We’ve been told by the Jewish-controlled and cuck-managed media and academia that the greatest ‘sin’ is ‘racism’. Now, if by ‘racism’, they mean blind and mindless hatred and hostility toward other races based on ignorance, arrogance, and contempt, we can agree. But we must ask why Race + Ism has been defined in such a manner. ‘Ism’ means belief, therefore Race + Ism = Belief in the Reality of Race and Racial Differences and/or the need for Racial Consciousness. Race-ism should mean belief and conviction in certain facts, ideas, and principles associated with racial realities. It shouldn’t mean the worst possible extreme and radical manifestation of that particular belief system. For example, being a Christian means one embraces the Faith and accepts Jesus as one’s savior. Christianity has ranged from extreme theocracy to something approaching New Age flakiness. There are hardline Christians, moderate Christians, tolerant Christians, and progressive Christians who reinterpret the Bible in startling ways. So, there is no single way to be Christian. But suppose someone defined Christianity by its most extreme expressions and actions, like that of the Jim Jones Cult. It’d be ridiculous. It’d be like defining ‘socialism’ primarily by associating it with Stalinism, Maoism, and Khmer-Rouge-ism. In fact, there have been various forms of socialism that weren’t tyrannical and ruthless/murderous. Then, how does it make sense to define ‘racism’ or ‘race-ism’ only by the extreme actions of the KKK, Nazis, or Nation of Islam? (By the way, the longest radical racism of contempt, paranoia, and hostility is probably certain strains of Judaism and Jewish World View.)

Here, I will use the term ‘race-ism’ to mean belief in the reality of race & racial differences and/or the need for racial consciousness. And by ‘race’, I also mean sub-race or ethnicity. There is the broad white race of Europeans and then ethnic groups or sub-races such as the Germanics, Slavs, Anglos, Celts, Italians, Hellenes, and etc.

Now, what is meant by the assertion that no race or nation can survive for long without race-ism? Obviously, it doesn’t mean the people of the nation must act like Nazis and ‘invade Poland’ and commit mass-killings of the Other. Instead, it argues that a people must know that they are unique and particular by blood & genetic inheritance and/or culture & history. Even if whites and blacks were raised and instilled with the same language and ideology, they would still constitute different races with unique features, temperaments, and styles. They might learn and borrow from one another, but if either group is to survive as a unique people, it must maintain a general separateness, sovereignty, and autonomy over its own territory and affairs.

Next, even if two peoples are genetically more-or-less identical, they may have different histories, cultures, customs, and legends that distinguish one from the other. There isn’t much genetic distance between Anglos and the Irish, but they have different histories and cultural consciousness. Same is true of Southern Chinese and Vietnamese. Many Greeks and Turks are similar in genetics and blood, but they are culturally and historically separate groups. Same goes for Germans and Swedes, even more so between Norwegians and Swedes. Just because Finns and Russians are both white Europeans doesn’t mean that they don’t have rich and varied differences in language, culture, and historical narratives. And those differences are what makes the world fascinating. For the world to be colorful and truly diverse, there must remain distinctions among peoples and cultures maintained by borders or territorial integrity.

And that’s why no nation, people, or culture will survive without race-ism and culturism: A belief in their racial and/or cultural uniqueness and the conviction to preserve such distinctions. It is by race-ism and culturism that people get to LAY CLAIM to their bios, ethnos, mythos, cultos, and terros. Without such a claim, your people have no deep or special claim to anything; they have nothing to call their own, in which case everything about them, their lands, their wealth, their culture, their history, and etc. would be toss-ups for sale at the global flea-market and flesh-market.
The entirety of your people, culture, land, and history would be reduced to mix-and-match items in the global pawnshop. Those assets may continue to exist physically but no longer as the sacred property of your people. Everything about your people could be raided, auctioned off, and traded as commodities around the world. Just like cattle exist but don’t own their selves and therefore exist to be sold and slaughtered for mass consumption, your people-culture-and-land will be turned into meat-and-dairy products under globalist hegemony. Cows can’t say NO to being butchered and sold because they have no concept of ownership. They belong to humans as sellers and buyers. They are mere economic units to be sold, alive or dead, whole or in pieces. Beef from Argentina may be sold to Mexico, the US, India, China, Europe, Saudi Arabia, and etc. Cows are sentient beings like we are, but they have no racial consciousness, no culture, no history, and no means to lay claim to anything, not even themselves. They are clueless creatures whose ‘meaning’ and purpose are decided by humans. If they had human intelligence and means of speech, they might be able to assert themselves.

