Cuckfederacy caves to the ‘Woke’ demands to erase Southern History except as a lesson in shame and guilt

One man’s treason is another man’s reason and vice versa.

Was Southern Secession an act of treason? Yes, if you regard the American Union as inviolable and indivisible. No, if you believe in states’ rights, including the right to secede. It all depends on the premise, the foundational prejudice, of one’s worldview. One could say the US was created out of treason against the Mother Country. Or one can say it was founded on liberty and independence away from Father Tyranny, like with Zeus’ rebellion against his father Cronus.

Besides, if the US is so against treason(or ‘insurrections’), why encourage it around the world? The US cultivates collaborator agents in every country and encourages(and bribes) them to serve US interests than their own national interests. For twenty years, the US remained in Afghanistan by propping up a puppet regime that many Afghans regarded as treasonous.

Also, looking back on US history, was Manifest Destiny a treasonous act? If American values and ideals are about equal respect for all peoples and cultures, then Manifest Destiny violated such a principle by expanding westward and committing ‘genocide’ on the native folks. Was the US conquest of the SW Territories treasonous? After all, if the US was committed to national independence and sovereignty, did it not violate the sovereignty of Mexico by provoking a war to grab a chunk of its territory?

Of course, one can counter-argue that the vision of America has been to spread liberty and expand progress. So, if US expansion led to more freedoms and opportunities, it was justified, not only for Americans but in the eyes of history.

So, on the matter of the Confederacy, one can make a case for or against treason. Depending on the premise, either argument is valid or invalid. It’s like a conscientious objector can be regarded as a traitor/coward or a hero/saint depending on one’s views.

And then, there are matters of dual or higher loyalty. Muhammad Ali considered himself an American but also a BLACK American and a black Muslim. As such, he had a loyalty higher than to what he perceived as White America. He didn’t serve in Vietnam because he saw it as a white man’s war. In a way, one could say he was treasonous, but in another way, he was being true to his higher loyalties, i.e. had he served in the war, he would have been treasonous to Allah(as conceived by the Nation of Islam).

Generally, treason is most despicable when it’s mainly about personal gain, opportunism, and vanity. If you turn against your own people for thirty pieces of silver, you are scum. Or if you switch loyalties to the other side simply because it seems ‘cooler’ and more prestigious to hang with the richer/greater power, then you’re hollow, lacking a core.

In other cases, what may seem treasonous from the traditional perspective may be necessary reforms. Any great social upheaval or revolution is an act of treason against the past, resulting in much crisis and agony. But it makes for the birth of an improved or new order that may well benefit the great majority. Rise of Modern Turkey was an act of treason against the traditional Ottoman order, but it was time for change. Moreover, such a ‘treason’, fueled by idealism and vision, could be construed as a higher loyalty for the preservation of the order in a dangerous and threatening world. (Besides, one could argue arch-conservatism is also an act of treason. If the role of the ruling class is to govern well and improve the lives of its subjects, then its absolute refusal to implement essential reforms could be seen as a dereliction of duty.)

Treason comes in many flavors, the subtle, the ambiguous, and/or the even subconscious. Take mass immigration to the West. Most nonwhites, whether staying put or moving abroad, don’t consider emigration as treasonous. Even the ruling elites of many non-white nations encourage their own kind to emigrate. Partly, it’s due to surplus population, gaining greater economic access to and influence over the metropole, hope for remittances from the immigrant community, and etc. It isn’t regarded as treasonous because emigrants from nation A aren’t going to the US or EU to do harm to their country of origin.

For example, Turks aren’t going to Germany or the US for recruitment against Turkey. And yet, immigration is a kind of treason in the sense that immigrants are abandoning their own nations, pledging allegiance to another nation, forgetting their own identities & cultures, and mixing with other races to dangerous levels of deracination.

Furthermore, given the imperial nature of the US-EU empire under Jewish Power, there is always the chance, not a slight one, that the empire will target, sanction, destroy, and even invade one’s nation of origin. Indeed, what are Iranians to do when the US specifically targets Iran? Some Iranian-Americans in the US military will have to drop bombs on their own ethnic folks if it comes to war. Even Iranian-American civilians must pay taxes that support Jewish supremacist hostilities against Iran. What are Russian-Americans to do when the US, under Jewish control, is relentless in its hate campaigns against Russia? What are Chinese in America to do if a war breaks out between US and China, especially as the ‘American foreign policy’ isn’t decided by the American people but by a tiny cabal at the top?

Look to the past, and how did German-Americans fare during World War I? What did they end up doing under pressure? They were recruited to kill fellow Germans. At least In the case of World War II, Germany declared war on the US, especially after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, obliging all Americans to unite in the war effort. In contrast, the US entry into WWI was about banker interests, and German-Americans tragically found themselves slaughtering their own ethno-brethren in servility to the interests of Anglo and Jewish elites.

