat communism not only in the material sphere(in producing more) but in creating the Empire of Dreams, which Chris Hedges calls the Empire of Illusion. No wonder Jews were so eager to acquire Disney and then STAR WARS. Goyim Walt Disney and George Lucas had the power to create dreams.

Dream as a metaphor for power is explored in EXISTENZ by David Cronenberg where goyim move inside a maze created by a Jew. Even as they identify the Dream-Maker and kill him, they’re not sure if they’re back in reality or still in the Dream. Even the Anti-Dream could be part of the Dream. And such is true in our world. Even those opposed to Jewish Supremacism are marked by the ‘logic’ of The Dream. Those opposed to Jews tend to take on the role of ‘nazis’, ‘white supremacists’, ‘anti-semites’, or etc. Richard Spencer’s Alt Right crashed-and-burned in that very manner. Neo-Nazi types can’t oppose Jewish Power without resorting to ‘Muh Fuhrer’, but it’s because they lack the autonomous power to dream. Therefore, they must borrow the dream of Hitler to combat the Jewish Dream instead of creating a new and better Dream from scratch.

How do a people replace one Dream with another? A New Dream in which most people become figures in another Dream. They become NPC’s in another people’s game. US politicians, ‘conservative’ and ‘liberal’, are little more than NPC’s in the Jewish Dream.

One way to replace one Dream with another is by invasion. The US defeated Japan, erased the myth of the sacred Emperor, and installed the new Dream of Japan as a peace-loving democracy, which, however, must take orders from the New Empire. (Incidentally, blaming Japanese Militarism for Japan’s woes is disingenuous. After all, Japan embarked on its imperialist ventures BEFORE the military takeover and with the support & even encouragement of Western Imperialist powers. Furthermore, the leading imperialist powers in the world were all ‘democratic’: The UK, the US, and France. Also, most militarist governments were generally less imperialist, and more often than not, a nation turned to militarism as last recourse against foreign domination or total chaos. Franco and Pinochet were military leaders, but they didn’t invade anyone, and they came to power to defend the order from International Communism, a form of ideological imperialism. But as the US-dominant Narrative governs the world, Japanese are to believe that they were saved from bad old militarism with defeat and democracy. Such is the power of the Dream.)

While the Dream can be replaced by outright invasion, it’s no less true that the invaders without a strong Dream may fall under the Dream of the vanquished. Mongols invaded China but fell under the spell of the Middle Kingdom. The Romans, for all their military glory, were weak in the power of Dreams. So, they fell under the Dream of the Greeks and worshiped a fusion of Roman and Greek gods. Their art imitated Greek imagination. And later, Romans and Greeks fell under the Dream of the lowly Christians. They became figures in the Dream of Jesus and Paul, Jews rejected by Jews. Later, the Germanic barbarians invaded Rome, but as the barbarians were weak in the power of Dream, they too fell under the sway of the Christo-Roman Template.

The Power of Dreams comes in two forms. One where the Dream takes on a power all its own independent of the originator and the Other where the Dream is used by a people to control others. For example, all of the West fell under the power of the Greek Dream. Especially the Renaissance, Enlightenment, and 19th century archaeology prized Greek culture as the shining ideal. Still, it was the Greek Dream without Greek power as the Greeks had long declined and faded from importance. And Greeks were okay with this: The Greek Way conquering the human imagination around the world WITHOUT Greeks having direct power over humanity.

In contrast was the Jewish Way. Via Christianity, there was the power of the Jewish Dream without Jewish Power. Christians read the Sacred Texts of Jews, and Jewish spirituality and historiography had great impact on the West. But even as Europeans fell under the sway of the Jewish Dream(as Jesus, Disciples, and Paul were Jews steeped in Jewish tradition), they were independent of Jewish Power and even hostile to Jewish People. And Jews took umbrage at this. Perhaps, the relation between Jews and Christians would have been better IF Christianity didn’t insist that Jews rejected the Messiah and murdered Him. But, there was bound to be hostility between Judaism and Christianity because Jews couldn’t help but feel that Jesus and Paul laid the groundwork of smuggling the Jewish God to other peoples, the dirty gentiles. It was a violation of the Covenant, and therefore, Jews could only seethe with hatred for Jesus and the heretical Jews. As Jews were anti-Christian, Christianity could only develop as an anti-Jewish religion.