But then, maybe not. After all, so much of humanity is being turned into faceless & mindless consumers and even commodities(even increasingly as sex objects), and their identities, cultures, and territories are being robbed from them, but they are either unawares or even complicit in their dehumanization, de-nationalization, and de-culturalization. And, even though Jews except themselves from the global commoditization of humanity, so many goyim praise and honor Jews as their masters(who deserve such special privileges) — it’s like how the other animals accept the Pig Elites as ‘more equal than others’ in George Orwell’s ANIMAL FARM. It goes to show human intelligence and consciousness are malleable. Rationally or irrationally, mini-minds and weak wills are twisted and manipulated by big minds and strong wills. While all people think and feel, most people can only ‘think’ and ‘feel’ as the cunning and strong-willed direct them to. And the big-minded and strong-willed elites of the current West are the Jews.

One of the most effective tools by which Jews robbed white goyim of any claim to blood, soil, culture, history, and morality was the media-academia complex that hammered the idea that there is no greater crime, even ‘sin’, than ‘racism’. In truth, Jews suppressed white race-ism(even in the moderate sense) to bolster a racial supremacism of their own. Notice how Jews denounce even the slightest hint of white identity and interests as ‘white supremacist’ while compelling whites to mindlessly support what is clearly Jewish racial supremacism.

Jews insist on Zionist imperialist tyranny over Palestinians and employ US foreign policy to threaten or vanquish perceived rivals in the Middle East by sanctions, invasions, and support of terrorism. In the US, Jews will not tolerate BDS(or justice for Palestinians) or a foreign policy that balances Zionist lobbying with the counter-interests of Arab-Americans, Muslim-Americans, and others. Instead, the entirety of American Policy must be for Jews Uber Alles, Israel First, and Zionic hegemonism over the Middle East and North Africa.
Furthermore, Jews have invested everything in desecrating and destroying true Christianity with globo-homo Queertianity. Despite Zionists having turned the Holy Land into Sodom and Gomorrah with massive homo ‘pride’ parades, the christ-cucks in US churches praise Jews and Israel in the most embarrassing ways. As for principled Christians like Rick Wiles who refuse to kneel before Satanic globo-homo Zion, they are censored, banned, and denied service by Jew-monopolies like Youtube and Paypal.

Video Link

Incredibly, Jews have convinced the great majority of Americans(and Europeans as well) to support their own supremacism, imperialism, and hatred via the pretense that they’re combating ‘white supremacism’ and ‘antisemitism’. Even “It’s Okay to be White” needs to be investigated by the FBI. And if you call out on Jewish imperialism and Zionist tyranny, you must be destroyed as an ‘Anti-Semite’. Jewish Power insists that White History has been nothing but one long wicked saga of ‘white privilege’, ‘white racism’, ‘white supremacism’, and etc. And because White History is so stained with various ‘sins’, even a smidgen of white consciousness, let alone pride, is reason for another inquisition.

In other words, whiteness = disease = evil. Whiteness is so toxic and noxious(and apparently infectious to other whites) that it must remain fumigated and quarantined at all times. Even if just a tiny bit were to escape from the lab, it will spread like a virus and turn the whole world nazi-and-kkk with gas chambers and burning crosses everywhere. Whites must be reminded at all times that they are not only infected but accursed with whiteness. They were born with something akin to a genetic disease and therefore must heed the stern advice of Jewish social scientists who prohibit any manifestation of whiteness. If anything, whites must welcome mass-immigration-invasion, the Great Replacement or White Nakba, and massive race-mixing. Whites must all be turned into brown people like those of Latin America or North Africa.