Jews understand this aspect of American History, i.e. it tends to force immigrant groups to join in the hostility against their own kind in the Old World, e.g. German-Americans vs Germans and Japanese-Americans vs Japanese.
It’s no wonder why Jews are resolved to be JEWISH-Americans than Jewish-AMERICANS and why they use media power and political influence to drum all politicians and all Americans with the notion that “Israel is America’s greatest ally”, i.e. Zion is synonymous with America. It hammers the message to Jews and goyim alike that it’s UNTHINKABLE for Americanism to target any Jew in any part of the world, though, of course, it’s America’s Sacred Duty to target any nation that earned the ire of Jews.

Unlike the Jews, German-Americans were such craven cowards that, instead of pushing back against the vile anti-German campaign in the US during WWI, they fully caved to Anglo-American prejudices. In some ways, Jews were more admirable in their resistance to such pressures following World War II when many Jews were under suspicion of sympathizing with World Communism. Jews were wrong to support communism but right to guard Jewish identity from American Power.

The fate of German-Americans and Swedish-Americans should be a powerful lesson about what happens to a people when they lose a strong sense of who they are and where they came from. Of course, the deracination disease has struck not only German-Americans and Swedish-Americans but Germans in Germany and Swedes in Sweden. The fate is Milwaukee, Madison, and Minneapolis. Once wonderful places, now either crime-infested cities or ‘woke’ cuckopolises into globo-homo-mania.

Generally, the story of mass immigration to the US has been a kind of treason. Immigration can only lead to ambivalent feelings about identity. After all, Mexicans have contradictory views of Mexican-Americans. In some ways, they are fellow Mexicanos, fellow Tacoan brethren. Many Mexicans even see Mexican-American immigration, legal and illegal, as a kind of Reconquista.

That said, Mexicans feel that Mexican-Americans who speak only Ingles, serve in the US military, and work as Cuckez agents of Gringo Nation are traitors. One reason why so many Mexicans didn’t warm to Jeb Bush despite his being pro-Mexican and having a Mexican wife was that the couple looked so much like a symbol of the US domination over Mexico. Big Gringo Man and Tiny Brown Woman. What Jeb regarded as his warmth and affection for Mexico was seen by Mexicans as domination and condescension. So, while many white Americans considered Jeb Bush as a symbol of treason — a globalist selling White America to a brown future — , many Mexicans saw Jeb’s wife as the kind of typical Mexican female in Hollywood movies with a gringo boss-man.

The charge of ‘treason’ is never a sure thing as anything can be deemed treasonous simply by moving the goal posts or altering the national code. The current war on the legacy of the Confederacy is essentially a part of the Jewish War on White. Just like Jews say whiteness is not intrinsic to being French or British or Dutch or Swedish or whatever, they say any form of defiant white identity is evil and wrong. Jews used BLM not only to topple Confederate but British statues. Neocons are especially invested in destroying the Confederate legacy because they operate in the GOP. As the GOP relies so heavily on the Deep South, it has become de facto the Neo-Confederate Party, or the Neocon-Federate Party. But that means Neocons in the GOP become associated with Southern ‘racists’, reflecting badly on the GOP’s total support for Zionism.

This is all very ironic because Jews, both Neocons and Liberal Zionists, totally support Israeli tyranny over Palestinians, turn a blind eye to IDF death squads mowing down Palestinian women & children, and support apartheid as integral to Jewish presence in the West Bank. Also, these ‘progressive’ Jews cut deals with theocratic Saudis and ISIS types. They even work well with Sub-Nazis in Ukraine.

The rule of American Politics is, “If Jews want it, they get it.” Not only do Jews demand it but, once the word is out that Jews want it, goy politicos of both parties, at the very least, dare not push back even if they don’t support it. The only choice is ‘get fully on board’ or ‘step out of the way’, e.g. the ‘gay marriage’ issue where one camp pushed for it while the camp(the so-called ‘conservatives’) just bowed their heads low and let the other side march to victory.

No wonder then that both parties have been complicit in the suppression of BDS. Both parties are for more billions to Israel and more sanctions on Iran and Syria. Both are now for globo-homo-mania. Both are for Negrolatry. If Jews want it, they get it. Jews got the power, and the Power decides.

Now, because the US is nominally a democracy, Jews don’t get everything right away, but they eventually get it as they push while no one pushes back. If one side pushes while the other side doesn’t push back, the pusher eventually wins out over time. It’s a simple law of physics, like with a car on neutral gear pushed only one way. Jews made sure there will be no counter-push to their pushiness.

As for the GOP, the attack on the Confederacy is both troubling and relieving. It may lead to backlash from the White South, but as the GOP is the Party of Lincoln, it’s always been inconvenient to rely on Neo-Confederate votes.