Anyway, if Greeks were resigned to the prestige of the Greek Dream being independent of Greek power(that was non-existent at any rate), Jews couldn’t tolerate Jewishness as an abstraction for other peoples without the input of the Jews themselves. Jews felt that all who adopted the Jewish Way must come under Jewish Sway. As both Christianity and Islam have origins in Judaism, Jews must control the West and the Near East.
So, Muslim nations must be battered with Neocon militarism to teach them a lesson of who’s the real Chosen of God. Because Islam is a proud militant religion, Jews know it’s difficult to take over the Muslim Soul.
In contrast, because Christianity is a religion of humility, guilt, and sin, Jews knew they could worm into the Christian Soul and re-code it for self-destruction. Alter the Christian Guilt Code toward feeling most ashamed of the Holocaust and Antisemitism(and ‘racism’ and ‘homophobia’) and then watch the dominos fall. As most Christians are craven, shallow, or stupid, their Sin Complex could be manipulated in algorithm. Do it like the guys in INCEPTION by Christopher Nolan. Enter the White Christian Dreamscape, locate and unlock the soul-safe Houdini-style, and alter the main object of worship from God & Jesus to Jew-Negro-Homo. Replace Virgin Mary with Anne Frank. Replace God with bellowing Negro. Replace angels with homo fairies. Thus, Christianity became cucked and worthless, a mere NPC program in a Jewish Dream of Dominion.

Jewish Power seeks to Greek-ize the West. Just like the Greek Way became divorced from Greek Power(whereby even non-Greeks took Greek ideas and idols with no regard for actual Greeks), the Western Way is to be divorced from Western Folks. We are told that Western Civilization is an Idea. It’s not about a particular people and their history, culture, and land. It’s an idea or ideal that can be adopted by anyone.
So, the power of the West must be a mere abstraction. Even if whites lose their lands and become minorities in their own nations due to mass immigration-invasion, they should rest assured as Western Civilization will remain powerful as a Dream for all of humanity. White people having power isn’t what the West is about. All that matters is the propagation of the Western Idea. As long as the Idea lives on as the Dream for others, the West is still #1.
And what is this Western Idea: A Universal commitment to liberty, individuality, rule of law, and property rights(and sucking up to Jews, blacks, and homos). So, even if white people were to vanish from the world, the West would be alive and well as long as people are into ‘muh liberty’ and property rights, along with Jugromo Worship. Following this logic, Chinese need not worry if China vanishes as long as people enjoy Moo-shu Pork. Chinese culture still alive, you see.

But of course, Jews would never want this for themselves. If someone told Jews, “Hey, don’t worry if Arabs or Muslims take over Israel and if you Jews vanish from the face of the Earth because the Jewish Idea will always be with us in the form of the Bible and the achievements of Jews such as Albert Einstein and Steven Spielberg.” Even the Koran could be said to be partly Judaic since Muhammad was influenced by Jewish Texts.
Now, would Jews be okay with a world of the Jewish Dream without Jewish Power(and People)? Of course not. Jews want to use their Dream as their hegemonic power over others. The Jewish Dream must never be independent of Jewish Power.

Jews weren’t content with Gentiles adopting and worshiping the Jewish God. They wanted to gain control over those who’d adopted the universalized form of Yahweh. Indeed, Jews even wanted to take God back from those people. What is Globo-Homo Queertianity but a bait-and-switch Jews are pulling on the Christians? By making Christians worship the inanity of Sodomic Globo-Homo, Jews are effectively turning Christianity into a junk-religion devoid of God.
Of course, Jewish Rabbis pretend to go along with globo-homo, but it’s just a ruse for the rubes. Keep in mind, the Talmud teaches Jews to use all forms of deception to hoodwink and destroy the goyim.

For Jews, a jealous people(like their God is jealous), Jewish Power must always command the Jewish Way. If Greeks are flattered that non-Greeks took the Greek Way and came to greatness(and even surpassed the Greeks), Jews are not happy about non-Jews having used the Jewish Way to achieve greatness. Deep down inside, Jews hate Christianity and Islam even as they take pride in the fact that all those hapless shallow goyim fell under the sway of the Jewish Dream.
For Jews, the respect for the Jewish Way must be accompanied by the supremacy of Jewish Power. The Jewish Way mustn’t be independent of Jewish Power. Muslims must be hammered into submission by the Chosen People of Zion. Christians must be manipulated into changing their religion to suit the outlook and sensibilities of Jews. So, how dare the Russians not fly ‘gay’ flags in Orthodox Churches to appease the Jews… like the Catholics are finally on the verge of doing, what with the poop-pope Francis blessing ‘gay marriages’.

White people have two paths: the Greek Way or the Jewish Way. The Greek Way says your civilization will live on as a great idea but minus the power(and even the survival) of the people who created it. The Jewish Way says your civilization must survive as an idea that is inseparable from the preservation and power of the people who created it. Jews believe that even though non-Jews can learn and take from Jewishness, the Jewish Way really belongs to the Jews who are its real owners. But Jews tell white people that the Western Way cannot in any way be claimed by white Europeans. It is to be a dream independent of the dreamer… so that it will succumb to The Dream Empire of the Jews.