Whites no longer own their own history. White history has been doctored by Jews who associate whiteness with wickedness. Of course, if one were to do the same with Jewish History, Jews would cry ‘antisemitism’! Jews developed an effective moral and polemical shield against those who’d dare to rummage through Jewish History for evidence of evils, but whites have no comparable defense mechanism.

Jews also covered up the fact that some of the darkest ‘evils’ of white history were inseparable from Jewish History. Much of the slave trade that sold Slavs to North Africa and Near East were dominated by Jews. Jewish bankers financed much of Western Imperialism. Jews took part in the Atlantic Slave trade, especially in Brazil that brought over the greatest numbers of slaves. Jews of the British Empire sold opium to the Chinese. Jewish merchants traded with whites who wiped out the American Indians. Jews dominated much of organized crime in Europe and America. And Jewish communists played a key role in the ‘Russian Revolution’ that destroyed millions of lives. And Germans were in part driven to dangerous Nazism because of the preponderance of Jewish insanity in the Weimar Period.

Many of the evil chapters of genocide, imperialism, brutality, and slave-trade were co-written by Jews as merchants or financiers. But, cunning Jews focus ONLY on the WHITE aspects of those evils. Jews spread the notion among nonwhites that WHITES AND ONLY WHITES were guilty of all the wrongs done to them. Indeed, Jews even pretend to be allies and fellow-victims of the so-called Peoples of Color by selectively emphasizing events where Jews were attacked by whites while conveniently overlooking the fact that, more often than not, Jews in Europe worked with the European Imperialist elites in the conquest and exploitation of the world. Imagine if the French selectively pointed to events when they were attacked by the British and claimed fellow-victimhood with the subjects of the British Empire while totally ignoring the French history of empire-building.

Jews managed to fool whites and nonwhites alike. By creating the impression that nationalism in white nations is ‘racist’ and ‘xenophobic’, Jews persuaded nonwhites that Nationalism = White Supremacism, and therefore, ALL GOYIM(including nonwhites) must reject this Nazi-like nationalism and embrace globalism.
But in truth, whites didn’t conquer the world through nationalism but through imperialism, and nonwhites eventually regained autonomy and sovereignty through native nationalism and national liberation from Western Imperialism, which had been thrust upon the world not only with white arms but Jewish money. By conflating Nationalism with White Supremacism, Jews try to kill two birds with one stone. They mean to destroy nationalism not only in white nations but in non-white ones as well.

Without race-ism, there is no racial consciousness. The only permissible racial consciousness for whites is now negative-consciousness or anti-consciousness, i.e. whites are to deny and denounce their whiteness as a kind of original sin, from which World Evil originated. Whites mustn’t feel pride or claim possession of what they are, where they live, what they’ve done, and what they believe. The great achievements of whites must be attributed to ALL of humanity, especially blacks(even though they contributed the least to civilization). White history must retroactively be made ‘multi-racial’ and ‘multicultural’ so that ANY people can lay claim to it.
BBC plans to saturate historical programs of European History with lots of blacks and other nonwhites. Even the great white leaders and heroes must be made black or non-white.
Jewish scholars and activists say there was no such thing as WHITE History. Europe was never white but always ‘multicultural’ because NOT EVERY SINGLE PERSON in Europe was white. Even the Vikings were about black men humping white women. (Using this logic, Japan and China weren’t yellow because whites like Marco Polo came to visit.)

Apparently, the Middle Ages weren’t white-European because there might have been some Arabs and blacks in the mix in some quarter; therefore, Middle Ages were just as Arab and black. When we wipe away the BS, this isn’t really about blacks or Arabs but about Jews. Jews hate the idea of white consciousness that thinks in terms of “we white Christians” and “them Semitic Jews”. Such might lead to white consciousness calling for White Liberation from Current Jewish Supremacism. So, Jews not only push a Diverse Future on the White West but insist on a Diverse Past, even though nonwhites made up the tiniest percentage in most parts of Europe proper. Furthermore, many of these white encounters with nonwhites were violent and bloody: Moorish invasions, Mongol invasions, and European Crusades and incursions into non-white territories. If anyone wants to celebrate the Ottoman Occupation of Greece and Moorish conquest of Spain as wonders of Diversity, he or she is surely a mental slave of Jews. Do Jews celebrate the Roman sacking of Judea as a happy mixing of populations?