But then, the Culture War against the White South has been unrelenting and pervasive that even many white southerners are now finally dropping their ‘shameful’ heritage that insults the new cult of Negrolatry. Lynyrd Skynyrd consented to stop using Confederate flags at their concerts. NASCAR now follows suit. Walmart began in the South, but Confederate flags have been OUT since the church shooting some yrs ago. Dixie Chicks are now just Chicks. While Antifa and BLM thugs ravage memorials and statues, most white Southerners sullenly remain on the plantation of cuckery and do nothing.

Also, white Southern elites are trained in places like Harvard and Yale and other ‘liberal’ colleges. As such, they are little more than mental cucks of Jews and globalists. Besides, the current Southern elite attitudes are, to an extent, in line with traditional ones. The values and agendas are different but the attitudes are much the same. In the past, the Southern elites looked down on the ‘white trash’. Many of them favored House Negroes over poor white farmers.
Today, southern white elites virtue-signal by saying, “WE GOOD REPENTANT haute whites are NOT like those lowlife redneck vermin who still wave Stars & Bars and revere Stonewall Jackson. We wash Negro toes, kiss Jewish ass, and bend over to globo-homo ‘pride’.” Same old elitist attitude in a new attire.
But even white southern masses are changing. Their religion is football dominated by blacks who thump white guys and hump white girls. In integrated schools, many white guys get beaten up by black guys and cuck to blackness in their pathetic roles as worthless ‘whiggers’. And as rap music is big among white southern boys, they imitate blacks and no longer resist jungle-feverization of white women. They are finished. And there is mass immigration of yellows and browns who mostly vote Democratic. The South is really over. Same with Texas, now a land of cuckboys than cowboys, more of queers than steers.

In the end, while anything can be accused of treason, the accusation stings ONLY WHEN made by those in power. If the British had won, Benedict Arnold would have been honored as a patriot who served the crown while Washington and Jefferson would have been hanged as traitors. But the Revolutionaries won, and Washington became the Father of the American Republic whereas Benedict Arnold, at least in US history, became synonymous with ‘traitor’.

So, ‘treason’ is one of those power-words. It gains weight only if made with the power to back up the accusation with penalty. The proof is in the pudding of current politics.

In a way, all of today’s deep state elites are treasonous. The US elites don’t serve the US. They are globalists whose main loyalties are to the oligarchic matrix of Jewish supremacist power, multinational corporations, imperialist military-industrial-complex, the cult of Negrolatry, and globo-homo-mania as the new messianic neo-religion of the West. The Russia Collusion Hoax was one of the greatest acts of treason in US history, but it was spun as patriotism against Donald Trump, the treasonous puppet of evil Vladimir Putin or Putler.

So many people in the Deep State should be sent to prison or even executed for their plot against Trump who came to the presidency by a fair election — if unfair, the wronged side was Trump’s, but it still managed to eke out a win.
But notice the Deep State spins its own narratives and has the power to protect ‘made’ people. Just like Wall Street scum never faced justice after the 2008 fiasco, virtually everyone involved in the Russia Collusion Hoax has been protected and continues to run America.

Men like David Patraeus are traitors. They don’t defend or serve America. They serve Jewish supremacist imperialists and work for the kind of power that encourages Christian churches to drape themselves with ‘gay pride’ colors. In aiding and abetting the Zionist ‘genocide’ of Palestinians and the Wars for Israel(that target Muslims and Arabs), these men are actually violating the principles of ‘anti-racism’ that they claim to represent. They say the US must redeem its ‘racist’ past, but they have a strange way of going about it by aiding Zionist ‘racist’ terror against Palestinians, Arabs, and Iranians. So, ‘treason’ isn’t about truth or justice. It’s about who has the power, who gets to decide the political premise and ‘moral’ foundation, and who has the means to not only accuse others of treason but to use the power of institutions to make the charges stick.

In current the US and EU, the highest ‘loyalty’ and the greatest ‘patriotism’ are about cucking to Jewish supremacism, worshiping globo-homo queertianity, and kissing the black ass as magical. If you reject such notion, then you’re treasonous. But then, being accused of ‘treason’ by vile Jewish supremacists and globalist cucks should be an honor. One should NOT be loyal to such evil powers.
Today, the weasel globalist-generals who serve a globo-homo-ized US military in service to Jewish Supremacism and Jungle Fever/Faith dare charge the great Robert E. Lee, a loyal son of his beloved Virginia, of treason. With Jews, You Lose. Whites were fated to lose everything when they ceded their power and authority to Zion.

Now, a question. Suppose Southern States had more people and a bigger economy than the North in 1860 and suppose the Northern States seceded from the Union and Southern States waged war to restore the Union. Would the Northern States have committed treason?