Video Link

There are two kinds of histories. Factual history, which should be left to professional historians who pore over the details. But for most people, the history that matters isn’t factual but mytho-narrative. While this kind of history should stick to facts as much as possible, its real objective is to mold a collective narrative imbued with meaning, significance, and purpose. It’s like a biography isn’t merely a chronicle of facts and data. It serves as a lively tale and summation of a life and its meaning. It is defined by a theme, one that features a person as more a hero or villain. Of course, no man is all villain and all hero. Everyone is a mix of both, and even heroic biographies must dwell on the dark side of their subjects.

Still, the main purpose of mytho-narrative is to defend, glorify, and romanticize the story of a people. Take the Old Testament. While some passages do present Jews as unworthy of God’s love and blessing, it ultimately justifies the story of Jews as a special people with a sacred contract or Covenant with God. This is why a mytho-narrative must be owned and controlled by your own people as word-warriors. They must shape a narrative that honors, defends, and justifies your people.

Tragically, white folks outsourced their mytho-narrative to the Jews who selectively made whites out to be the Devil, the Cancer, or the Virus of history. Would Jews be so stupid as to out-source their mytho-history to Palestinians, Iranians, or those deemed ‘anti-Semitic’? While those hostile to Jews may come up with a compelling and convincing story of Jewish Perfidy and Evils through human history, Jews themselves would be stupid not to own their own mytho-history and narrative. While it would be good for Jews(and any people) to face up to their moral failings, ultimately their mytho-narrative must be of light than darkness. Otherwise, a people will end up like current whites under Jewish Power that turned White History into an unmitigated saga of evil that can be redeemed ONLY BY cucking to Jews, ACOWW(or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs) , and White Nakba(aka the Great Replacement).

Now, consider race-ism and the ownership of homeland. Any territory without the stake of race-ist claim will eventually be lost no matter how rich and powerful a people may be. In the case of the American Indians, the lands were lost to whites because they were outnumbered, out-gunned, and out-fought. In contrast, whites are losing their lands in US, Canada, Australia, and Europe not because they are weak and poor but because they’ve lost race-ist claim to their nations.
Despite dire demographic trends, the White West is still the most powerful bloc in the world and could easily defend its domain with the requisite will, unity, and determination.

Then, why is it so defenseless against the prospect of White Nakba or the Great Replacement? It’s because whites have rejected the race-ist claim to history and territory. The claim of history and the claim of territory are interrelated because, after all, territorial claim is justified by historical narrative. “We Hungarians own Hungary because it’s the land bequeathed to us by our ancestors.” “We Jews founded the Jewish State in Palestine because it was our land in ancient times.” “We whites deserve to own and rule the US, Canada, and Australia because we founded and built great new nations in ways that ONLY WE could have.” Such race-ist historical claims serve as basis for race-ist territorial claims. These claims insist THIS is OURS, and NOT yours: Either the land belonged to our people ‘forever’ OR our people built something unique out of it.

But once a people reject race-ism, they lose racial consciousness. Their sense of story and territory becomes merely individualistic. ‘My Story’ and ‘My Property’ instead of ‘Our Story’ and ‘Our Posterity’. Once whites rejected race-ism, they rejected the very concept of white people with white history on white territory. So, while whites-as-individuals still have personal stories and private properties, they have no sense of collective narrative(except one that emphasizes ‘white guilt’) and collective ownership of territory or national property. While individualism is useful and productive, it lacks a sense of higher purpose and deeper meaning. As no individual is immortal like a god, it makes no sense to put oneself at the center of existence and meaning. Every individual must realize he is part of a link, one who inherits and bequeaths. Something like libertarian individualism has no sense of meaning beyond ‘me, me, me’. Furthermore, the fact that so many libertarians nevertheless suck up to Jews, blacks, and homos imply that liberty and individuality aren’t enough. Even as they denigrate and negate white identity in the name of ‘muh individuality’, they feel this urge to serve something-bigger-than-themselves, which is usually ‘muh Israel’, ‘muh Magic Negro’, or ‘muh holy homo’.

Anyway, the White West is fading into oblivion because it subjectively abandoned race-ism, the consciousness that had once united whites into proud peoples with a powerful claim over the lands on which they lived and their ancestors fought and died. Without race-ist consciousness, they no longer feel united as members of a race and nation. Without racial solidarity, they lack a unique sense of history and racial territory. No longer caring for white identity, they’ve effectively forfeited white claims over white territory.

Indeed, the new dogma is that whiteness is just a social construct or, worse, a disease/cancer, and therefore, whites must renounce any meaningful passion about race, history, or culture. Lacking such, how can white lay special claim to anything? How can a particular land belong to whites when whites reject their own identity? Without white identity, there is no claim of white territory.

Thus, it doesn’t matter how many white people there are currently in a certain nation, even if they constitute the solid majority for the time being; it doesn’t matter how much wealth they have or how much power they wield in terms of guns, tanks, and bombers.
As long as they lack a race-ist or racial consciousness, they lack any special claim to their history and territory. They cannot justify the use of force, however formidable, to prevent the Great Replacement since the very coding of their civilization has rejected the racial claim to anything.
Then, even as tons of nonwhites pour in as migrants, immigrants, refugees, or whatever, whites cannot say NO as their order is defined by anti-race-ism that forbids any white claim to ownership.

No wonder then that white nations have been rendered defenseless against even rag-tag illegal migrants. After all, who are whites to tell nonwhites, arriving legally or illegally, that they don’t have any claim on white lands that primarily belong to whites? Europe is still so much richer and stronger than African and Muslim nations in objective terms, but its subjective ‘anti-racist’ values cannot say NO to the marauders and great-replacists.

Worse, not only is white identity taboo but white anti-identity is all the rage among the neo-puritanical putties(as in ‘white minds are putty in Jewish hands’) who’ve been infected with Jewish Propaganda. So, not only are whites defenseless against the invasion but they are hastening the invasion and Great Replacement with enthusiasm bordering on lunacy.
Some do it in the name of humanitarianism, but if so, why don’t they call attention to the factors that created so many refugees in the first place? Why don’t they condemn Jewish Supremacism and Wars for Israel that, for example, forced so many Syrians into exile?

Objective/material power is useless with subjective/mental weakness. Suppose you own a home with lots of guns and bullets. The house has powerful walls and lots of food and supplies. Objectively, you are well-protected and secure indeed. But suppose you subjectively believe that you have no special claim to the house. As such, when trespassers arrive and ask to be let in, you just let them in. You have the guns but dare not use them against the invaders because you reject any special claim to the house. Same logic applies to nations. If you lose race-ist consciousness, you’ve lost the race-ist claim to your land. Then, it is open season for the whole world… which is what is happening to the West.

All this OBJECTIVE MATERIAL power is useless if the civilizational code renders a people defenseless against ‘Diversity’.

One of the most important assets a race or people have is possession of the women. A people are effectively finished when the women of the race lose respect for the men. Such women are likely to forgo wifehood and motherhood, thereby failing to produce the next generation. Or worse, they might go with the men of another race, even the invasive and colonizing race because it is the nature of women to go with winner-conquerors(even of enemy races). Always, the conquering race takes the women of the conquered race. When People A conquer People B, the men of People A don’t say to the men of People B, “Hey, come over and hump our mothers, wives, daughters, and etc.” No, it’s the winning side that conquers and colonizes the wombs of the losing side.
When Turks ruled over Greece, they took Greek women. When Mongols invaded China, Iran, and Russia, they took the women of the conquered. When whites were masters over blacks as slaves, white men humped black women. When Zionists took nearly all of Palestine and carried out Nakba, they raped Arab women as sexual trophies. When Soviet Troops entered Germany, they raped German women. When the US defeated Japan, they used Japanese women as whores. When the Spanish Conquistadors took over South America and Mexico, they took native brown women.

Now, not all conquering folks were enthusiastic about race-mixing. The British Empire was more allergic to race-mixing than the French Empire and Spanish Empire. National Socialists discouraged race-mixing whereas the Soviet Empire encouraged it. Anyway, the fate of the brown natives of what is called ‘Latin America’ should be a reminder of what happens when the men lose possession and the respect of their own women. Brown men were defeated by white Spaniards who took brown women to produce a neo-race of ‘mestizos’ who became confused in identity and, to this day, lack any real sense of what they are.
While race-mixing of any kind always weakens and dilutes the identity of the conquerors as well as of the conquered, it is always more damaging psychologically and culturally to the conquered people. It was painful for Russian men to see their daughters taken by Mongol barbarians. It was shameful for Vietnamese men to see their women turned into a bunch of whores by the US military. It was shameful for black men to see their women be taken by ‘honkey-ass mothafuc*as’ in the Old South. French men were none too happy to see French women run into the arms of German occupiers. (Granted, some of these French women weren’t necessarily treasonous in spirit. They regarded pre-Occupation France as a Jewish-dominated tyranny and therefore welcomed Germans as liberators.) Without women, there is no future for the race. And while men can produce kids with women of any race, in order to perpetuate the aesthetics, soul, and temperament of their own folk, they should ideally have children with their own women. Spanish men had children with native brown women, and the results were rather Guillermo-ish(of the dreadful Jimmy Kimmel Show). Guillermo may be a nice guy and all, but he doesn’t look quite like a Spaniard. Nor does he look like a proud Mayan warrior. He looks like a human burrito.

In our time, the biggest threat to white ownership of white women and white aesthetics comes from ‘anti-racism’ and Jungle Fever, a kind of double whammy. If Political Correctness is the colonization of white minds by Jewish propaganda, Biological Correctness is the colonization of white wombs by black seed.
In a way, both PC and Jungle Fever are ‘natural’ insofar as smaller minds cuck to bigger minds and wussier men cuck to tougher men. When whites began to practice inter-meritocracy with other groups, they were bound to lose out to the ‘best man’. White Power could only be sustained with intra-meritocracy that rewarded the best among the whites AGAINST nonwhites. But once whites adopted universal inter-meritocracy, white minds lost out to Jewish minds higher in IQ and stronger in will. And, white muscle lost out to tougher black muscle, and white dongs lost out to bigger black dongs. (And unlike JFK who spoke about the Missile Gap and the Space Race, white race hasn’t even thought to start a genetic project to overcome the Dong Gap.)

Now, why did whites forsake intra-meritocracy that served and sustained White Power so well and instead go with inter-meritocracy, a universal call for ‘may the best man of any race win’? Part of the reason was the rise of rationalism and its concept of universal justice. Another reason was rooted in Christian ethos. Also, the radical racists such as the National Socialists gave racial consciousness a bad name. Ironically however, even as Jews reviled racial consciousness among whites on grounds of Nazi Evil in World War II, they revamped their own racial consciousness with the Zionist project and imposition of Jewish Supremacist Power.

In any case, when white people gave up on racial consciousness, each and every white person was encouraged to be a mere individualist, consumer, hedonist, celebrity-obsessed idol worshiper, and etc. White women felt ‘liberated’ and no longer ‘owned’ by white men, denounced as the evil patriarchs by Jewish academia and media. And, being mostly stupid or dumb, they just came to be mentally owned by Jews and sexually owned by blacks. White women went from a people of a race, history, and heritage to mere commodities of Jews and playthings of blacks. And white men, instead of waking up to the threat posed by Jews and blacks, were too brainwashed with ‘white guilt’ and ‘white fever'(for black thrills in sports and rap) to unite and fight to defend their race, homeland, heritage, honor, and womenfolk.

At this juncture in history, it all looks hopeless. The great lesson, at any rate, is that a people are bound to lose their identity, history, homeland, and women when they abandon race-ism. While sane people need to forsake extreme race-ism(like religious people should reject theocratic fanaticism), they need to know there is nothing more precious and valuable than race-ism in the preservation of a people and culture on the sacred land. If whites want to reclaim their land and culture for their posterity, they must say NO to Jewish Supremacism and regain white race-ist consciousness.